lawvable/awesome-legal-skills
lawvable/awesome-legal-skills · 264 plugins
Marketplace A curated list of awesome Agent Skills for automating legal work
Install
The repo has no one-line install. Follow its README.
Plugins 264
After adding the marketplace, install one with /plugin install <name>@lawve-ai.
- 1pdf-editor-openaiToolkit for comprehensive PDF reading and creation with visual quality control. Use to work with PDFs (.pdf files) for: (1) Reading or extracting content from existing PDFs, (2) Creating new PDF documents with professional formatting, (3) Generating reports, documents, or layouts that require precise typography and design, or any other PDF reading or generation tasks.
/plugin install pdf-editor-openai@lawve-ai - 2agent-authority-charter-builder-arkadiy-miteikoCreates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allowed to do, who delegated authority to it, what actions are permitted or prohibited, when human approval is required, what evidence must be preserved, and how the agent can be suspended, revoked, or escalated.
/plugin install agent-authority-charter-builder-arkadiy-miteiko@lawve-ai - 3dora-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classification or reporting, threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, Register of Information, contractual provisions with ICT providers, ICT concentration risk, oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs), or any DORA RTS/ITS obligation.
/plugin install dora-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 4due-diligence-gate-adrian-lererUse for due diligence, legal-financial risk review, investment or business transaction checklists, and preliminary screening where facts, documents, assumptions, legal uncertainty, debt/equity, assets/liabilities, contracts, tax, regulatory, compliance, technology/product, and financial-model issues must be separated clearly.
/plugin install due-diligence-gate-adrian-lerer@lawve-ai - 5financial-comparison-glossary-adrian-lererUse when a calculator, financial model, investor memo, due diligence report, risk review, dashboard, or client-facing explanation needs clear distinctions between accounting and finance concepts such as cash flow vs profit, EBIT vs EBITDA, CapEx vs OpEx, debt vs equity, market value vs book value, ROI vs ROE, assets vs liabilities, and accounting vs finance.
/plugin install financial-comparison-glossary-adrian-lerer@lawve-ai - 6pci-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert PCI DSS compliance advisor covering PCI DSS v4.0.1 (current) and v4.0. Use this skill whenever a user asks about PCI DSS, payment card security, cardholder data protection, CDE scoping, SAQ types (A, A-EP, B, B-IP, C, C-VT, P2PE, D), ROC, AOC, QSA assessments, ASV scans, merchant levels, service provider levels, network segmentation, penetration testing, tokenisation, encryption of PAN data, or any of the 12 PCI DSS requirements.
/plugin install pci-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 7runtime-admissibility-review-arkadiy-miteikoDetermines whether a specific AI-agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible for execution or institutional reliance under current authority, delegated scope, evidence, facts, policy, risk, escalation, and revocation conditions. Use this Skill before an enterprise or regulated AI agent executes, updates records, triggers workflows, communicates externally, or before an institution relies on an agentic output in a way that creates legal, financial, operational, regulatory, customer, employee, patient, citizen, market, contractual, or reputational consequence.
/plugin install runtime-admissibility-review-arkadiy-miteiko@lawve-ai - 8swift-csp-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) advisor covering the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF v2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about SWIFT CSP, CSCF controls, SWIFT security attestation, KYC-SA portal, SWIFT architecture types (A1/A2/A3/A4/B), mandatory vs advisory controls, independent assessment, SWIFT secure zone, secure flow zone, MFA for operators, SWIFT messaging security, payment fraud prevention on SWIFT, gap analysis for CSCF, or compliance with SWIFT's 32 controls (25 mandatory, 7 advisory in v2026) across the three objectives: Secure Your Environment, Know and Limit Access, Detect and Respond. Control 2.4 (Back-Office Data Flow Security) is now mandatory in v2026. v2026 attestation window is July 1– December 31, 2026. Trigger for any SWIFT CSP or CSCF compliance question.
/plugin install swift-csp-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 9arbitration-clause-design-and-review-hafez-virjeeDraft, review and stress-test arbitration clauses in commercial contracts, with guidance on seat, institution, rules, confidentiality, governing law and commercial fit. In more detail, this workflow helps users identify drafting issues, assess whether an arbitration clause is workable and commercially aligned with the transaction, generate clean revised wording, and produce concise explanations or negotiation points. It is designed for in-house counsel, lawyers and commercial teams, and uses public arbitration resources including model clauses, GAP materials and institutional cost/duration sources where relevant.
/plugin install arbitration-clause-design-and-review-hafez-virjee@lawve-ai - 10climate-aligned-contracts-the-chancery-lane-projectDraft, adapt, and review contracts and clauses aligned with The Chancery Lane Project's methodology for reducing carbon emissions through legal agreements. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Draft new climate-aligned clauses (e.g., net zero commitments, carbon accounting, supply chain decarbonization), (2) Adapt or modify existing contracts to incorporate climate objectives, (3) Review and analyze clauses for alignment with climate goals and decarbonization strategies, (4) Provide guidance on The Chancery Lane Project's house style and drafting methodology for climate-conscious legal work.
/plugin install climate-aligned-contracts-the-chancery-lane-project@lawve-ai - 11contract-intelligence-workflow-reviewer-carl-ditzlerContract intelligence and contract operations workflow skill for Claude and Codex. Guides the full contract lifecycle review process from intake and playbook normalization through clause review, deviation scoring, negotiation planning, approval routing, QA, and action recommendations. Reviews legal, business, operational, compliance, privacy, security, technology, and AI-related risks across contracts and legal documents. Supports NDAs, SaaS agreements, DPAs, procurement contracts, commercial agreements, contract comparisons, redlines, approval packages, clause research, and drafting. **Warning**-Comprehensive reviews can consume significant Claude/OpenAI tokens, especially for large agreements, playbooks, exhibits, schedules, and multi-document reviews.
/plugin install contract-intelligence-workflow-reviewer-carl-ditzler@lawve-ai - 12contract-risk-analyzer-sneha-ganapavarapuAnalyses contracts for risk across five critical clauses (Limitation of Liability, Indemnities, IP Ownership, Data Protection, Termination). Built for founders with no legal background. Flags red flags, explains risks in plain language, and provides negotiation guidance.
/plugin install contract-risk-analyzer-sneha-ganapavarapu@lawve-ai - 13icelandic-contract-review-magnus-smarasonUse this skill when asked to review, analyze, or draft a contract governed by Icelandic law. Triggers on requests involving Icelandic commercial agreements, consumer contracts, sales agreements, service contracts, or any contract where Icelandic mandatory rules may apply.
/plugin install icelandic-contract-review-magnus-smarason@lawve-ai - 14ktzr-polskie-umowy-gospodarcze-adam-piotrowskiSkill do analizy i tworzenia umów według polskiego prawa, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem umów B2B, IP i IT (body leasing, NDA, wdrożenia, SaaS, przeniesienie praw autorskich, ugody). Powstał w Kancelarii Radców Prawnych Żurawska Piotrowski i Wspólnicy (ktzr.pl). Używaj zawsze gdy użytkownik prosi o przeanalizowanie polskiej umowy, audyt ryzyk umownych, wygenerowanie nowej umowy w stylu KTZR, dodanie/edycję klauzuli, sprawdzenie spójności umowy lub gdy wkleja/załącza polski dokument umowny do oceny. Stosuj również gdy pojawia się pojęcie "Złote Reguły KTZR", "essentialia negotii", "baza klauzul KTZR" lub gdy użytkownik wspomina o kancelarii KTZR / swojej kancelarii.
/plugin install ktzr-polskie-umowy-gospodarcze-adam-piotrowski@lawve-ai - 15nda-reviewer-anthropicScreen incoming NDAs and classify them as GREEN (standard), YELLOW (needs review), or RED (significant issues). Use when a new NDA comes in from sales or business development, when assessing NDA risk level, or when deciding whether an NDA needs full counsel review.
/plugin install nda-reviewer-anthropic@lawve-ai - 16nda-reviewer-jamie-tsoReviews incoming one-way (unilateral) commercial NDAs in a jurisdiction-agnostic way, from either a Recipient or Discloser perspective (user-selected), producing a clause-by-clause issue log with preferred redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, and deadlines.
/plugin install nda-reviewer-jamie-tso@lawve-ai - 17playbook-reviewer-anthropicReview contracts against your organization's negotiation playbook, flagging deviations and generating redline suggestions. Use when reviewing vendor contracts, customer agreements, or any commercial agreement where you need clause-by-clause analysis against standard positions.
/plugin install playbook-reviewer-anthropic@lawve-ai - 18tech-contract-negotiator-patrick-munroGuide to negotiating technology services agreements, professional services contracts, and commercial B2B transactions. Provides three-position frameworks (provider-favorable, balanced, client-favorable), deal-size tactics, objection handling templates, and concession roadmaps. Use when: (1) Developing negotiation strategies for SaaS, cloud, or managed services agreements, (2) Preparing position papers and fallback positions, (3) Responding to counterparty objections and demands, (4) Creating concession roadmaps that protect critical interests, (5) Assessing tactics based on deal value and leverage, or (6) Structuring balanced outcomes for liability, IP, payment, SLA, or warranty provisions.
/plugin install tech-contract-negotiator-patrick-munro@lawve-ai - 19tech-contract-review-parth-desaiJurisdiction-aware review of technology and commercial contracts — MSA, DPA, SOW, LOE, NDA, SLA, EULA, IP assignment, vendor/supplier, and API/platform ToS. Classifies every clause (acceptable / negotiate / red-flag / missing), proposes redline replacements, checks governing law and data-protection obligations (GDPR, UK GDPR, India DPDP Act, CCPA), and outputs a structured risk summary. Built for tech and AI deals where training-data, IP-ownership, and liability terms need heightened scrutiny. Not a substitute for qualified legal counsel.
/plugin install tech-contract-review-parth-desai@lawve-ai - 20tos-clause-scanner-moonshot-aiAudit Terms of Service, user agreements, and privacy policies for consumer risks, producing a structured report that flags unfair clauses, data traps, and liability issues. Trigger when a user asks to review, audit, or analyze a ToS, privacy policy, or user agreement, or mentions specific concerns like auto-renewal or data authorization.
/plugin install tos-clause-scanner-moonshot-ai@lawve-ai - 21yc-saas-drafter-victor-wangDrafts a customized SaaS Customer Agreement starting from the Y Combinator standard form SaaS template. Runs a structured intake covering fee structure, data handling, ML/AI rights, implementation services, SLA, and governing law, then applies 18 always-on professional defaults plus 12 conditional decisions. Outputs a clean .docx ready for review alongside a lawyer-facing memo that itemizes every change from the YC baseline and flags each item still requiring attorney input. Aimed at startup founders preparing first-draft customer subscription agreements.
/plugin install yc-saas-drafter-victor-wang@lawve-ai - 22ai-audit-trail-larissa-meredith-flisterThis skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.
/plugin install ai-audit-trail-larissa-meredith-flister@lawve-ai - 23ai-governance-reviewer-carl-ditzlerConduct AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk reviews of internal AI use cases, AI product features, LLM workflows, or third-party AI vendors. The skill runs a structured intake process, identifies required documentation and missing evidence, maps the use case to AI governance frameworks and applicable legal domains, and produces a governance review with scorecards, findings, owners, remediation actions, and follow-up questions.
/plugin install ai-governance-reviewer-carl-ditzler@lawve-ai - 24analyse-sanctions-et-exportations-gillan-salehOutil d'analyse des sanctions économiques internationales et du contrôle des exportations pour Claude Desktop. Screening individuel en temps réel sur 30+ listes officielles (ONU, UE, OFAC, OFSI, DGT France...), analyse sectorielle, biens à double usage (Reg. UE 2021/821), régimes extraterritoriaux US/Chine (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), risque USD/SWIFT et cartographie de 30+ juridictions. Résultats sourcés et vérifiés en temps réel — aucune réponse de mémoire. Répond en français, anglais, allemand, espagnol, russe et chinois. Mis à jour au 19 mai 2026 (20ème paquet UE, SEUC UK, EO Cuba). Outil indicatif — ne se substitue pas à un avis juridique.
/plugin install analyse-sanctions-et-exportations-gillan-saleh@lawve-ai - 25argentine-supreme-court-analysis-adrian-lererPageRank-based jurisprudential authority analysis for Argentine case law (CSJN, federal courts). Peer-reviewed methodology published in JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Ranks precedents by citation network influence with temporal decay.
/plugin install argentine-supreme-court-analysis-adrian-lerer@lawve-ai - 26bacen-compliance-sentinel-rafael-mastronardiOrientação completa sobre conformidade com regulamentações do Banco Central do Brasil: Resolução CMN nº 4.893/2021 (Política de Segurança Cibernética), Resolução BCB nº 85/2021 (GRSIC), Open Finance Brasil (Resoluções BCB nº 32/2020 e atualizações), e demais normas prudenciais do BACEN. Cobre elaboração e revisão de Política de Segurança Cibernética, Plano de Ação e Resposta a Incidentes (PARI), Gestão de Riscos de Serviços de Informação e Comunicação (GRSIC), consentimento e compartilhamento de dados no Open Finance, requisitos de API, gestão de terceiros (outsourcing) e sanções do BACEN. Triggers: Bacen, Banco Central, CMN 4.893, Resolução 4.893, segurança cibernética bancária, PARI, GRSIC, Open Finance, Open Banking, compartilhamento de dados financeiros, consentimento Open Finance, API financeira, outsourcing bancário, risco cibernético, incidente cibernético banco, LGPD financeira, fintech compliance, instituição financeira, DICT, Pix segurança.
/plugin install bacen-compliance-sentinel-rafael-mastronardi@lawve-ai - 27cmmc-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert CMMC 2.0 (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) advisor for US defense contractors and subcontractors in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). Use this skill whenever a user asks about CMMC 2.0, CMMC Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3, DoD cybersecurity compliance, NIST SP 800-171, CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information) protection, System Security Plan (SSP), Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M), C3PAO assessments, DIBCAC audits, self-assessment, SPRS score, or any requirement under DFARS 252.204-7012 or 7021.
