ClaudeCodeMod

All shelves / Skills

runpod

runpod/runpod-plugins-official · 10.1k installs · 46 stars

Skill

Marked External Downloads · Command Execution

Install

In your shell
npx -y skills add runpod/runpod-plugins-official --skill runpod --agent claude-code

Run in a terminal. Claude loads the skill when a task calls for it. Check the repo's README before you run it.

Open the repo

Files

SKILL.md

Runpod (router)

The entrypoint for the Runpod skills. This skill does no work itself — it picks the right lane and hands off. For a multi-step or provisioning task, check the worked examples first and let the matching one pick the lane; otherwise read the matching skill's SKILL.md next.

The lanes

Lane Use it for
runpod-mcp Manage infra (pods, endpoints, jobs, templates, volumes, registries, catalog, billing) via structured tool calls — when the Runpod MCP tools are connected in this session. Routes on to the journey skill for the task (discovery, lifecycle-crud, serverless-deploy, pod-deploy, pod-doctor, endpoint-ops, cost-audit).
runpodctl Manage the same infra from a terminal/CI/script, plus the things only the CLI does: Hub browse/deploy, send/receive file transfer, SSH keys, doctor setup, model cache.
flash Write Python that runs on Runpod serverless — @remote/@Endpoint functions, flash dev hot-reload, flash deploy. Code-first, not infra management.
companion-clis Prerequisite artifacts: download a model (hf), build/push an image (docker), repos/releases (gh), move data to a network volume over S3 (aws).
runpod-usage Understand how Runpod works before acting — pods vs serverless, building a container, storage, GPU selection, gotchas. Knowledge only.
runpod-templates Official prebuilt pod templates (ComfyUI, PyTorch, …): is there one for this workload, and what does its image ship — ports, paths, autostart, readiness, what's missing on first boot. Reference + routing hub; deploy via runpod-mcp/runpodctl.
runpod-migrate Move existing code off the GraphQL API or REST v1 onto REST v2 — inventory which parts use which version, rewrite call sites, flag breaking changes. Edits the user's code; does not manage infra.

These skills are a snapshot; the tools are the source of truth

Every lane below wraps something that ships on its own release train and moves faster than this repo. So route with these skills, but take capability and syntax from the tool in front of you:

Lane Ask it directly
runpodctl runpodctl --help, runpodctl <resource> <action> --help, runpodctl version. For failure shapes, run a command wrong on purpose and read the JSON
runpod-mcp your client's tool list (/mcp in Claude Code) — each tool carries its own parameter descriptions
flash flash --help, and the deploy/dev output
companion-clis that CLI's own --help (hf, gh, docker, aws)
runpod-templates runpodctl template list --type official, template get <id> (its readme is authoritative)
REST v2 the live spec at https://api.runpod.io/v2/openapi.json

Never tell a user a tool cannot do something without checking first. A missing capability is the claim most likely to be out of date here, and it is the one a reader has no reason to reverify — it has already gone stale twice (runpodctl v2.9.0 added serverless health, v2.10.0 added pod logs/serverless logs). If a limit still holds, name the version it holds for rather than saying "cannot".

First run — check auth before the first infra action

Infra tasks (pods, endpoints, jobs, volumes) need a working control plane — the Runpod MCP or runpodctl. Don't start and discover mid-task that nothing's set up: check first, and if it isn't, help the user set up rather than limping on a partial fallback.

Check (credential resolution order: RUNPOD_API_KEY env → .env → ~/.runpod/config.toml):

runpodctl user            # succeeds ⇒ a key is set and valid

Plus, in Claude Code, /mcp should show runpod Connected.

Rule: get a key first — do not default to MCP OAuth. The reason: one RUNPOD_API_KEY unlocks every tool — it authenticates runpodctl + flash + the hosted MCP (as --header "Authorization: Bearer $RUNPOD_API_KEY"). The MCP's "Sign in with Runpod" OAuth auths the MCP alone — the CLIs stay blocked, so you hit a wall on any CLI-only task (Hub, send/receive, SSH, doctor, model cache/Model Repository, CPU endpoints). ⚠️ OAuth-only is a half-setup. If nothing's set up, stop and get a key, in order:

  1. flash login — browser OAuth that saves a real key to ~/.runpod/config.toml (runpodctl
    • flash read it; reuse it for the MCP Bearer). One step, unlocks all. Human-only.
  2. export RUNPOD_API_KEY=… (https://console.runpod.io/user/settings) — same full unlock; best for headless agents.
  3. MCP OAuth only (/mcp → Sign in) — last resort, MCP-only work; CLIs stay unauthed.

