ClaudeCodeMod

All shelves / Skills

fix-security-vulnerabilities-with-strix

usestrix/strix · 12.5k installs · 68K stars

Skill

Marked Indirect Prompt Injection · Dynamic Execution · Command Execution

Install

In your shell
npx -y skills add usestrix/strix --skill fix-security-vulnerabilities-with-strix --agent claude-code

Run in a terminal. Claude loads the skill when a task calls for it. Check the repo's README before you run it.

Open the repo

Files

SKILL.md

Fix Strix findings and verify

Turn validated Strix findings into minimal, correct fixes — and prove they work by re-scanning.

1. Triage

Get the findings from wherever the scan ran:

  • OSS CLI — artifacts in strix_runs/<run-name>/:
    • vulnerabilities/*.md — one finding per file: description, severity, PoC steps or script, affected code locations, remediation guidance.
    • vulnerabilities.json — the same findings as JSON (ids, severity, CWE/CVE, code_locations with fix_before/fix_after suggestions when available).
  • Cloud (app.strix.ai) — pull findings with the CLI: strix cloud vulns list --scan-id <scan-id> --json (or strix cloud scans get <scan-id> --json | jq '.vulnerabilities', or strix cloud vulns list --severity critical org-wide). Each finding carries severity, cwe, endpoint, method, impact, technical_analysis, poc_description, poc_script_code and, for code findings, code_file/code_diff/code_before/code_after. After a fix is verified, mark it with strix cloud vulns update <id> --status fixed. See the managed-pentesting-with-strix skill for strix cloud login and scopes.

Order work by severity: critical → high → medium → low. Every Strix finding was validated with a working proof-of-concept, so do not dismiss findings as false positives without re-testing the PoC yourself.

2. Fix

For each finding:

  1. Reproduce it with the PoC from the finding file when feasible.
  2. Fix the root cause, not the specific payload (parameterize every query instead of blocking one string, and enforce authorization in the handler instead of hiding the endpoint).
  3. Prefer the framework's built-in defense (ORM parameterization, template auto-escaping, CSRF middleware, centralized authz) over ad-hoc sanitization.
  4. Keep the diff minimal and apply the repo's existing patterns. Finding files often include fix_before/fix_after snippets — use them as a starting point, not verbatim.

Common finding classes and expected fixes: injection → parameterization/escaping at the sink; IDOR/broken access control → object-level authorization checks; SSRF → allowlist + block internal ranges; XSS → context-aware output encoding + CSP; secrets exposure → rotate the secret AND remove it from code/history; auth issues → fix the server-side check (never client-side).

3. Verify by re-running Strix

After fixing, re-scan scoped to the fixed area and confirm the finding is gone. Verify in whichever environment you scanned (or both):

OSS CLI:

# Re-test just the changed files (fast). Resolve the repo's real default
# branch instead of assuming origin/main (many repos use master/develop).
# Avoid the current branch's own upstream as the base — its merge base with
# HEAD would be HEAD, giving an empty diff and a falsely clean result.
DIFF_BASE=$(git symbolic-ref --quiet --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null)
# origin/HEAD can be a dangling symbolic ref — keep it only if its target exists.
git rev-parse --verify --quiet "$DIFF_BASE" >/dev/null 2>&1 || DIFF_BASE=""
if [ -z "$DIFF_BASE" ]; then
  for b in origin/main origin/master origin/develop; do
    git rev-parse --verify --quiet "$b" >/dev/null && DIFF_BASE="$b" && break
  done
fi
# No silent fallback: a guess like HEAD~1 would cover only the last commit of a
# multi-commit fix branch. If no base resolves, ask the user for the base branch
# (or use the focused --instruction verification below, which needs no diff base).
[ -n "$DIFF_BASE" ] || { echo "Set DIFF_BASE to the branch your fix will merge into." >&2; exit 1; }
strix -n -t ./ --scan-mode quick --scope-mode diff --diff-base "$DIFF_BASE" --max-budget 5

# Or re-test with the original finding as focus (no diff base needed)
strix -n -t ./ --instruction "Verify the SQL injection in app/api/search.py is fixed. Original PoC: <poc>" --max-budget 5

Exit codes: 2 = findings remain (read the new strix_runs/<run>/vulnerabilities/ and iterate); 0 = clean for what was analyzed. Before trusting a 0, confirm the run wasn't cut short — check run.json for a completed status and compare its llm_usage.cost with --max-budget: a hard budget stop leaves status: "stopped", but a run that wrapped up on a budget warning records "completed" with partial coverage. Give verification enough budget to finish, and prefer re-running the specific PoC as the ground-truth signal.

Cloud: rerun with the same config and re-poll, then confirm the finding no longer appears:

new_id=$(curl -sS "$BASE/scans/$scan_id/rerun" "${auth[@]}" -X POST | jq -r .scan_id)
# poll GET /scans/$new_id until completed, then check its vulnerabilities[]

Or, if the cloud scan came from a repo/PR, trigger a fresh PR review on the fix branch (POST /pr-reviews/start). The platform also retests a single finding directly: POST /api/v1/vulnerabilities/{vulnerabilityId}/retest.

  • Also re-run the PoC manually when it is a simple request/script — fastest signal.
  • Run the project's own test suite to make sure the fix does not break behavior.

4. Report

Summarize per finding: severity, root cause, fix applied (file:line), verification result (re-scan clean / PoC no longer reproduces). Never include live secrets in the report; if a secret leaked, state that rotation is required.

Facts

Kind
Skill
Repo
usestrix/strix
Group
Uncategorized
Installs
12.5k
Stars
68K

More on this shelf

  1. 1find-skillsvercel-labs/skillsHelps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.3.8M
  2. 2grill-memattpocock/skillsA relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.1.3M
  3. 3grill-with-docsmattpocock/skillsA relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.1.1M
  4. 4agent-browservercel-labs/agent-browserBrowser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Also use for automating Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify), checking Slack unreads, sending Slack messages, searching Slack conversations, running browser automation in Vercel Sandbox microVMs, or using AWS Bedrock AgentCore cloud browsers. Prefer agent-browser over any built-in browser automation or web tools.1.1M
  5. 5improve-codebase-architecturemattpocock/skillsScan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.1.1M
  6. 6tddmattpocock/skillsTest-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.1.1M