/plugin install cmmc-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 28cra-vulnerability-obligations-ansvar-aiCited EU Cyber Resilience Act assessment for a product with digital elements: scope, product classification, role-specific vulnerability-handling duties, and Article 14 reporting - joined with live CVE / CISA-KEV / EPSS vulnerability intelligence, and a NIS2 / GDPR / DORA entity-level screen. Requires the free Ansvar Gateway MCP connector; every legal claim is fetched from official publisher text at answer time and cited, never answered from model memory.
/plugin install cra-vulnerability-obligations-ansvar-ai@lawve-ai - 29cross-regulatory-impact-analyzer-patrick-munroAnalyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.
/plugin install cross-regulatory-impact-analyzer-patrick-munro@lawve-ai - 30ear-tanaji-hemant-naikExport Administration Regulations (EAR, 15 CFR Parts 730-774) compliance advisor — ECCN classification across all 10 CCL categories and 5 product groups (A-E), EAR99 determination, jurisdiction analysis (EAR vs ITAR order of review), license requirement analysis via Country Chart, all license exceptions (LVS, GBS, CIV, TMP, RPL, GOV, TSU, ENC, TSR, APP, BAG, AVS, ACE), end-user/end-use controls (Entity List, Denied Persons List, Unverified List, MEU List), deemed export rules, Foreign Direct Product Rule (FDPR), de minimis thresholds, 10 General Prohibitions, SNAP-R license applications, voluntary self-disclosure, civil/criminal penalties, Export Compliance Program (ECP) design, and EAR vs ITAR jurisdiction determination. Use for any dual-use export control, CCL classification, or BIS compliance question.
/plugin install ear-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 31enforcement-action-analysis-amir-fadaviAnalyze any OFAC or OFSI enforcement action — by URL, pasted text, or uploaded document — and produce a structured root cause analysis as a formatted Excel (.xlsx) spreadsheet. Use this skill whenever a user names, links to, pastes, or uploads an OFAC or OFSI enforcement action and asks for any of the following: root cause analysis, compliance gaps, what went wrong, lessons learned, organizational self-assessment, or remediation planning. Also trigger when a user asks "analyze this enforcement action", "what were the root causes", "turn this into a checklist", or "how do I make sure this doesn't happen to us". Outputs a single-sheet .xlsx table with six columns: Root Cause | What Went Wrong | How It Went Wrong | What Could Have Stopped It | Is my organization immune to this? (Yes/No/Partial) | Notes.
/plugin install enforcement-action-analysis-amir-fadavi@lawve-ai - 32eu-ai-act-examination-report-generator-oliver-schmidt-prietzGenerate a formal, structured AI Act compliance assessment report suitable for legal files, audit trails, and regulatory inquiries. Supports multiple output formats: full assessment report, classification record (Prüfprotokoll), compliance register entry, and management briefing (Entscheidungsvorlage), with optional Word document export.
/plugin install eu-ai-act-examination-report-generator-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 33eu-ai-act-high-risk-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietzDepth assessment of whether an AI system is high-risk under Art. 6 of the EU AI Act, grounded in the Commission's draft Art. 6(5) classification guidelines (general principles + Annex I + Annex III). Covers the Annex I product-safety route, all eight Annex III areas with worked examples, the Art. 6(3) exception and its profiling re-exception, and the Art. 25 quasi-provider trap. Outputs a structured decision block, a practitioner memo, and a JSON interchange artefact.
/plugin install eu-ai-act-high-risk-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 34eu-ai-act-high-risk-implementation-readiness-werner-plutatAssess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when users say things like “we classified this as high-risk, what now?”, “build an EU AI Act readiness plan”, “assess our Annex III compliance gaps”, “what do providers/deployers of high-risk AI need to implement?”, “prepare for conformity assessment”, or “create a high-risk AI implementation roadmap.”
/plugin install eu-ai-act-high-risk-implementation-readiness-werner-plutat@lawve-ai - 35eu-ai-act-knowledge-base-oliver-schmidt-prietzAuthoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents, including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification. Answers any EU AI Act question with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, and sector-specific guidance — covering penalties, timelines, GPAI obligations, high-risk and prohibited practices, and the AI Act / GDPR interplay.
/plugin install eu-ai-act-knowledge-base-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 36eu-ai-act-obligations-mapper-oliver-schmidt-prietzMap the full set of legal obligations based on role and risk tier under the EU AI Act, producing an actionable compliance matrix with RACI assignments, implementation priorities, GDPR cross-references, and a phased implementation roadmap.
/plugin install eu-ai-act-obligations-mapper-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 37eu-ai-act-quick-assessment-oliver-schmidt-prietzFast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary AI Act classification and compliance assessment. Produces a preliminary output with risk tier, role, top obligations, compliance timeline, and jurisdiction flags, then routes to detailed skills for full analysis.
/plugin install eu-ai-act-quick-assessment-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 38eu-ai-act-role-determination-oliver-schmidt-prietzDetermine the organization's role under the EU AI Act — provider (Anbieter), deployer (Betreiber), importer, distributor, or quasi-provider — and assess Art. 25 quasi-provider risk from substantial modifications, rebranding, or changed intended purpose.
/plugin install eu-ai-act-role-determination-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 39eu-ai-act-system-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietzDetermine whether a technology qualifies as an AI system under Art. 3(1) and classify its risk tier (prohibited, high-risk, GPAI with systemic risk, limited risk, minimal risk). Covers scope exclusions (Art. 2), AI system definition test (7 criteria), prohibited practice screening (Art. 5), high-risk assessment (Annex I + III with Art. 6(3) exception), GPAI check, and Art. 50 transparency triggers.
/plugin install eu-ai-act-system-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 40eu-ai-act-system-classifier-werner-plutatClassify an AI system under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and map the compliance obligations that follow. Walks Art. 2 scope exclusions, Art. 3(1) AI system definition (7-criteria test), Art. 5 prohibited practice screening, Annex I and Annex III high-risk assessment with the Art. 6(3) narrow procedural exception, Art. 51-56 GPAI with the 10^25 FLOP systemic risk threshold, and Art. 50 transparency triggers. Built for in-house counsel classifying real systems: medical imaging, medical devices, credit scoring, insurance pricing, HR or CV screening, biometric identification, emotion recognition, deepfake or synthetic content, content moderation, fraud detection, generative AI or foundation model deployments. DACH routing for Betriebsrat consultation, BaFin, BSI, BNetzA, BfDI. Pairs with the EU AI Act High-Risk Implementation Readiness, FRIA, GPAI Code of Practice, and Serious Incident Reporting skills for downstream workflow.
/plugin install eu-ai-act-system-classifier-werner-plutat@lawve-ai - 41eu-ai-act-transparency-assessor-oliver-schmidt-prietzAssesses which of the Art. 50(1)-(5) transparency obligations of the EU AI Act apply to a given AI system's provider or deployer, grounded in the final Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content (June 2026) and the Commission's draft Art. 50 Guidelines. Covers AI-chatbot disclosure, deepfake and synthetic-content marking/watermarking, emotion-recognition and biometric-categorisation notices, the machine-readable marking duty, the obviousness exceptions, and the implementation timeline. Outputs a formal mini-report plus a per-obligation compliance checklist with gap flags. For breadth-first tier triage use the EU AI Act System Classifier; for raw Art. 50 text and Q&A use the EU AI Act Knowledge Base; for the full role x tier matrix use the EU AI Act Obligations Mapper.
/plugin install eu-ai-act-transparency-assessor-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 42eu-data-act-compliance-assessment-werner-plutatAssess compliance obligations under the EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854) for connected products, IoT devices, data sharing, cloud switching, B2B fairness, B2G data access, dispute resolution, and international data transfers. Covers scope assessment (manufacturer, data holder, data recipient roles), user data access rights, pre-sale transparency, unfair contract terms, public authority data requests, cloud portability, dispute settlement mechanisms, international transfer restrictions, access-by-design obligations, trade secret protection, and cross-regulation mapping with GDPR, AI Act, and CRA. Use when assessing Data Act obligations, designing connected products, drafting data sharing contracts, responding to B2G requests, planning cloud switching capabilities, or evaluating dispute resolution options.
/plugin install eu-data-act-compliance-assessment-werner-plutat@lawve-ai - 43eu-data-act-ryan-malekA working tool for lawyers advising on the EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854). Hand it the facts of a matter and it returns a classification memo, a drafting starter, a verbatim regulation lookup, an applied legal analysis, or a gap audit. Every output quotes verbatim from the bundled regulation and the European Commission's FAQ rather than paraphrasing from memory. Sixteen drafting templates cover what lawyers actually draft against: Art. 3(2) and 3(3) pre-contract notices, Art. 25 data-processing-service clauses, Art. 26, 28, and 29 public pages, the three-part trade-secret refusal pack, a safety and security restriction clause, and a third-party data-sharing request. Output goes to chat by default. A one-click Word export styled for client work is available after the chat answer, with a verified-as-of stamp and live EUR-Lex and FAQ links so currency is always visible on the page.
/plugin install eu-data-act-ryan-malek@lawve-ai - 44fundamental-rights-impact-assessment-eu-ai-act-art-27-werner-plutatAssess whether a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is required under Article 27 EU AI Act, and structure or draft that assessment for a specific high-risk AI deployment. Covers deployer scope gating (public bodies and private entities providing public services), affected group mapping, Charter rights analysis, proportionality, safeguards evaluation, residual risk, DPIA/FRIA interaction, notification under Article 27(3), and DACH-specific considerations. Use when asked about FRIA obligations, Article 27 scope, fundamental rights and AI, or deployer assessment duties.
/plugin install fundamental-rights-impact-assessment-eu-ai-act-art-27-werner-plutat@lawve-ai - 45gpai-code-of-practice-compliance-werner-plutatAssess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), Articles 51-56. Covers GPAI model identification (Art. 3(63)), systemic risk model designation (Art. 3(65), Art. 51, 10^25 FLOP training compute threshold), upstream provider obligations under Art. 53 (transparency, technical documentation, copyright policy, training data summary), additional systemic risk obligations under Art. 55 (model evaluation, adversarial testing, AI Office incident notification, cybersecurity), systemic-risk notification and Commission designation under Art. 52, downstream Art. 25 quasi-provider duties, and Art. 53(2) open-source exemption. Built for in-house counsel and AI governance teams reviewing LLM or foundation model deployments, drafting GPAI compliance plans, or assessing systemic risk thresholds. DACH: BaFin, BSI, BNetzA. Pairs with the EU AI Act System Classifier, High-Risk Readiness, FRIA, and Serious Incident Reporting skills.
/plugin install gpai-code-of-practice-compliance-werner-plutat@lawve-ai - 46incident-reporting-navigator-ansvar-aiOne security incident can trigger several EU reporting regimes at once. This skill screens NIS2, GDPR, DORA, and the Cyber Resilience Act for each involved legal entity, applies the served trigger tests, checks each duty was actually in force for the incident, resolves the receiving authority per regime and member state from served national law (e.g. Dutch and German transpositions), and produces a deadline table in which every duty, authority, and deadline is quoted and cited from official publisher text. Requires the free Ansvar Gateway MCP connector; never answers from model memory - a connector failure is never converted into "no duty exists".
/plugin install incident-reporting-navigator-ansvar-ai@lawve-ai - 47iso27001-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert ISO 27001 compliance assistant for security and compliance teams. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO 27001 or ISO/IEC 27001, including any of the following: gap analysis, auditing, compliance assessments, control checklists, policy writing, document generation, Statement of Applicability (SoA), risk assessment, risk registers, risk treatment plans, Annex A controls, ISMS implementation, clause requirements, certification readiness, transitioning from 2013 to 2022, control implementation guidance, incident response policies, access control policies, supplier security, or any information security management system (ISMS) topic.
/plugin install iso27001-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 48itar-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert ITAR compliance advisor for US defense contractors, exporters, and manufacturers. Use this skill for any question about 22 CFR Parts 120-130, the United States Munitions List (USML), DDTC registration, export license applications (DSP-5/73/94), Technical Assistance Agreements (TAA), Manufacturing License Agreements (MLA), brokering regulations (Part 129), deemed export rules for foreign nationals, technology control plans, voluntary disclosures, violation mitigation, jurisdiction determination (ITAR vs EAR), or US Munitions List category scoping.
/plugin install itar-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 49legal-risk-assessment-moonshot-aiAssess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
/plugin install legal-risk-assessment-moonshot-ai@lawve-ai - 50legal-risk-assessment-zacharie-laikAssess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
/plugin install legal-risk-assessment-zacharie-laik@lawve-ai - 51legal-risk-assessor-anthropicAssess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.
/plugin install legal-risk-assessor-anthropic@lawve-ai - 52monitor-prawa-ue-i-polskiego-grzegorz-skuzaWyszukiwanie, pobieranie i analiza aktów prawnych UE oraz polskich aktów i projektów wdrażających regulacje UE (np. PPWR, CBAM, EUDR, ESPR, CSRD, CSDDD, GPSR, AI Act, baterie, ekoprojekt). Używaj, gdy użytkownik potrzebuje statusu prawnego, dat stosowania, przepisów przejściowych, relacji aktów, obowiązków compliance i raportu z podstawami prawnymi oraz źródłami urzędowymi.
/plugin install monitor-prawa-ue-i-polskiego-grzegorz-skuza@lawve-ai - 53morocco-ecommerce-compliance-audit-omar-laftouhPerforms a legal compliance audit for a Moroccan e-commerce website, focused on personal data protection (Law 09-08) and consumer contract disclosures/obligations (Law 31-08). Use this skill when a user asks to audit, check, or assess the legal compliance of an e-commerce website operating in Morocco — presence and validity of Terms & Conditions, privacy policy, CNDP declaration, mandatory disclosures, right of withdrawal, consent banner. Out of scope: compliance for other countries, Meta/Google advertising compliance (covered by another skill), definitive legal advice (results are a starting point for professional review, not legal advice).