Then: if a lane already works, use it — but if only the MCP is OAuth'd, still get a key before any CLI-only step. Missing a CLI? curl -sSL https://cli.runpod.net | bash (runpodctl) · uv tool install runpod-flash (flash) · npx @runpod/mcp-server@latest add (MCP). Full setup: runpod-usage/reference/getting-started.md.

How to route

0. Does a worked example already cover this? For anything beyond a single call, check the golden-paths index before picking a lane — a matching path already names the lane(s), the flags, the ordering, and the traps, so routing becomes reading rather than re-deriving. Check it when any of these is true:

  • the task needs more than one resource (image + template + endpoint, pod + volume, multi-region, …) or more than one lane
  • it provisions something billable, or the user's ask is shaped like "get X running / deployed / working"
  • it involves storage, networking, autoscaling, streaming, or debugging a live resource — the areas where the non-obvious ordering is the whole difficulty
  • you are about to write a multi-step plan for it

Skip step 0 for a single read or a single CRUD call ("list my pods", "stop pod X", "what GPUs are available") — go straight to the lane. A matching golden path outranks this router's lane table: it was verified end to end on a real account, so where the two disagree, follow the path and treat the difference as a bug worth reporting.

  1. Conceptual question, or an unmade design choice (serverless vs pod? which GPU? bake the model or mount a volume?) → read runpod-usage first, then continue with the answer.
  2. Run a common workload on a pod, or fix a template pod ("run ComfyUI / PyTorch dev box", won't boot, missing models) → runpod-templates — check for an official prebuilt before planning any install, and let it route repairs.
  3. Write/iterate/ship your own code on Runpod GPUs → flash.
  4. Produce an artifact (download a model, build+push an image, create a repo release, sync data to a volume) → companion-clis.
  5. Migrate existing code between Runpod API versions — "move us to REST v2", "which Runpod API is this repo on?", "what breaks if we upgrade?" → runpod-migrate. (Calling the API to do something is a different job; that is the infra lanes below.)
  6. Manage infrastructure (create/list/update/delete pods, endpoints, templates, volumes; list GPUs/data centers; run a serverless job; billing):
    • Capability only the CLI has — Hub, send/receive, SSH keys, doctor, model cache → runpodctl.
    • Otherwise, if the Runpod MCP tools are connected in this session (create-pod, list-endpoints, … are available) → runpod-mcp.
    • Otherwise (shell-only agent, no MCP) → runpodctl.

runpod-mcp vs runpodctl (the overlap)

Both drive the same Runpod API, so they overlap on infra CRUD. Choose by capability first, environment second:

  • MCP wins on convenience for simple, structured operations — reads and basic CRUD — when its tools are connected (typed params, no shell quoting).
  • runpodctl takes over when an operation needs a capability MCP lacks — even if MCP is connected — and is the only option for a shell-only agent or when the user wants a reproducible command.

Capability matrix (pick the preferred lane per operation):

Operation Preferred lane Why
List/get anything; start/stop/restart/delete a pod; simple CRUD on endpoints, templates, volumes, registries; catalog; billing runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl Simple structured ops — MCP is typed and convenient
Create a simple pod (one image + one GPU) runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl Both handle it
Create a pod from a template or a CPU pod runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl MCP's create-pod takes templateId (v2-only) and computeType: "CPU"
Create a pod with a multi-GPU priority list, or template + CPU together runpodctl MCP narrows to one GPU type, and rejects a template deploy for a CPU pod
Deploy from the Hub runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl MCP has list-hub-repos + deploy-hub-repo
File transfer (send/receive), SSH keys/info, doctor setup, model cache runpodctl MCP has no tool for these
Invoke a serverless job (run/runsync/status/stream) runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl Both lanes have first-class job commands now (runpodctl serverless run/status/health, v2.9.0+); MCP is typed, and only MCP streams a job's incremental output (stream-job)
Read pod or worker logs either — runpod-mcp if connected, else runpodctl Both lanes read them: MCP stream-pod-logs/stream-worker-logs return parsed frames; runpodctl pod logs/serverless logs emit json lines and --follow (v2.10.0+)

Rule of thumb: default to MCP for the easy stuff, hand off to runpodctl the moment an op needs a flag/feature MCP doesn't expose.