/plugin install morocco-ecommerce-compliance-audit-omar-laftouh@lawve-ai - 54new-sanctions-designation-screening-test-amir-fadaviGenerate a spreadsheet of test entries — newly designated names from OFAC, OFSI, and EU sanctions lists plus deliberate variations of those names — to validate that a sanctions screening system catches fresh designations and is tuned to the right fuzziness threshold. Use this whenever the user asks for sanctions list update test data, screening regression test data, screening QA, fuzzy match calibration, or wants to verify their screening lists are current. Trigger even if the user doesn't say 'screening' explicitly — phrases like 'test my sanctions list', 'check our SDN coverage', 'is my list up to date', or 'build me a regression set from the latest designations' should also invoke this skill.
/plugin install new-sanctions-designation-screening-test-amir-fadavi@lawve-ai - 55nis2-navigator-oliver-schmidt-prietzStructured NIS2 compliance assessment covering scope classification (Annex I/II, size thresholds, DORA/CIR checks), gap analysis across all 10 Art. 21 risk management measures with 0–4 maturity scoring and ISO 27001 references, and a prioritized compliance roadmap. Deep German BSIG-neu coverage (BSI registration, § 30/32/38, incident reporting, Nachweispflicht) plus high-level jurisdiction profiles for Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, and Spain. Built on ENISA guidance and BSI #nis2know packages.
/plugin install nis2-navigator-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 56nist-ai-rmf-rafal-frycThis skill helps you apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and can quote AI RMF subcategories and GenAI profile action IDs verbatim from NIST AI 100-1 and 600-1. The skill routes you to the correct category as needed and has three modes, picked automatically from your question: 1. Consult: “What should I do per the AI RMF for this system?” 2. Governance Plan: “What should our AI governance program include?” 3. Assessment: “Run a full AI RMF aligned impact assessment for this system.” It knows the difference between the Core and the GenAI overlay, and won’t dump profile actions on a classifier or recommender.
/plugin install nist-ai-rmf-rafal-fryc@lawve-ai - 57privacy-policy-stephane-boghossianA zero-hallucination privacy-policy generator that takes anyone — non-lawyer founder to lawyer — from a guided intake to a publishable, jurisdiction-aware privacy policy. Jurisdiction-first: it detects which laws apply from where your users are, then drafts only the required clauses — GDPR/EU + UK, US (CCPA/CPRA, ~20 state laws, COPPA, sector overlays), and global/MENA (LGPD, Quebec Law 25, India DPDP, China PIPL, UAE/DIFC, Saudi PDPL), plus app-store, cookies, and AI/EU AI Act disclosures. Its rule: state only what you confirm; never invent a statute, citation, fine, or date — every claim is source-cited and QA-gated. Not legal advice.
/plugin install privacy-policy-stephane-boghossian@lawve-ai - 58privilege-sentinel-emily-cabreraPre-flight privilege and work-product check for legal AI prompts. Use when the user is about to send legal content to a third-party AI surface and wants to know whether the prompt risks blowing attorney-client privilege or work-product protection. Returns a SAFE/CAUTION/STOP band with cited factors, a discovery-impact line, and a redacted-safe rewrite.
/plugin install privilege-sentinel-emily-cabrera@lawve-ai - 59regulatory-audit-generator-moonshot-aiBuilds compliance checklists for business scenarios involving GDPR, PIPL, or advertising/data laws. Outputs a structured checklist with check items, legal basis, risk levels, and actionable recommendations. Triggered by requests like \"run a compliance check,\" \"GDPR/PIPL compliance,\" \"pre-launch review,\" \"privacy impact assessment (PIA/DPIA),\" or asking if a feature is compliant.
/plugin install regulatory-audit-generator-moonshot-ai@lawve-ai - 60regulatory-deal-card-generator-patrick-munroGenerates standalone interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user needs an interactive regulatory guide for (1) contract negotiation support, (2) client education or internal training, (3) regulatory briefings for commercial stakeholders, or (4) structured comparison between required and flexible compliance paths. Primary focus on EU digital regulation (Data Act, AI Act, CRA, DORA, NIS2, GDPR) but the structural pattern transfers to any regulation where separating hard obligations from implementation choice is the point. Supports bilingual output where the jurisdiction calls for it.
/plugin install regulatory-deal-card-generator-patrick-munro@lawve-ai - 61regulatory-threat-model-ansvar-aiRuns a server-enforced STRIDE threat model and LINDDUN privacy threat model over a system described in prose, screens named dependencies against live CVE/KEV/EPSS data, and builds a cited screen of which EU security obligations (GDPR, NIS2, CRA, AI Act) may apply and which need determination - every regulatory statement fetched from officially published text through the Ansvar Gateway connector at answer time, with scope, role, and application-date limits stated. Never answered from model memory; never a compliance verdict.
/plugin install regulatory-threat-model-ansvar-ai@lawve-ai - 62sanctions-and-export-analysis-gillan-salehReal-time individual screening across 30+ official lists (UN, EU, OFAC, OFSI, French DGT...), sectoral analysis, dual-use goods (EU Reg. 2021/821), US/China extraterritorial regimes (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), USD/SWIFT risk and jurisdictional mapping across 30+ countries.
/plugin install sanctions-and-export-analysis-gillan-saleh@lawve-ai - 63sanctions-screening-matei-clejScreen a client, counterparty, payer or corporate against the sanctions lists published by the designating authorities themselves — the UK Sanctions List (FCDO), OFSI, the UN Security Council, the EU consolidated list and OFAC's SDN and non-SDN lists. Use when onboarding, before taking a payment, before completing a transaction, or whenever a name must be checked against sanctions. Produces candidates and provenance, never a clearance: the record names every list searched with its publication date and count, states what was NOT searched, and ends at a blank decision block. Fails closed — a cache that is missing, damaged, truncated or stale is reported NOT SEARCHED and the process exits non-zero, so nothing can read an incomplete run as clean. Matches across transliteration, diacritics, homoglyphs and initials, because nobody spells a name the way the publisher does. Standard library only; screening opens no network connection.
/plugin install sanctions-screening-matei-clej@lawve-ai - 64screening-alert-adjudication-amir-fadaviAdjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — "is this person actually on the sanctions list", "did we get a real match", "clear this alert", "I have a hit on X" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.
/plugin install screening-alert-adjudication-amir-fadavi@lawve-ai - 65serious-incident-reporting-eu-ai-act-art-73-werner-plutatSerious Incident Reporting (SIR) for high-risk AI systems under Article 73 EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Assess, qualify, draft, and submit Art. 73 SIR notifications across the four Art. 3(49) harm categories (death or serious health damage, critical infrastructure disruption, breach of fundamental rights, property or environmental damage). Covers Art. 73 immediate, 2/10/15-day reporting windows, market surveillance authority notification, deployer duties under Art. 26(5), and cross-regulation mapping with GDPR Art. 33/34 breach notification, NIS2 Art. 23 incident reporting, DORA Art. 19 ICT incident, and MDR vigilance. Built for in-house counsel and AI risk teams handling AI incidents, building AI incident response playbooks, or managing AI failure, AI bias, or automated decision incidents. DACH routing through German market surveillance (BNetzA, BaFin, BSI, BfArM, KBA). Pairs with the EU AI Act System Classifier, High-Risk Readiness, FRIA, and GPAI Code of Practice skills.
/plugin install serious-incident-reporting-eu-ai-act-art-73-werner-plutat@lawve-ai - 66soc2-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.
/plugin install soc2-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 67statute-briefer-seth-chandlerBriefs statutes and legislative Acts using the MAPS + RULES framework: a system-level map of the whole Act (citation and text status, purpose, structure, scope, definitions) plus operational rule-modules for each operative provision (elements, legal effect, exceptions, procedure, consequences, forum, interaction rules). Works from statutory text supplied by the user and never invents statutory language. Use when briefing a statute, analyzing legislative text, mapping statutory architecture, extracting the elements of a provision, or applying a statute to facts. Triggers on "brief this statute", "analyze this Act", "map the statute", "apply [statute] to [scenario]", "what are the elements of [provision]", "statutory analysis", and on references to codified sections such as 42 U.S.C. or the Texas Health and Safety Code. Two modes: (A) text-only briefing for structural analysis, and (B) scenario-driven briefing that applies provisions to specific facts with verbatim quotation and pinpoint cites.
/plugin install statute-briefer-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 68vendor-due-diligence-patrick-munroFramework for assessing IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners. Creates structured risk assessments across financial, operational, compliance, security, and reputational dimensions with regulatory checklists (GDPR, DORA, NIS2, SOX). Use when: (1) Evaluating new vendors or technology providers, (2) Conducting third-party risk assessments for procurement, (3) Performing critical vendor due diligence for regulatory compliance, (4) Creating vendor onboarding documentation, (5) Establishing ongoing vendor monitoring processes, (6) Assessing vendor concentration risk, or (7) Generating executive-level vendor risk reports.
/plugin install vendor-due-diligence-patrick-munro@lawve-ai - 69whistleblower-policy-advisor-malik-taiarGuide for (a) auditing an existing whistleblower system or (b) drafting a compliant reporting policy from a provided template. Covers EU Directive 2019/1937, the amended Sapin II law (Waserman 2022), Decree 2022-1284, CNIL guidelines, public sector requirements, and duty of vigilance.
/plugin install whistleblower-policy-advisor-malik-taiar@lawve-ai - 70assignation-refere-communication-associe-selim-brihiRédaction d'assignations en référé pour obtenir la communication forcée de documents sociaux à un associé sur le fondement de l'article L. 238-1 du code de commerce. À utiliser quand un associé se voit refuser l'accès aux comptes annuels, rapports de gestion ou PV d'assemblées.
/plugin install assignation-refere-communication-associe-selim-brihi@lawve-ai - 71contract-review-kevin-lordyReview legal contracts, NDAs, employment agreements, SaaS terms, and M&A documents. Identifies unfavorable terms, suggests redlines, and compares to market standards. Use for contract analysis, due diligence, or negotiation prep.
/plugin install contract-review-kevin-lordy@lawve-ai - 72gouvernance-societes-cotees-gillan-salehSkill open source d'analyse documentaire à vocation scientifique sur la gouvernance des sociétés cotées françaises (SBF 120). Il agrège, sous forme d'index sourcés à la page près, le corpus réglementaire et doctrinal 2020-2025 — rapports AMF et HCGE, Code AFEP-MEDEF, doctrine AMF, priorités ESMA, rapport sénatorial Rietmann/Gay, guide Paris Europlace — complété par recherche web. Sa règle fondatrice est le zéro invention : chaque chiffre, citation et page provient d'une source vérifiée, mot pour mot, en distinguant strictement le régulateur (AMF, ESMA) de la soft law (HCGE, AFEP-MEDEF). Quatre usages : restitution sourcée, analyse longitudinale, audit d'émetteur sur une grille de 13 blocs, croisement thématique multi-émetteurs. Ni conseil juridique, ni conseil en investissement.
/plugin install gouvernance-societes-cotees-gillan-saleh@lawve-ai - 73icelandic-company-formation-magnus-smarasonUse this skill when asked about forming, registering, or structuring a company in Iceland. Triggers on questions about Icelandic business entities (ehf, hf, sf, svf, ses), capital requirements, registration with Fyrirtækjaskrá, governance structures, or choosing the right entity type.
/plugin install icelandic-company-formation-magnus-smarason@lawve-ai - 74indian-foreign-investment-approval-assessment-siddhi-kudalkarAssess whether Government of India approval is required for foreign investment in an Indian company under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Non-Debt Instruments Rules, 2019. The skill systematically gathers transaction details, evaluates sectoral entry routes and caps, assesses land border country restrictions under applicable laws, and delivers a preliminary compliance note. Produces clear guidance on whether the investment falls within Automatic Route or requires Government approval.
/plugin install indian-foreign-investment-approval-assessment-siddhi-kudalkar@lawve-ai - 75extradition-case-law-search-matei-clejSearches the domestic courts of 122 jurisdictions — 153 databases, 49 automated — for extradition and arrest-warrant surrender decisions, each in its own language and vocabulary. Answers the question no commercial database does: how are OTHER executing states treating this requesting state, or this ground? Searching by requesting state localises its name per jurisdiction (AE becomes 'Emiratele Arabe Unite' in Romania, 'Emirati Arabi Uniti' in Italy), so the sweep finds what those courts actually wrote. Every hit passes a relevance gate; every search leaves a dated report, so the research is reconstructable months later. Use when asked what foreign courts have said about surrender to a given state, whether any European court has refused extradition on prison conditions, assurances or Article 3, for comparative extradition research, or to build a foreign-authority section of an extradition argument. Not for domestic case law of the user's own jurisdiction, and never a substitute for reading the judgment.
/plugin install extradition-case-law-search-matei-clej@lawve-ai - 76analyse-rgpd-de-dpa-fournisseur-hugo-salardAnalyse systématique d'un Data Processing Agreement (DPA) au regard de l'article 28 RGPD, des lignes directrices EDPB 07/2020 et 02/2024, des Clauses Contractuelles Types 2021 et du Règlement (UE) 2024/1689. Produit un rapport structuré clause par clause sur 18 critères (13 obligatoires + 5 complémentaires) avec diagnostic 🟢/🟡/🔴, analyse détaillée des transferts internationaux (tableau structuré + accès gouvernemental Cloud Act/FISA 702), vérification de l'utilisation de systèmes d'IA, remédiations contractuelles prêtes à insérer, et questions à poser au fournisseur. Pensé pour les DPO et praticiens RGPD qui négocient ou auditent des contrats de sous-traitance.
/plugin install analyse-rgpd-de-dpa-fournisseur-hugo-salard@lawve-ai - 77audit-conformite-rgpd-site-internet-hugo-salardAudit de conformité RGPD d'un site internet par un praticien RGPD/DPO. Observation systématique selon une checklist en 10 sections (mentions légales, hébergeur, formulaires, newsletter, politique de confidentialité, cookies, mots de passe, trackers, sous-traitants et transferts hors UE, accessibilité des droits) plus annexe 22 items art. 13/14 RGPD. Produit un rapport structuré (markdown, .docx en option) avec niveau de conformité global, points bloquants, points de vigilance, recommandations prioritaires et sources réglementaires citées (LCEN, RGPD, ePrivacy, délibérations CNIL, EDPB, DPF). Tool-agnostique : navigation automatique ou mode dégradé copier-coller. 7 arbres de décision pour les cas limites. Le praticien valide tous les statuts avant transmission au client. Analyse technique uniquement, pas de conseil juridique.
/plugin install audit-conformite-rgpd-site-internet-hugo-salard@lawve-ai - 78ccpa-cpra-tanaji-hemant-naikCalifornia Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance advisor — business threshold analysis, consumer rights fulfillment (access, delete, correct, opt-out of sale/sharing, limit SPI, ADMT opt-out), privacy notice drafting, service provider vs. contractor vs. third-party classification, sensitive personal information (SPI) handling, data minimization, opt-out mechanisms (including GPC), cybersecurity audits and risk assessments (live since Jan 1, 2026), ADMT obligations (effective 2026, deadline Jan 1, 2027), CPPA enforcement (Disney $2.75M, PlayOn $1.1M, Ford $375K), penalty exposure, GDPR comparison, and gap assessments for businesses operating in or targeting California residents.
/plugin install ccpa-cpra-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 79cookie-policy-generator-malik-taiarGuide for drafting cookie policies compliant with GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive. Includes CNIL 2020 recommendations, a reference template, and best practices. Use when drafting or revising a cookie policy for a website or application.
/plugin install cookie-policy-generator-malik-taiar@lawve-ai - 80data-processing-agreement-art-28-gdpr-oliver-schmidt-prietzReview, draft, or redline a Data Processing Agreement (DPA / Auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag / AVV) under Art. 28 GDPR, or prepare a Joint Controller Arrangement under Art. 26 GDPR (basic). Supports bilingual output (DE/EN), both controller- and processor-side perspectives, and two review depths — quick (Art. 28(3)(a)–(h) coverage) and negotiation-grade (clause-by-clause risk scoring).
/plugin install data-processing-agreement-art-28-gdpr-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 81dpdpa-gdpr-compliance-review-parth-desaiPerforms structured compliance review, clause redlining, and drafting suggestions for legal documents (privacy policies, data processing agreements, vendor and SaaS contracts) against India's DPDPA 2023 and the EU GDPR. Flags clauses as compliant, at-risk, or non-compliant with reasoning, and proposes ready-to-use model replacement language.
/plugin install dpdpa-gdpr-compliance-review-parth-desai@lawve-ai - 82dpdpa-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert India Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about the DPDPA, DPDP Act, DPDP Rules 2025, India data privacy law, Data Fiduciary obligations, Data Principal rights, Significant Data Fiduciary, Data Protection Board of India, consent under DPDPA, notice requirements, breach notification India, children's data India, cross-border data transfer India, India privacy compliance, DPDPA gap analysis, DPDPA vs GDPR, or any obligation under India's personal data protection framework.
/plugin install dpdpa-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 83dpia-sentinel-oliver-schmidt-prietzGDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) guidance under Article 35 GDPR, EDPB Guidelines WP 248 rev.01, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI), and national SA blacklists/whitelists. Covers threshold assessment, multi-jurisdictional blacklist checks (DE, FR, IE, BE, NL, IT, PL), 5x5 risk scoring, necessity/proportionality analysis, mitigation mapping, Art. 36 prior consultation, AI dual-phase analysis, and audit-ready .docx generation.
/plugin install dpia-sentinel-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 84gdpr-breach-sentinel-oliver-schmidt-prietzIncident response and legal compliance guidance for data breaches under GDPR Articles 33 & 34. Covers breach risk assessment using ENISA severity methodology, Controller vs Processor obligations, 72-hour notification clock management, EDPB case matching, cross-border Lead SA determination, AI Act Art. 73 intersection, mitigation playbooks, and audit-ready .docx document generation.
/plugin install gdpr-breach-sentinel-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 85gdpr-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and (4) reviewing data flows and PII handling practices. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR, data protection, privacy compliance, lawful basis, data subject rights, DPA, privacy notices, consent management, data breaches, DPIAs, controller/ processor relationships, cross-border data transfers, or any EU/UK data privacy topic.
/plugin install gdpr-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 86icelandic-privacy-review-magnus-smarasonUse this skill when asked to review data protection or privacy compliance under Icelandic law and GDPR. Triggers on requests involving personal data processing, privacy policies, DPIA assessments, kennitala handling, Persónuvernd filings, or cross-border data transfers from Iceland.
/plugin install icelandic-privacy-review-magnus-smarason@lawve-ai - 87indian-dpdp-act-consent-notice-siddhi-kudalkarDraft or review a DPDPA-compliant consent notice under India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025. Provide basic details about your business and this skill handles the rest - building a notice tailored to your operations, with all required sections, granular consent boxes, and internal notes for your team. If you have an existing notice or privacy policy that needs to comply with DPDPA, this skill revises it too, flagging key gaps and changes made.
/plugin install indian-dpdp-act-consent-notice-siddhi-kudalkar@lawve-ai - 88iso27701-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert ISO 27701 Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 27701:2025, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, privacy information management, PIMS certification, PII controller or processor obligations, privacy risk assessment, Statement of Applicability for privacy, privacy by design, data subject rights, DPIA, records of processing activities, transitioning from ISO 27701:2019, GDPR alignment with ISO 27701, or any privacy management system topic. Also trigger for questions about Annex A.1 (controller controls), A.2 (processor controls), A.3 (shared security controls), or implementing a standalone PIMS without ISO 27001. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full ISO 27701 lifecycle from gap assessment through certification.
/plugin install iso27701-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 89legitimate-interest-oliver-schmidt-prietzConducts a structured Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) under Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the full EDPB three-step test — interest identification, strict necessity analysis, and the balancing test with mitigation. Built on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), CNIL guidance (June 2025), ICO/DUA Act 2025, key CJEU judgments, and DPA positions from DE/FR/NL/AT/IT/ES/UK. Includes specialised modules for AI/ML, marketing, fraud prevention, children's data, employee monitoring, ePrivacy overlap, and cross-border, plus a dedicated Right to Object (Art. 21) response mode and structured LIA output. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR Art. 6(1)(f), legitimate interest, the LIA or three-step test, EDPB/DPA guidance, AI training data lawfulness, web scraping legality, direct marketing or fraud prevention legal basis, employee monitoring, the right to object, or asks for a balancing test — even if they don't say "LIA" explicitly.
/plugin install legitimate-interest-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 90lgpd-sentinel-rafael-mastronardiOrientação LGPD para operações de tratamento no Brasil. Cobre bases legais (Art. 7º e Art. 11), RIPD, incidentes (Arts. 48-49), direitos dos titulares (Art. 18) e transferências internacionais. Triggers: LGPD, RIPD, ANPD, proteção de dados, dados pessoais, consentimento, encarregado, DPO Brasil, incidente de dados, legítimo interesse.
/plugin install lgpd-sentinel-rafael-mastronardi@lawve-ai - 91lgpd-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert LGPD compliance advisor for Brazil's Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (Law 13,709/2018). Use this skill whenever a user asks about LGPD, Brazilian data protection, ANPD, personal data processing in Brazil, data subject rights under Brazilian law, legal bases for processing, sensitive data handling, DPO appointment in Brazil, data breach notification to ANPD, LGPD penalties (fines up to 2% of revenue / R$50M), international data transfers from Brazil, Brazil-EU mutual adequacy (January 2026 — SCCs/BCRs no longer needed for Brazil-EU transfers), LGPD gap assessments, privacy policy drafting for Brazilian operations, DPIA under LGPD, consent management, or comparing LGPD with GDPR. Trigger for any Brazil privacy or data protection question even if LGPD is not named explicitly.
/plugin install lgpd-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 92privacy-compliance-advisor-anthropicNavigate privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA), review DPAs, and handle data subject requests. Use when reviewing data processing agreements, responding to data subject access or deletion requests, assessing cross-border data transfer requirements, or evaluating privacy compliance.
/plugin install privacy-compliance-advisor-anthropic@lawve-ai - 93privacy-notice-generator-oliver-schmidt-prietzDraft GDPR-compliant privacy notices as .docx for any EU/EEA jurisdiction and audience. Supports five notice types (Website/App, Applicant, Employee, Business Partner, B2C Customer) across DE, FR, AT, IT, ES, NL, BE, IE, and UK GDPR. Covers Art. 13/14 disclosures, AI Act transparency, cookie policies, multi-language support, DPIA indicators, and post-generation compliance checklists.
/plugin install privacy-notice-generator-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 94privacy-policy-generator-malik-taiarGuide for drafting privacy policies compliant with GDPR. Includes CNIL 2020 recommendations, a reference template, and best practices. Use when drafting or revising a privacy policy for a website or application.
/plugin install privacy-policy-generator-malik-taiar@lawve-ai - 95transfer-impact-assessment-tia-oliver-schmidt-prietzGDPR Transfer Impact Assessment for Chapter V transfers under the EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology, the CNIL TIA Guide (January 2025), and EDPB essential guarantees. Handles transfer qualification, Art. 45 adequacy fast-tracks, Art. 46 full assessments with country profiles for 12 jurisdictions, and balanced Art. 49 derogation analysis. Outputs a Markdown report, a .docx formal TIA, and a JSON delta for RoPA interchange.
/plugin install transfer-impact-assessment-tia-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 96vn-pdpl-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert Vietnam Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) compliance advisor for Law No. 91/2025/QH15 and implementing Decree 356/2025/ND-CP (effective January 1, 2026). Use this skill for gap analysis against the Vietnam PDPL, data subject rights fulfilment workflows, cross-border data transfer impact assessments, privacy notices and internal policies, breach notification procedures, sector-specific obligations (finance, AI, cloud, blockchain), and DPO qualification reviews. Trigger whenever a user mentions Vietnam data privacy, VN-PDPL, Nghị định 356, Vietnamese personal data, or cross-border transfers involving Vietnamese citizens' data.
/plugin install vn-pdpl-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 97icelandic-labour-law-magnus-smarasonUse this skill when asked about Icelandic employment law, labour relations, workplace rights, or collective agreements. Triggers on questions about hiring, termination, working conditions, parental leave, trade unions, collective bargaining, workplace safety, or the Félagsdómur labour court in Iceland.
/plugin install icelandic-labour-law-magnus-smarason@lawve-ai - 98notification-licenciement-selim-brihiGuide pour la rédaction de notifications de licenciement conformes au droit du travail français. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger, préparer, créer ou éditer une lettre de notification de licenciement, notamment pour faute grave, faute lourde ou motif personnel. Le skill guide la collecte d'informations précises et la rédaction d'une notification juridiquement solide avec tous les éléments obligatoires du droit français.
/plugin install notification-licenciement-selim-brihi@lawve-ai - 99settlement-agreement-review-andrew-birdReviews or drafts the agreement that pays an employee to settle their claims — and flags the statutory conditions that decide whether it actually binds them. Works under s.203 ERA 1996 for England & Wales. Flags apparent s.203 condition gaps for a solicitor to confirm (writing, specific complaints, independent adviser, identification, insurance, statement of conditions), drafts the substantive terms (sum, tax characterisation, confidentiality, references, restrictive covenants, indemnities), and surfaces enforceability risks. Does not rule on validity and is not legal advice. Use when the user says 'review this settlement agreement', 'draft a settlement agreement', 'compromise agreement' (old term), or asks whether an agreement is binding.
/plugin install settlement-agreement-review-andrew-bird@lawve-ai - 100unfair-dismissal-screener-andrew-birdScreens a dismissal — proposed or already done — against the unfair dismissal framework for England & Wales, and shows where it is exposed. Structures the qualifying-service question, the automatically-unfair categories (no qualifying period), and a Burchell / Polkey / band-of-reasonable-responses analysis for a solicitor to verify — it does not determine fairness. Surfaces specific procedural risks. Use when the user says 'is this unfair', 'screen this dismissal', 'ordinary unfair dismissal', 'automatic unfair dismissal', or wants a structured fairness review before or after dismissal.
/plugin install unfair-dismissal-screener-andrew-bird@lawve-ai - 101csrd-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about CSRD, European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), double materiality assessment, sustainability reporting obligations, ESG disclosure, CSRD scope and thresholds, value chain reporting, XBRL digital tagging, third-party assurance, CSRD gap assessments, CSRD implementation timelines, ESRS E1–E5 environmental standards, ESRS S1–S4 social standards, ESRS G1 governance, CSRD vs GRI/TCFD/SASB alignment, or any EU corporate sustainability reporting question.
/plugin install csrd-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 102hipaa-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts. Use this skill whenever the user mentions HIPAA, PHI (Protected Health Information), ePHI, covered entities, business associates, healthcare data privacy, medical records, health information security, BAA (Business Associate Agreements), or any compliance review involving patient data. Also trigger for requests to draft privacy notices, HIPAA policies, consent forms, security risk assessments, or breach notification letters. Use for developers building healthcare software who need technical safeguard guidance (encryption, access controls, audit logs), compliance officers reviewing documents or procedures.