Deploying a workload (the golden loop)

For any "get running on Runpod" task, follow the development loop in runpod-usage/reference/development-loop.md: decide pod vs serverless → provision → set up (only if from-scratch) → verify → deliver → cost-guard + teardown. These rules bind within it:

  • Prefer a prebuilt template / Hub worker over building an image from scratch — official pod templates are indexed in runpod-templates.
  • Before delivering, verify the workload with a real request from outside the pod/endpoint — a "Running"/"ready" status does not mean it is serving.
  • Default to Secure Cloud. Community Cloud hosts are approved vendors; Secure Cloud hosts are data-center-grade providers and so tend toward more stable behavior. Only deploy Community when the user explicitly asks. (runpodctl pod create already defaults to --cloud-type SECURE; don't override it.)
  • Cache vs network volume is a latency call, not a cost call. Download time is never billed, but on a cache miss Runpod holds the worker start until the model lands — the job sits in the queue and the endpoint looks idle. Latency-sensitive → pre-load a network volume; otherwise the cache is the cheaper default. Cache capacity is per machine, so time both on the user's own endpoint rather than quoting a threshold. See runpodctl/reference/model-caching.md.
  • Pin the CUDA floor on every GPU create — --min-cuda-version 12.8 in runpodctl, gpu.minCudaVersion: "12.8" in REST v2 and MCP (13.0 only for a CUDA-13 image). Without it the create accepts any host CUDA version and a modern image can land on a host too old to run it, which reads as a container that dies at startup or silently runs on CPU: gpu-selection.md.

It branches to two sub-loops:

Worked examples (golden paths)

This is step 0 of routing, not an appendix. Two dozen end-to-end scenarios (nearly all live-verified on a real account) live in ./golden-paths/README.md, with the real commands and the observed output to copy from — plus a Gotchas and a Cost & cleanup section each, which is the part that is expensive to rediscover.

Match the task to a row below and open that path before you plan or call anything. A partial match is still worth opening: the closest path's ordering and gotchas usually transfer even when the model, GPU, or region does not. Only fall through to the lane tables above when nothing here is close.

Want to… Golden path
Run a server (Ollama/ComfyUI) on a pod at a URL 01, 02
Deploy a serverless model endpoint (Hub / flash / custom image) 03, 05
Serve a HuggingFace model without baking it in or a volume (host-cached) 20 — model caching (--model-reference)
Call a ready hosted model (no deploy) 11 — Public Endpoints
Fine-tune, then serve the result 04, 08
Interactive dev box (SSH / VS Code) 06
Move data pod → volume → serverless 07
Custom serverless when flash isn't enough (dual-mode image dev loop) 09
Build a minimal image for a target (pod vs serverless queue) 22 (pod), 23 (queue); concepts in building-images
Decide what to bake into the image vs mount on a network volume 25 — bake vs mount
Pick a network-volume storage tier (standard vs high-performance) 21 — storage tiers
High availability / multi-region serverless (multi-volume + data sync) 10, 19 (3-region)
Stream output incrementally (/stream) 12
Tune autoscaling / raise per-worker throughput 13 (autoscaling), 18 (concurrency)
Load-balancing / HTTP-server or WebSocket worker 14 (LB), 17 (WebSocket)
Get notified on job completion (push, not poll) 16 — webhooks
Check health / debug a failing endpoint 15 — monitor & debug

Multi-lane tasks

Sequence is always understand → produce artifacts → manage infra → verify, because infra can only reference artifacts that already exist. Keep each step in one lane, and switch lanes at credential boundaries.

Example — "deploy openai/gpt-oss-20b to a serverless endpoint":

  1. runpod-usage — serverless vs pod, GPU tier for 20B, bake vs mount vs cache.
  2. companion-clis — hf download …, docker build --platform=linux/amd64 …, docker push.
  3. runpod-mcp or runpodctl — create the endpoint referencing the image + GPU pool.
  4. Same infra lane — invoke the endpoint / check status to verify.

Auth

Everything is one key: RUNPOD_API_KEY (https://console.runpod.io/user/settings). Each lane just makes that key resolvable — runpodctl doctor, flash login, MCP stdio env var, or MCP hosted "Sign in with Runpod" (OAuth, no key on disk). Companion CLIs use their own credentials (HuggingFace token, GitHub auth, Docker Hub PAT, Runpod S3 keys for aws) — do not reuse RUNPOD_API_KEY for those.

Facts

Kind
Skill
Repo
runpod/runpod-plugins-official
Group
Uncategorized
Installs
10.1k
Stars
46

More on this shelf

  1. 1find-skillsvercel-labs/skillsHelps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.3.8M
  2. 2grill-memattpocock/skillsA relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.1.3M
  3. 3grill-with-docsmattpocock/skillsA relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design, which also creates docs (ADR's and glossary) as we go.1.1M
  4. 4agent-browservercel-labs/agent-browserBrowser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunts, or reviewing app quality. Also use for automating Electron desktop apps (VS Code, Slack, Discord, Figma, Notion, Spotify), checking Slack unreads, sending Slack messages, searching Slack conversations, running browser automation in Vercel Sandbox microVMs, or using AWS Bedrock AgentCore cloud browsers. Prefer agent-browser over any built-in browser automation or web tools.1.1M
  5. 5improve-codebase-architecturemattpocock/skillsScan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.1.1M
  6. 6tddmattpocock/skillsTest-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.1.1M