/plugin install hipaa-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 103central-african-special-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer“Verification-first” methodology for the Special Criminal Court of the Central African Republic, a hybrid court seated in Bangui. Every citation is verified against JusticeInfo, FIDH, HRW, and legal-tools.org; the official sites often return a 403 error. Covers the Paoua case, the word “notamment” in Article 3, and complementarity with the ICC. Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install central-african-special-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 104court-of-bih-war-crimes-chamber-jeanne-sulzerVerification-first methodology for Section I (War Crimes) of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Citations are verified against the Court of BiH, the ICTY/IRMCT archives and OSCE. Distinguishes ICTY-referred (Rule 11 bis) cases from locally-initiated ones; covers Stanković, Janković and the Maktouf lex mitior ruling. Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install court-of-bih-war-crimes-chamber-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 105eccc-khmer-rouge-tribunal-jeanne-sulzerVerification-first methodology for the ECCC (Khmer Rouge Tribunal). Every citation is verified against eccc.gov.kh, the ECCC archive or legal-tools.org. Covers Case File numbering, the 001/002/002-01/002-02 structure, the genocide findings against the Cham and the Vietnamese, and the Internal Rules revision discipline. Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install eccc-khmer-rouge-tribunal-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 106extraordinary-african-chambers-jeanne-sulzer“Verification-first” methodology for the Extraordinary African Chambers, covering the Hissène Habré trial in Dakar. Every citation is verified against forumchambresafricaines.org and legal-tools.org. Covers the judgment of May 30, 2016, the appeal judgment of April 27, 2017, reparations of CFAF 82.290 billion for 7,396 victims, and universal jurisdiction. Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install extraordinary-african-chambers-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 107icty-ictr-irmct-jeanne-sulzerVerification-first methodology for the ICTY, the ICTR and the Residual Mechanism (IRMCT). Citations are verified against irmct.org, the Case Law and Unified Court Records databases, and legal-tools.org. Handles the IT/ICTR to MICT case-number transition (Karadžić, Mladić) and the protective-measures rule. Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install icty-ictr-irmct-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 108international-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzerResearch, drafting, and analysis involving the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute system). Enforces a verification-first methodology — every case-law, decision, filing, warrant, and statement citation is verified against an authoritative primary source (icc-cpi.int, legal-tools.org) in the current conversation before it appears in an output. Foundational texts (Rome Statute, Elements of Crimes, RPE, Regulations of the Court) may be cited from project knowledge when present. Use whenever the user is working with ICC case law, OTP statements, ASP documents, or ICC procedure.
/plugin install international-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 109kosovo-specialist-chambers-jeanne-sulzerVerification-first methodology for the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office (The Hague, applying Kosovo law). Citations are verified against scp-ks.org before use; appeal registry numbers are cited only once confirmed. Covers Thaçi et al., Mustafa, Pjetër Shala and Gucati & Haradinaj. Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install kosovo-specialist-chambers-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 110nuremberg-tokyo-tribunals-jeanne-sulzerVerification-first methodology for the post-WWII tribunals: the IMT at Nuremberg, the twelve Nuremberg Military Tribunals, and the IMTFE at Tokyo. Citations are verified against the official records (Blue/Green Series, Pritchard-Zaide) and the digital archives (Avalon, Harvard NTP, UVA IMTFE). Guards the four classic traps (IMT vs NMT; Nuremberg vs Tokyo; Charter article numbers; majority judgment vs separate opinions, e.g. the Pal dissent). Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install nuremberg-tokyo-tribunals-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 111special-court-for-sierra-leone-jeanne-sulzerVerification-first methodology for the Special Court for Sierra Leone and its Residual Special Court. Citations are verified against rscsl.org and legal-tools.org. Covers Taylor, the AFRC/CDF/RUF cases, the child-soldier and forced-marriage holdings, the head-of-State immunity decision, and the fixed-term (no life) penalty regime. Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install special-court-for-sierra-leone-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 112special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jeanne-sulzerVerification-first methodology for the Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (JEP), Colombia's transitional justice court under the 2016 Acuerdo Final with FARC-EP. Citations are verified against jep.gov.co before use. Covers the 11 macrocasos (from Caso 01 secuestro through Caso 11 violencia sexual, including Caso 03 falsos positivos), the three sanction tiers (propias, alternativas, ordinarias), TOAR, and the SIVJRNR sister bodies (CEV, UBPD). Guards the key structural distinctions (Sala de Reconocimiento vs Tribunal para la Paz; comparecientes FARC-EP vs Fuerza Pública vs terceros civiles; Acto Legislativo 01/2017 vs Ley Estatutaria 1957/2019). Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 113special-panels-timor-leste-jeanne-sulzerVerification-first methodology for the Special Panels for Serious Crimes of the Dili District Court (UNTAET, 2000–2006). Citations are verified against JSMP, the UN archives and legal-tools.org. Covers the Los Palos case, the Serious Crimes Unit caseload (391 indicted; about 88 tried) and the SPSC-vs-Jakarta distinction. Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install special-panels-timor-leste-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 114special-tribunal-for-lebanon-jeanne-sulzerVerification-first methodology for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Citations are verified against the STL legacy archive and legal-tools.org. Covers the Ayyash et al. case, the two contempt cases (STL-14-05 New TV/Al-Khayat and STL-14-06 Akhbar Beirut/Al-Amin), and the 2011 terrorism decision. Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install special-tribunal-for-lebanon-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 115unmik-regulation-64-panels-jeanne-sulzerVerification-first methodology for the UNMIK Regulation 64 Panels of the Kosovo district courts (2000–2008). Citations are verified against UNMIK/EULEX archives and legal-tools.org. Keeps the Reg. 64 Panels distinct from the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, and clarifies that Reg. 2000/64 permitted (did not impose) internationally-majority panels. Research aid, not legal advice.
/plugin install unmik-regulation-64-panels-jeanne-sulzer@lawve-ai - 116wcag-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) advisor covering WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 — the W3C international accessibility standards. Use this skill whenever a user asks about WCAG success criteria, conformance levels (A/AA/AAA), accessibility audits, POUR principles, accessibility statements, ARIA patterns, colour contrast, keyboard accessibility, screen reader compatibility, mobile accessibility, cognitive accessibility, WCAG 2.2 new criteria, WCAG 3.0 preview, legal requirements referencing WCAG (EN 301 549, EAA, ADA, Section 508), or mapping WCAG to accessibility laws.
/plugin install wcag-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 117droit-etrangers-asile-el-ouertani-faouziExpertise complète en droit français des étrangers, de l'asile et de la nationalité — entrée et visas, séjour (CESEDA livre IV, AES, étranger malade, regroupement familial, métiers en tension), éloignement et contentieux (OQTF, IRTF, rétention, référés, TA/CAA/CE), asile (OFPRA, CNDA, Dublin, CMA/ADA), nationalité et droits sociaux des étrangers (AME, PUMa, RSA, AAH, ASPA). Interroge en priorité trois connecteurs MCP complémentaires — OpenLegi (textes, jurisprudence administrative), LibreJustice (recherche sémantique tous ordres) et Legal Data Hunter (rétention/JLD, graphe de citations, statut de validité) — puis les sources officielles (Légifrance, ANEF, OFPRA, CNDA) et la doctrine associative (GISTI, Cimade, ADDE, Comede, Anafé). Déclencher dès qu'une question porte sur un étranger en France, même sans vocabulaire juridique — « papier de la préfecture », « récépissé périmé », « la CAF refuse le RSA » — et pour toute consultation, recours, note ou vérification de références dans ces matières.
/plugin install droit-etrangers-asile-el-ouertani-faouzi@lawve-ai - 118originality-in-european-copyright-joris-deeneDetermines whether a given subject matter qualifies for copyright protection under EU law by applying the Cofemel two-step test (concept of work + originality), grounded in fifteen CJEU judgments (including the most recent Mio/Konektra and Calinescu) and the four EU directive provisions on originality. It argues from one of two positions: pro-rightsholder (establishing that the work is original) or pro-alleged-infringer (contesting work status or originality via the four exclusion grounds — technical function, rule-dictated outcome, sweat of the brow, idea/functionality). It includes sector-specific modules for photography, software/GUI, sporting events, databases, applied art, functional texts, derivative works/critical editions, and multimedia works.
/plugin install originality-in-european-copyright-joris-deene@lawve-ai - 119trademark-search-robb-millerRun an attorney-facing knockout/availability trademark search across the United States and Canada. Use whenever a user (founder, client, or attorney) asks whether a brand, mark, name, logo, slogan, or product name is "available," "free to use," "clearable," or "already taken" — or asks Claude to "search the trademark register," "check USPTO," "check CIPO," "do a knockout search," "clearance search," "availability search," or "see if [mark] is trademarked." Trigger even when the user phrases it casually ("can I call my company X?", "is this name taken?"). Covers federal USPTO (TESS/TSDR), federal Canada (CIPO), common-law/web/state, and WIPO Madrid international. Output is a knockout availability memo with green/yellow/red verdict for attorney review. Includes professional-responsibility gating (AI-use disclosure, conflict check, scope confirmation) before substantive analysis. Not legal advice — produces work product for attorney sign-off.
/plugin install trademark-search-robb-miller@lawve-ai - 120customs-trade-law-onur-kafkasU.S. customs and trade-law research assistant for HTS classification, CROSS ruling research, CIT/CAFC decision briefing, duty compilation (General + Special + Chapter 99 + AD/CVD + MPF/HMF), country of origin determination, FTA qualification, and end-to-end import compliance review. Triggers on product classification, tariff questions, customs rulings, trade remedy screening (Section 301/232/201), Partner Government Agency admissibility, and UFLPA forced-labor analysis. Produces attorney-reviewable draft work product with an enforced HTSUS authority hierarchy and explicit evidence ledger.
/plugin install customs-trade-law-onur-kafkas@lawve-ai - 121icelandic-eea-gap-analysis-magnus-smarasonUse this skill when asked to analyze how Iceland has implemented an EU directive or regulation into national law, identify gaps between EU/EEA law and Icelandic implementation, or assess Iceland's compliance with EEA obligations. Triggers on questions about EEA transposition, ESA infringement, or EU-Iceland legal gaps.
/plugin install icelandic-eea-gap-analysis-magnus-smarason@lawve-ai - 122canned-response-generator-anthropicGenerate templated responses for common legal inquiries and identify when situations require individualized attention. Use when responding to routine legal questions — data subject requests, vendor inquiries, NDA requests, discovery holds — or when managing response templates.
/plugin install canned-response-generator-anthropic@lawve-ai - 123client-explanation-translator-larissa-meredith-flisterTurn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or correspondence — and wants it converted into something a client can actually understand and act on. Trigger on phrases like 'explain this to the client', 'put this in plain English', 'translate this for a non-lawyer', 'turn this into client-facing advice', 'make this client-ready', 'draft a client update', or when the user shares legal analysis and asks 'what does this mean for them'. Also trigger when the user wants a board summary, litigation risk update, or call script derived from legal material. The skill preserves legal nuance, uncertainty, and risk rather than oversimplifying — it makes advice usable, not just simpler.
/plugin install client-explanation-translator-larissa-meredith-flister@lawve-ai - 124connecticut-divorce-planner-stephane-boghossianClaude skill that turns Claude into a Connecticut-specific divorce planner — nine operating modes from pre-flight intake to post-judgment modification, modeled on Untangle.us's feature surface and grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b, Practice Book Chapter 25, and the 2026-08-01 CCSG schedule. Covers eligibility triage (nonadversarial under § 46b-44a vs standard), financial affidavit (JD-FM-6), child support (JD-FM-220 / CCSG-1 / 1A), alimony (§ 46b-82 fourteen factors), parenting plan (with GAL/AMC escalation under JD-FM-224), settlement agreement (JD-FM-172, TCJA-aware), filing packet (marshal 12-day rule, $360 + $50 fees, JD-FM-75 waiver), and post-judgment motion practice. Hard UPL gate: refuses non-CT, domestic violence (refers CTCADV 1-888-774-2900), hidden assets, courtroom advocacy. Heppner-aware: AI prompts are not privileged. First family-law skill in the Lawvable registry.
/plugin install connecticut-divorce-planner-stephane-boghossian@lawve-ai - 125divorce-practice-stephane-boghossianAI co-counsel for divorce and family-law attorneys — a jurisdiction-portable scaffold spanning the full matter lifecycle. Eight operating modes mirror how a matter actually moves: intake and onboarding, financial disclosure, children and support, property division and QDRO, discovery and document review, drafting, negotiation and mediation prep, and court prep — plus post-judgment modification and enforcement. The methodology is jurisdiction-agnostic: it forces real, verifiable research for every local form, formula, or rule rather than inventing one, handling common-law, community-property, civil-law, and MENA personal-status regimes as variables. Built around one non-negotiable: privilege. It drafts, analyzes, organizes, and pressure-tests. It is not the lawyer.
/plugin install divorce-practice-stephane-boghossian@lawve-ai - 126en-uk-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-bergA skill for anyone needing legal documents translated into publication-ready English. Hand it a Word file in any language; get back an English .docx with formatting preserved, delivering notably higher quality than e.g. Legora’s DeepL tool. Unique features: * Skill has built-in English general lexicons and per-language sub-lexicons (phrasebooks) covering M&A, IP, IT/SaaS, finance, tax, litigation, employment and more. Full sub-lexicon coverage for 11 languages including Spanish, German, French and Chinese; others translate really well too. * Track changes read correctly when accepted or rejected, and typos are collapsed. * Definitions reordered alphabetically. * Headers, footers, footnotes and comments translated. * Translates to UK English by default, US English on request. * Quality gates throughout. * Takes minutes rather than seconds and is larger than simpler skills, but overall quality is higher. US English default version here: https://lawve.ai/en/skills/en-us-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-berg
/plugin install en-uk-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-berg@lawve-ai - 127en-us-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-bergA skill for anyone needing legal documents translated into publication-ready English. Hand it a Word file in any language; get back an English .docx with formatting preserved, delivering notably higher quality than e.g. Legora’s DeepL tool. Unique features: * Skill has built-in English general lexicons and per-language sub-lexicons (phrasebooks) covering M&A, IP, IT/SaaS, finance, tax, litigation, employment and more. Full sub-lexicon coverage for 11 languages including Spanish, German, French and Chinese; others translate really well too. * Track changes read correctly when accepted/rejected, and typos are collapsed. * Definitions reordered alphabetically. * Headers, footers, footnotes and comments translated. * Translates to US English by default, UK English on request. * Quality gates throughout. * Takes minutes rather than seconds and is larger than simpler skills, but overall quality is higher. UK English default version here: https://lawve.ai/en/skills/legal-translation-uk-english-wouter-van-den-berg
/plugin install en-us-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-berg@lawve-ai - 128fintech-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossianAn end-to-end method for drafting and finalising a complex, multi-pillar regulated fintech agreement — from intake to signature. Authored from a senior fintech lawyer's manual: a licensed payment-services provider engaging a counterparty across agent cash-in/cash-out, QR payments, wallet e-payments, and a marketplace, each with its own regulatory profile. Runs five phases and fourteen steps: regulatory mapping (activity-to-licence matrix, grey-zone classification gates), architecture (framework-plus-sub-agreement structure, ring-fenced marketplace), the regulatory–commercial balance (what flexes vs what cannot), core drafting (authority, float mechanics, hard-coded regulator caps, liability — all tracking control), execution-blocker triage, and a pre-signature check closing open blockers as conditions precedent. It refuses to invent licence-specific values or draft a representation as true without executed evidence. Use it to structure, draft, negotiate, or review any regulated payments contract.
/plugin install fintech-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian@lawve-ai - 129footnote-relegator-seth-chandlerCondense a scholarly legal article by moving nonessential detail from the body into substantive footnotes while preserving every word and keeping the argument self-sufficient. Handles Markdown and Word (.docx), integrates moved material with existing notes, measures a user-specified relegation fraction (25% by default), and delivers a move-by-move memo. Use when asked to "push detail into footnotes," "relegate to footnotes," "footnote the caveats," "move the digressions down," or tighten a dense draft without deleting content. Word output requires file access plus document-conversion and rendering support; when those capabilities are unavailable, deliver Markdown and the memo or ask for a convertible source.
/plugin install footnote-relegator-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 130founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossianA drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage → pre-signature check) and REVIEW (audit an existing agreement against an 18-clause checklist and red-flag scan). It handles the highest-dispute terms first-class: the equity split as documented reasoning (not a fake calculator), reverse vesting and the 83(b) clock, present-tense IP assignment (the Stanford v. Roche trap), leaver buyback and dead equity, and the deadlock clause most tools omit. It drafts for the venture, never one founder against another. Not legal advice.
/plugin install founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian@lawve-ai - 131humaniseur-juridique-gary-haasLes LLM écrivent du juridique qui ressemble à du juridique sans en être. Formules creuses, attributions vagues, hedging systématique, latin décoratif : un praticien repère ces tics en trois lignes. Un juge aussi. Ce skill scanne 17 patterns typiques de l'écriture IA appliquée au droit français (conclusions, consultations, notes, mails, actes) et réécrit chaque passage pour retrouver le ton d'un avocat qui argumente, pas d'un modèle qui rédige. Le résultat : un texte engagé, précis, avec des références sourcées et une position claire. Pas un texte neutre qui "reste à disposition pour tout complément".
/plugin install humaniseur-juridique-gary-haas@lawve-ai - 132irac-prompt-builder-stephane-boghossianRestructure any rough build, research, or legal-drafting request into an IRAC-shaped prompt — Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion — optimized for a frontier model. It's the bar-exam framework, repurposed as prompt engineering. The skill leads with the issue and ends with the conclusion (where models weight attention most), forces you to name your constraints and non-goals, and specifies what "good" looks like before a single token is generated. Use it before any non-trivial build, or whenever a vague ask deserves a precise brief.
/plugin install irac-prompt-builder-stephane-boghossian@lawve-ai - 133legal-design-assessment-mirza-chiragovAudits a legal document against legal design principles. Scores the document on six pillars: language patterns (bureaucratese, archaisms, passive voice, nominalization), readability (Flesch Reading Ease and language-specific equivalents), structure and navigation, hidden conditions (material obligations buried away from their headings), statutory duplication (restating the law instead of citing it), and visual hierarchy where layout is available. Assessment-only; does not rewrite the document. Works on English, French, and German documents, inferring the applicable jurisdiction from the document's language and textual signals: governing-law clause, statute citations, party addresses. Use when a user shares a legal document (contract, NDA, T&C, privacy policy, internal policy) asking how good the drafting is from a legal design perspective, whether it is readable, whether it contains buried clauses or restates the law, or how it scores on Flesch / LIX / Amstad / Kandel-Moles readability metrics.
/plugin install legal-design-assessment-mirza-chiragov@lawve-ai - 134legal-document-drafting-alessandro-dardanoProduces properly-formatted legal documents in Word (.docx). The user provides the substantive content (instructions, attached files, project knowledge); the skill handles document architecture and formatting. * No precedent or template required * Seven document families: agreements, corporate documents, litigation, memos, employment, policies, correspondence * Jurisdiction-agnostic — works across any legal system the user specifies * Multi-Chain numbering, defined-terms convention, structured recitals, atomic signature blocks * Also reformats existing .docx to a consistent house style * Works in Claude.ai, Cowork, and Claude for Word
/plugin install legal-document-drafting-alessandro-dardano@lawve-ai - 135persuasive-legal-writing-larissa-meredith-flisterApply elite legal writing techniques drawn from Justice Kagan, Boies & Olson, and other top advocates to any legal document — briefs, submissions, letters, opinions, memos, or persuasive correspondence. Covers both prose craft (clarity, concrete examples, parallel construction, voice, strategic quoting) and architectural strategy (argument sequencing, framing, openings, endings), plus a dedicated section on detecting and removing AI-sounding patterns from legal prose. Use whenever drafting, editing, or sharpening any legal document that needs to genuinely persuade, not just be technically correct.
/plugin install persuasive-legal-writing-larissa-meredith-flister@lawve-ai - 136source-locked-verification-larissa-meredith-flisterForces Claude to answer only from user-provided materials and online sources it has actually accessed. No inference, no assumptions, no gap-filling. Every factual, legal, numerical, or procedural claim must be anchored to a cited source, with statements categorised as expressly stated, verified online, supported, not found, or labelled inference. Built for legal and evidential work where fidelity to the record matters more than completeness.
/plugin install source-locked-verification-larissa-meredith-flister@lawve-ai - 137tabular-review-antoine-louisGuide to analyze multiple documents (PDF, DOCX) against user-defined columns and produce a structured Excel output with citations. Use when the user wants to: (1) Extract specific information from multiple documents into a table, (2) Compare clauses or provisions across contracts, (3) Create a document review matrix with source citations.
/plugin install tabular-review-antoine-louis@lawve-ai - 138california-bar-complete-robb-millerGuide for end-to-end California Bar Exam prep — the five essays (13 subjects), the 90-minute Performance Test, and the 200-question MBE (7 subjects). Built by a practicing attorney who used it to compress four months of prep into a week and a half.
/plugin install california-bar-complete-robb-miller@lawve-ai - 139case-briefer-seth-chandlerProduces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion analysis, five future-application hypotheticals, critique, and verified key quotations. Also builds vote tables, cross-case consistency tables, perspective-based critiques, and LaTeX in article, Beamer and casebook-chapter formats. Use whenever someone asks to brief a case, analyse or explain an opinion, summarise a decision for students, generate hypotheticals from a holding, critique a judgment, tabulate how justices voted, or convert case analysis to LaTeX. Triggers on "brief this case", "case brief", "explain the holding", "what did the court hold", "hypotheticals based on", "critique this opinion", "vote table", "Beamer presentation", "chapter brief", and on any reference to a judicial opinion or Supreme Court decision in a teaching context. Requires web search to verify quotations, votes and holdings.
/plugin install case-briefer-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 140jev-question-translator-seth-chandlerTurns a legal question, a set of draft questions, or source material such as a statute, jury instruction, rubric, contract checklist, or coding manual into a battery of narrow questions that TypeSafe's Jev, a fast classifier that returns probabilities rather than prose, can answer reliably across many documents. The skill breaks conclusions such as negligence, felony murder, or standing into element-level questions, writes the governing rule into each question, and delivers the questions alone, in Jev's request format or in plain English. Built for legal work that asks the same questions of many texts: coding statutes across jurisdictions, coding opinions or case files for empirical research, checking contracts against a review checklist, screening intake narratives, and grading student work against a rubric. Use when asked to write Jev questions, build a classifier for legal documents, or turn a legal test into yes-or-no questions. Running the questions requires Jev access; writing them does not.
/plugin install jev-question-translator-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 141law-review-editor-seth-chandlerRigorous multi-pass editor for law review articles, student notes, seminar papers and other legal scholarship. Runs six specialized passes — structure, substantive critique, Bluebook citations, grammar and clarity, fact-checking against sources, and a synthesizing memo — and delivers an editorial memo with issues prioritized as critical, substantial or minor and keyed to specific footnotes and paragraphs. Handles articles of any length, including 50,000-word pieces, by chunking on section boundaries. Reads .docx directly. Use when editing, critiquing, workshopping or pre-submission-reviewing academic legal writing. Triggers on "edit my article," "review this draft," "critique my note," "check my Bluebook citations," "is my argument sound," "read my law review piece," "workshop this paper," "pre-submission review." Chunking needs Python 3; fact-checking needs web search; both degrade gracefully without.
/plugin install law-review-editor-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 142legal-ai-simulator-patrick-munroFramework for demonstrating AI capabilities in legal contexts. Provides detailed personas across tenant law, business contracts, startup disputes, employment claims, and consumer protection with progressive complexity scenarios. Use when: (1) Demonstrating AI-powered legal triage or intake systems, (2) Showcasing responsible AI-assisted client interactions, (3) Training staff on appropriate AI use in legal contexts, (4) Creating realistic scenarios for legal tech presentations, (5) Developing educational materials about AI in legal services, or (6) Testing AI-powered legal information systems in controlled environments.
/plugin install legal-ai-simulator-patrick-munro@lawve-ai - 143legal-test-builder-patrick-munroBuilds a high-fidelity interactive legal assessment as a single self-contained HTML artifact. Output includes a live countdown timer, contract review tasks with hover-annotated problem clauses, candidate answer textareas, model answers hidden behind reveal blocks, scenario-based legal memo tasks, strategy and function-building questions, and a pre-submission checklist that encodes the marking criteria. Use when the user needs to (1) assess a legal candidate with a realistic timed exercise, (2) train or onboard junior lawyers using problem sets rather than doctrine, (3) help a candidate prepare for a real take-home assessment they are facing, (4) build educational materials for law students, in-house teams, or compliance training, or (5) produce scenario-based training modules on specific legal topics. Triggers on "legal test", "take-home", "mock exam", "contract redline exercise", "candidate assessment", "legal training exercise", "practice test", or similar phrasing even when informal.
/plugin install legal-test-builder-patrick-munro@lawve-ai - 144mandarinat-christophe-quezel-ambrunazAssistant académique pour enseignants-chercheurs en droit. Six tâches : (1) recherche juridique approfondie avec accent doctrinal, (2) relecture de documents avec vérification des références, commentaires Word, détection d'indices de plagiat/IA et cohérence argumentative, (3) création de sujets et corrigés d'exercices juridiques universitaires, (4) mise à jour de cours, ouvrages et documents juridiques, (5) création de cours avec support docx et PPTX, (6) préparation de fiches de TD.
/plugin install mandarinat-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz@lawve-ai - 145mediation-problem-generator-seth-chandlerCreate original, competition-ready commercial mediation problems and confidential packets with iterative validation. Use when a user provides a topic, industry, dispute sketch, or existing general-information packet and wants a public packet plus confidential packets for both sides—or one named side. Build a narrow but workable settlement corridor; verify factual and numerical consistency, information asymmetry, balance, originality, and commercial feasibility; and revise until deterministic and semantic exit criteria pass. Do not use merely to summarize an existing packet or to advise parties in a real dispute. Requires local file access; Python 3 is recommended for bundled deterministic checks, with disclosed manual fallbacks when unavailable.
/plugin install mediation-problem-generator-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 146mediation-problem-validator-seth-chandlerEvaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, numerical, chronological, authority, commercial-logic, or confidentiality defects; test mediation usefulness, BATNAs, settlement corridors, information asymmetry, and opportunities for firmness, cooperation, imagination, and clarification; or produce an author-only validation report. Perform a qualified partial review when packets are missing. Diagnose by default; do not generate a new problem or edit source packets unless repairs are expressly requested. Requires access to all supplied files and a host capable of reading their formats; otherwise disclose the unreviewed material and resulting limits.
/plugin install mediation-problem-validator-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 147note-de-synthese-crfpa-allison-fiorentinoGénération de sujets d'entraînement complets pour l'épreuve de NOTE DE SYNTHÈSE (5 heures, coefficient 3) de l'examen d'accès au CRFPA : choix du sujet, dossier documentaire de 16 à 20 documents assemblé à partir de sources réelles vérifiées (textes, jurisprudence, travaux parlementaires, doctrine) avec contrôle du verbatim, puis grille de notation au modèle de la Commission nationale (résumé de chaque document, problématique, thèmes cotés sur 20, plan). Livraison en deux fichiers .docx distincts, le sujet et la grille. Si l'utilisateur n'impose pas de sujet, en chercher un dans l'actualité juridique. Mode aveugle pour l'étudiant qui compose sans rien voir du corrigé. Déclencher dès que l'utilisateur demande un sujet de note de synthèse, un dossier documentaire, une note de synthèse blanche, un entraînement à l'épreuve de 5 heures du CRFPA ou de l'IEJ, ou une grille de note de synthèse. NE PAS déclencher pour les épreuves de 3 heures (sujet-crfpa-toutes-matieres) ni pour la correction de copies.\n
/plugin install note-de-synthese-crfpa-allison-fiorentino@lawve-ai - 148qcm-generateur-christophe-quezel-ambrunazGénération assistée de QCM (questionnaires à choix multiples) avec export vers Moodle (GIFT, XML), Wooclap (Excel), Kahoot! et Word. Supporte QCM légers (ludiques) et approfondis (évaluatifs), à choix unique et réponses multiples.
/plugin install qcm-generateur-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz@lawve-ai - 149reader-first-technical-edit-seth-chandlerEdit mathematically, empirically, or technically dense papers for readers outside the author’s specialty, including empirical legal scholarship, law-and-economics models, and legal-technology research. Clarifies terminology, antecedents, study design, and claim–statistic relationships while checking equations, numbers, quotations, and citations against the source. Use to clarify exposition or de-jargonize a technical draft; not to rewrite briefs or doctrinal arguments. Produces an edited draft and audit memo. Full integrity checks and original-format rendering require suitable extraction, code execution, and document tools; otherwise provides proposed edits with verification limits disclosed.
/plugin install reader-first-technical-edit-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 150relecteur-christophe-quezel-ambrunazOptimise Claude pour la relecture des textes en français, qu'ils soient littéraires, techniques, professionnels... Vérification de la grammaire, de l'orthographe, traque des barbarismes, suggestions de modifications stylistiques.
/plugin install relecteur-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz@lawve-ai - 151sujet-crfpa-allison-fiorentinoCe skill génère des sujets d'entraînement pour les deux épreuves écrites de consultation du CRFPA : l'épreuve de droit des obligations (tronc commun) et l'épreuve de spécialité (civil, affaires, social, pénal, administratif, international et européen, fiscal). Chaque sujet est accompagné d'une grille de notation détaillée sur 20 points. Vous ciblez un thème précis, ou vous laissez le skill procéder à un tirage au sort couvrant l'ensemble du programme. Connexion aux MCP OpenLegi et GoodLegal requise : toutes les références d'articles et d'arrêts sont vérifiées sur les sources officielles, sans citation inventée
/plugin install sujet-crfpa-allison-fiorentino@lawve-ai - 152thesis-assesor-seth-chandlerCritically assess and improve a legal scholarly thesis, article idea, student note, seminar-paper claim, or research agenda using Eugene Volokh's novelty, nonobviousness, utility, and soundness framework, connector-aware research, claim-specific tests, and a sustainable adversarial pass. Produces a self-contained green-, yellow-, or red-light report. Use when a law professor or law student asks whether a claim is viable, novel, publishable, preempted, useful, worth pursuing, or better than competing topics; or wants a thesis stress-tested, narrowed, repaired, or compared. No connector is required: use connected legal and scholarly research when available, public sources otherwise, and disclose any no-research fallback.
/plugin install thesis-assesor-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 153agentic-delegation-audit-adrian-lererUse when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on someone's behalf: send messages, search, draft, file, pay, delete, connect to accounts, use tools, or rely on external data. Produces a practical delegation, oversight, accountability, and control audit for legal operations.
/plugin install agentic-delegation-audit-adrian-lerer@lawve-ai - 154ambiguity-report-seth-chandlerTurn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page site, a self-contained single-file HTML page, a Word document, a PowerPoint deck, or LaTeX source. Use whenever a user has a stress-test result, ambiguity audit, or "where will this be litigated" scenarios and wants to publish, present, or share them. Triggers on "publish the audit," "make a report from this," "turn this into a website / deck / brief / Word doc," "make a Netlify site," "build slides of these ambiguities," "render the scenarios," "package this stress test," "produce a LaTeX version," and similar. Pairs with the ambiguity-stress-test skill (the underlying analysis) but works on any structured or semi-structured ambiguity analysis. Design is opinionated but colors, fonts and brand label are overridable. Most formats need Python and a writable filesystem; single-file HTML works where the host has neither.
/plugin install ambiguity-report-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 155billable-time-stephane-boghossianWhen your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.
/plugin install billable-time-stephane-boghossian@lawve-ai - 156billing-cycle-manager-scott-margettsOperational billing execution for legal matters. Monthly bill prep and billing instructions, LC invoice review and disbursement treatment, client billing query responses, cashflow modelling, and leverage and burn analysis (staffing mix, predicted total cost, margin trajectory).
/plugin install billing-cycle-manager-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 157budget-and-fee-manager-scott-margettsBuild, monitor, and adjust fee budgets across the full matter lifecycle. At matter setup: translate scope into a phase-based fee estimate with contingency and AFA structure. In flight: run WIP reviews that explain variance, not just report it. When scope changes are confirmed: model the financial impact.
/plugin install budget-and-fee-manager-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 158collaboration-platform-advisor-scott-margettsCollaboration platform configuration methodology for legal matter sites. Site architecture, workflow identification, dashboard design, data quality governance, and user adoption for SharePoint, Teams, and equivalent platforms. Outputs are platform-agnostic enough to brief IT or build simple automations.
/plugin install collaboration-platform-advisor-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 159continuous-improvement-engine-scott-margettsCapture, structure, and recycle lessons from active and closed legal matters. Three modes: in-flight capture (triggered by scope changes, risk events, status updates), mid-matter review (phase gates or quarterly), and matter close retrospective. Lessons are formatted for immediate reuse, not filed and forgotten.
/plugin install continuous-improvement-engine-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 160decision-ownership-audit-adrian-lererAudits AI-assisted legal, compliance, governance, and institutional decisions before reliance to determine whether the responsible human or institution has enough access to the evidence, reasoning basis, uncertainty, authority, and review path to genuinely own the decision rather than merely approve, sign, or transmit it.
/plugin install decision-ownership-audit-adrian-lerer@lawve-ai - 161document-approval-tracker-scott-margettsApproval cascade definition and tracking for multi-stakeholder document workflows. Internal review sequences, client approval workflows, regulatory review, overdue chasing with escalation logic, version control coordination, and cross-jurisdiction document dependencies.
/plugin install document-approval-tracker-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 162eardraft-seth-chandlerTransforms reading-oriented prose into listening-optimized text for flat, neutral vocal delivery — TTS, podcasts, audiobooks, CLE audio. Carries a legal layer: case citations, section symbols, subsection lettering, Latin terms and footnotes are unspeakable as written, so a brief, opinion, statute, contract or memo needs them expanded, restructured or stripped before it can be listened to — and quoted authority is never rewritten. Use when converting written content for audio, preparing oral argument by ear, producing CLE or client-facing audio, or making a document listenable on a commute. Triggers on "make this listenable," "convert for audio," "optimize for reading aloud," "prepare for TTS," "make an audio version," "podcast script," "read this aloud." Supports English, French, Spanish, Italian, German and Portuguese; outputs plain text, ElevenLabs audio tags, or SSML for Amazon Polly, Google or Azure.
/plugin install eardraft-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 163engagement-terms-billing-guidelines-scott-margettsDrafts, reviews, and maintains outside counsel guidelines (OCGs) — the operational document that sets expectations for how external law firms bill, staff, communicate, and deliver legal services. OCGs are the single lowest-cost, highest-impact intervention available to an in-house legal ops function. 60% of in-house teams don't have them. Of the 40% that do, 87% barely enforce them. This skill encodes the methodology for building OCGs calibrated to the team's maturity level and producing the internal business case to get them adopted.
/plugin install engagement-terms-billing-guidelines-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 164epistemic-fault-line-audit-adrian-lererAudits legal AI outputs, prompts, skills, workflows and MCP/tool instructions for fluent but unsupported reasoning, missing evidence, overconfidence, hidden assumptions, weak causal links and absent human-review gates.
/plugin install epistemic-fault-line-audit-adrian-lerer@lawve-ai - 165fee-arrangement-structuring-scott-margettsAFA design, scope-to-fee matching, negotiation preparation, health check, and scope dispute assessment for in-house legal ops teams managing outside counsel arrangements. Design fee structures (fixed, capped, collar, blended, phased, success). Assess whether scope supports a proposed AFA. Prepare commercial positions for fee negotiations. Review existing AFAs against delivery data. Assess OOS claims and build dispute response. Trigger on: 'structure the fee', 'move off hourly', 'design an AFA', 'does scope support a fixed fee?', 'negotiate the fee', 'renegotiate the arrangement', 'is our AFA holding?', 'fee health check', 'cap is being approached', 'firm is claiming OOS', 'is this in scope?', 'is this OOS?', 'AI should reduce the cost', 'blended rate vs fixed', 'collar arrangement', 'phased fees'.
/plugin install fee-arrangement-structuring-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 166invoice-review-compliance-scott-margettsReviews outside counsel invoices against billing guidelines, flags non-compliant entries by category, and produces the documents needed to approve, reduce, reject, and communicate those decisions. Covers the full invoice compliance workflow: line-item review through to formal firm escalation. Works with or without an e-billing platform. Where an e-billing system is in place, LEDES format and UTBMS coding are hard gates. Where there is no e-billing system, invoice submission by email is the channel and UTBMS coding is a best-efforts flag.
/plugin install invoice-review-compliance-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 167legal-diagram-sam-zhaiTurns dense legal documents, matter notes, and brainstorming dumps into clear, editable Mermaid diagrams to make strategizing and communicating clearer and faster. Use timelines and Gantt charts to uncover chronology gaps, flowcharts and decision trees to map litigation paths and negotiation possibilities, and entity relationship or class diagrams to clarify ownership, control, and corporate structure. Upload source files (.md, .docx, .pdf, .xlsx, or .pptx), paste text, or describe the issue you’re working on. /legal-diagram guides you through a simple interactive process to setup the skill and create timelines, Gantt charts, org charts, obligation checklists, litigation flowcharts, decision trees, corporate structure diagrams, and more.
/plugin install legal-diagram-sam-zhai@lawve-ai - 168legal-guidance-vault-michael-cremataHelps a lawyer build and use a personalized Legal Guidance Vault — a local folder of structured, privilege-marked entries capturing legal guidance they've given, searchable later by topic, person, or product. Use this skill when the user says "set up my vault," "archive this meeting/email/thread/doc," "log the guidance I gave on [topic]," "save my notes from [meeting]," "what did I say about [topic]," "find the time I advised [person] on [topic]," or "search my vault for [topic]." Runs a setup interview to learn the user's tool stack (meeting notes, calendar, email, docs, messaging, vault location), then generates a customized vault prompt they can reuse in any future Claude session to start archiving and retrieving guidance.
/plugin install legal-guidance-vault-michael-cremata@lawve-ai - 169legal-mdl-audit-adrian-lererAudits legal AI outputs and workflows for honest compression: unnecessary complexity, false simplicity, excessive caveats, hidden uncertainty and poor cost per legally acceptable output.
/plugin install legal-mdl-audit-adrian-lerer@lawve-ai - 170legal-transition-audit-adrian-lererAudits the transition from legal AI output to reliance, recommendation, execution, or real-world commitment. Use it before an AI-generated analysis, memo, contract review, compliance finding, or workflow output is acted upon to check whether authority, evidence, mandate, uncertainty, procedure, and review conditions remain sufficient.
/plugin install legal-transition-audit-adrian-lerer@lawve-ai - 171local-counsel-manager-scott-margettsEnd-to-end external local counsel lifecycle management for multi-jurisdiction legal matters. LC selection criteria and capability assessment, engagement setup and instruction design, performance monitoring and check-in cadence, scope enforcement, and relationship escalation.
/plugin install local-counsel-manager-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 172matter-allocation-instruction-scott-margettsExecutes matter allocation and firm engagement from firm selection through to a live, properly-instructed matter. Match the right firm to a new matter using the right-sourcing framework. Produce a complete matter instruction ready to send. Generate the onboarding checklist that closes conflict clearance, engagement letter, OCG, and e-billing gates. Audit an existing instruction for gaps with a remediation note ready to send. This is the execution layer for a matter that has been sourced. Panel-design-selection (Skill 2) defines which firms are on the panel. RFP-pitch-management (Skill 3) selects firms through a competitive process. This skill instructs the selected firm and closes the onboarding gates.
/plugin install matter-allocation-instruction-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 173matter-intake-scoping-scott-margettsMatter scoping across the full pre-execution arc — organise client data into a structured brief, capture the agreed baseline, or reconstruct scope mid-flight. Use when making sense of client information before a proposal, scoping a new matter, running a kickoff, defining scope, mapping stakeholders, or inheriting a matter mid-flight.
/plugin install matter-intake-scoping-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 174matter-plan-builder-scott-margettsConvert agreed scope into a structured matter plan — phases, workstreams, milestones, dependencies, owner assignments, and matter setup decisions. Use when planning a new matter, running a kickoff, building a workstream plan, structuring phases, or producing a plan to drive status reporting.
/plugin install matter-plan-builder-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 175meeting-briefing-preparator-anthropicPrepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance and track resulting action items. Use when preparing for contract negotiations, board meetings, compliance reviews, or any meeting where legal context, background research, or action tracking is needed.
/plugin install meeting-briefing-preparator-anthropic@lawve-ai - 176oral-argument-stephane-boghossianTribunal-prep skill modeled on Neal Katyal's Nov 2025 SCOTUS tariffs argument and his AI sparring partner "Harvey." Five phases: (1) profile each decision-maker from prior opinions, questions, concurrences, and dissents — surface their doctrinal commitments and institutional concerns; (2) predict the bench — 3–7 likely questions per judge with the worry behind each, verbatim phrasing where confidence is high; (3) map escape routes — the narrowest holding each skeptical judge could sign without abandoning prior commitments; (4) spar adversarially — relentless follow-ups, calls out parroted lines, tracks which questions broke the lawyer; (5) hand the lawyer back to themselves with a < 150-word index card for the podium. The model is the sparring partner. The lawyer still wins the case. Use for oral argument, motion hearings, depositions, arbitrations, or stress-testing a brief before filing.
/plugin install oral-argument-stephane-boghossian@lawve-ai - 177outside-counsel-billing-and-performance-reviewer-carl-ditzlerReviews outside counsel invoices and related billing data for an in-house legal department, including LEDES or e-billing exports, OCGs, approved rates, discounts, budgets, AFAs, and staffing rules. Starts with internal comparisons before bringing in external data. Produces invoice review findings, MBR/QBR scorecards, dispute logs, and management reports. For demonstration purposes only and not professional advice.
/plugin install outside-counsel-billing-and-performance-reviewer-carl-ditzler@lawve-ai - 178panel-design-selection-scott-margettsDesigns panel structures, defines firm selection criteria, runs right-sourcing analysis, and assesses coverage gaps for in-house legal teams building or formalising their outside counsel panel. Panel design is not panel review. Design asks: what should the panel look like? Review asks: is the panel performing? This skill builds the framework. Panel-review-rationalisation (Skill 8) measures against it.
/plugin install panel-design-selection-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 179panel-review-rationalisation-scott-margettsExecutes the annual panel review cycle and ongoing panel governance decisions. Synthesises performance scorecard data, billing compliance records, and step-out patterns into panel-level recommendations. Produces the documentation for firm exits, coverage gap assessment, and competitive refresh processes. Covers the full panel governance workflow: annual health assessment through to firm exit and slot refresh.
/plugin install panel-review-rationalisation-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 180performance-scorecard-scott-margettsPerformance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Encodes the methodology for collecting, aggregating, and acting on firm performance data across the relationship lifecycle — from building the initial evaluation framework through to the comparative analysis that informs panel retention and exit decisions.
/plugin install performance-scorecard-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 181resource-planner-scott-margettsTeam structure, gearing analysis, continuity planning, and competing demand management for legal matters. Use when setting up a matter team, reviewing whether work is being done at the right grade, planning cover for an unavailable team member, or managing a resource conflict across matters.
/plugin install resource-planner-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 182rfp-pitch-management-scott-margettsRuns structured RFP processes for selecting outside counsel — from drafting the initial document through evaluating firm responses and producing a defensible selection recommendation for GC sign-off. An average law firm spends 47 hours on an RFP response. That cost gets built into the price of legal services. Poorly structured RFPs produce responses that are incomparable and select by default for the most polished proposal, not the best firm. This skill encodes the methodology for running processes that produce genuine comparability and defensible decisions.
/plugin install rfp-pitch-management-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 183risk-and-issues-manager-scott-margettsRAID log methodology with decision extraction from emails and meeting notes. Use when asked to identify risks, log assumptions, track issues, extract decisions from correspondence, create or update a RAID log, escalate a risk to an issue, assess project risks, validate or challenge assumptions, or capture scope-relevant decisions. Also triggers when the user pastes email chains and asks what decisions were made, or needs to find buried decisions and untested assumptions in correspondence.
/plugin install risk-and-issues-manager-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 184scope-change-controller-scott-margettsScope management for legal matters — baseline capture, in-flight change control, OOS documentation, and scope retrospective. Use when asked to review scoping assumptions, assess whether work is in or out of scope, draft a scope change notice, track scope changes, prepare an OOS justification, run an OOS report, prepare a scope call agenda, or review what changed on a matter.
/plugin install scope-change-controller-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 185stakeholder-comms-planner-scott-margettsStakeholder mapping, communication plan design, reporting hierarchy, and mid-matter comms updates. Use when setting up a new matter and needing to identify who needs what information, designing the communication rhythm, building reporting structures for multi-jurisdiction programmes, or updating the comms plan when the stakeholder landscape changes.
/plugin install stakeholder-comms-planner-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 186status-report-drafter-scott-margettsDraft matter status reports from emails, call notes, and updates. Internal and client-facing formats, RAG logic, variance commentary, escalation flags. Use when asked to draft a status report, write a project update, summarise matter progress, prepare a client report, create a weekly or monthly update, convert emails into a status summary, or produce any kind of matter reporting. Also triggers when the user pastes email threads and asks what the status is, or needs to turn internal updates into client-facing reports.
/plugin install status-report-drafter-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 187timeline-generator-scott-margettsBuild dependency network and critical path from a matter plan. Produce an interactive Gantt, flag near-critical tasks, and run what-if cascade scenarios when delays occur — showing programme impact and drafting communications. Produces filtered workstream or jurisdiction views for local counsel.
/plugin install timeline-generator-scott-margetts@lawve-ai - 188archeologue-gallica-allison-fiorentinoRecherche dans les fonds juridiques anciens numérisés par la BNF (API Gallica, sans clé) : débats parlementaires du JO depuis 1871, doctrine d'origine (Sirey, Dalloz, thèses du XIXe), jurisprudence ancienne (Bulletins civil et criminel, Lebon, Gazette des tribunaux), JO Lois et décrets 1881-2015. Chaque résultat est localisé à la page avec extrait océrisé et lien pérenne vers le fac-similé. Utilisez cette skill dès que l'utilisateur cherche l'origine historique d'un texte, d'un concept ou d'une jurisprudence, ou toute source antérieure aux bases modernes.
/plugin install archeologue-gallica-allison-fiorentino@lawve-ai - 189assistant-juridique-christophe-quezel-ambrunazAssistant juridique expert couvrant le droit français, européen (UE et CEDH) et étranger via LegalDataHunter, pour professionnels et chercheurs. Couvre dix tâches : cadrage, recherche juridique, consultation, rédaction d'actes, analyse de pièces, contre-argumentaire, analyse de contrats, veille juridique, vérification de références et harmonisation bibliographique. Règle stricte d'anti-hallucination (Chercher → Trouver → Citer) avec vérification temporelle de chaque texte normatif via OpenLegi. Utilisez cette skill chaque fois que l'utilisateur mentionne du droit français ou européen, demande une recherche juridique, une consultation, la rédaction d'un acte, l'analyse d'un contrat ou d'une pièce, une vérification de citation OpenLegi/HAL/CEDH, ou prépare un dossier de plaidoirie — même sans dire explicitement « assistant juridique ».
/plugin install assistant-juridique-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz@lawve-ai - 190employment-law-research-yue-deng-wuThis Skill creates a research brief for an area of US employment law. The brief can address a specific question or be a multi-state survey. It'll include citations to primary sources (e.g. statutes, rule, government guidance), and reputable secondary sources like client alerts and multi-state surveys from top law firms and articles from legal publications (e.g. National Law Review).
/plugin install employment-law-research-yue-deng-wu@lawve-ai - 191eu-legislation-malik-taiarAccess EU law. Search and retrieve Directives, Regulations, Treaties and CJEU case law from EUR-Lex.
/plugin install eu-legislation-malik-taiar@lawve-ai - 192gibraltar-regulatory-compliance-osint-philip-vasquezA jurisdiction-grounding reference file for AI assistants working on Gibraltar legal, regulatory, and compliance research. Corrects systematic errors AI models make when applying English law to Gibraltar — a distinct jurisdiction under the Gibraltar Constitution Order 2006, with its own court hierarchy, civil procedure rules, employment law, and regulatory framework. Covers the source hierarchy, court structure, civil procedure divergences (14-day deemed service, post-Jackson reforms not adopted), employment law specifics (uncapped discrimination awards, 5-employee redundancy threshold), FSC financial services regulation, AML/KYC compliance sources, Gibraltar Companies Act 2014 with UBO public register, and a structured directory of official public record sources. Includes research profiles for lawyers, compliance professionals, and due diligence practitioners. Not legal advice.
/plugin install gibraltar-regulatory-compliance-osint-philip-vasquez@lawve-ai - 193giurisprudenza-lampo-giovanna-panucciRicerca rapida della giurisprudenza italiana, finalizzata a fornire un primo quadro orientativo su una determinata questione giuridica. Consulta le pronunce della Corte di cassazione, dei TAR e del Consiglio di Stato, nonché le banche dati giuridiche italiane (DeJure, Italgiure), per individuare le decisioni pertinenti; sintetizza l’orientamento giurisprudenziale prevalente, segnala eventuali pronunce contrastanti ed evidenzia le implicazioni operative ai fini della formulazione di pareri o della definizione della strategia. Il risultato è una nota strutturata di primo orientamento, non un’analisi esaustiva.
/plugin install giurisprudenza-lampo-giovanna-panucci@lawve-ai - 194icelandic-court-case-finder-magnus-smarasonUse this skill when asked to find, cite, analyze, or summarize Icelandic court decisions. Triggers on requests involving Hæstiréttur (Supreme Court), Landsréttur (Court of Appeal), Félagsdómur (Labour Court), héraðsdómur (District Court) case law, or Icelandic legal precedent research.
/plugin install icelandic-court-case-finder-magnus-smarason@lawve-ai - 195icelandic-legal-terminology-magnus-smarasonUse this skill when asked to translate, explain, or map Icelandic legal terms to English (or vice versa). Triggers on requests involving Icelandic legal vocabulary, legal translation, understanding Icelandic statutes or court decisions, or cross-referencing Icelandic and common law concepts.
/plugin install icelandic-legal-terminology-magnus-smarason@lawve-ai - 196investigacion-juridica-matias-gv-rojas-faundezAsistente jurídico experto en derecho chileno. Úsalo cuando el usuario haga consultas sobre normativa, códigos, procedimientos o jurisprudencia de Chile y necesite respuestas fundamentadas con cita de ley y artículo y una fuente verificable (BCN). No usar para derecho de otros países ni como reemplazo de asesoría legal formal. Funciona SIN base de datos externa: responde con el conocimiento del modelo, por lo que debe marcar toda incertidumbre y remitir a la fuente oficial para verificación.
/plugin install investigacion-juridica-matias-gv-rojas-faundez@lawve-ai - 197legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossianRoutes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, the Atticus Project's CUAD/MAUD/ACORD) plus translation evidence (WMT25, SwiLTra-Bench, ArabLegalEval). Covers five verticals: contract drafting, info extraction, legal research, contract review, and legal translation (including Arabic/MENA). Each asks up to four questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then returns a primary model, a fallback, what to avoid, and what a human must verify. Core principle: capability is not controllability, so every route ends with a verification step. Not legal advice; a lawyer owns the output.
/plugin install legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian@lawve-ai - 198legal-analysis-forge-oliver-schmidt-prietzEU Digital Regulation Legal Analysis Forge — generates a tailored expert prompt for structured legal analysis of an EU digital-regulation document, optionally executes it in-session, and always produces a plain-English explainer alongside the formal output. Handles Regulations, Directives, Commission Guidelines, EDPB Opinions, CJEU and AG judgments, national DPA decisions, codes of conduct, and draft consultations across the EU digital stack.
/plugin install legal-analysis-forge-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 199mandatory-verification-larissa-meredith-flisterMandatory external verification workflow for ALL non-trivial factual claims before presenting them as true. This skill MUST be used whenever Claude is asked to research any topic, answer factual questions, provide current information, draft documents containing factual claims, give legal advice or cite legal authority, discuss current events or public figures, provide technical or scientific information, state statistics or data points, or answer ANY question where the answer could have changed over time. Also trigger when the user asks Claude to 'check', 'verify', 'confirm', 'research', 'look up', or 'find out' anything, or when the user needs information that requires freshness, precision, or source accuracy. This skill overrides any default tendency to answer from memory. If a task involves stating facts, citing sources, or providing current information — use this skill.
/plugin install mandatory-verification-larissa-meredith-flister@lawve-ai - 200multi-jurisdictional-research-zacharie-laikMulti-jurisdictional legal research and risk assessment using the Legal Data Hunter MCP (40+ countries, 13M+ documents). Use when the user asks about law across multiple countries, comparative law, cross-border regulatory analysis, or case law/legislation in any European or other covered jurisdiction. Triggers on jurisdictional comparison, cross-border risk, multi-country compliance, GDPR enforcement across member states, or Legal Data Hunter references. Also handles single non-French jurisdiction research. For French-only law, prefer goodlegal-research.
/plugin install multi-jurisdictional-research-zacharie-laik@lawve-ai - 201proposition-audit-anthony-searlePost-hoc verification and trust audit of AI-generated factual and interpretive claims. Classifies claims by type and salience, routes them to domain-appropriate sources, scores trustworthiness on a tiered scale with an Interpolated verdict for plausible-but-unsupported detail, and assesses rhetorical fairness on interpretive claims. Designed with a focus on healthcare law in England and Wales, but with general applicability beyond.
/plugin install proposition-audit-anthony-searle@lawve-ai - 202raisonnement-juridique-amaury-fouretModélise le raisonnement juridique d'un magistrat français pour l'analyse de dossiers civils. Utiliser ce skill pour analyser un litige et identifier les questions juridiques, construire un raisonnement juridique structuré (syllogisme), rédiger une motivation de jugement civil, rechercher la jurisprudence et les textes applicables via Judilibre et Légifrance, qualifier juridiquement des faits et actes, distinguer prétentions, moyens et arguments. Basé sur les Fiches méthodologiques de rédaction du jugement civil (ENM/Cour de cassation, 2023).
/plugin install raisonnement-juridique-amaury-fouret@lawve-ai - 203recherche-doctrine-allison-fiorentinoRecherche académique dans les bases de données de doctrine juridique française, européenne et internationale. Utiliser cette skill lorsque l'utilisateur demande de rechercher des articles de doctrine, des thèses, des ouvrages académiques, ou des travaux universitaires en droit — y compris en droit comparé. Sources principales : ISIDORE (agrégateur SHS du CNRS incluant Cairn.info, Persée, OpenEdition), HAL (archive ouverte française), OpenAlex (base ouverte mondiale 250M+ travaux), Semantic Scholar, CrossRef, Persée (OAI direct), et CORE. Couvre la doctrine juridique francophone ET internationale avec workflow bilingue intégré pour le droit comparé. Déclencher aussi pour : bibliographie commentée, état de l'art, revue de littérature juridique, recherche d'auteur, vérification de citation, analyse bibliométrique.
/plugin install recherche-doctrine-allison-fiorentino@lawve-ai - 204recherche-jurisprudence-allison-fiorentinoCe skill donne accès à l'API de judilibre. Vous formulez votre demande en français, il interroge la base Judlibre et renvoie les réponses. Attention le skill ne fonctionne que si des domaines supplémentaires sont utilisés et que l'utilisateur a rentré sa propre clé Judlibre. Ce skill et son auteur n'ont aucun lien avec la Cour de cassation ou Judilibre.
/plugin install recherche-jurisprudence-allison-fiorentino@lawve-ai - 205recherche-jurisprudence-librejusticeGratuit et open source, cette compétence fait chercher, vérifier et citer la jurisprudence française et européenne à votre assistant, sur les ~3,8 millions de décisions de LibreJustice. Sa règle première : aucune décision n'entre dans la réponse sans avoir été lue en texte intégral, jamais sur la foi d'un résumé. Les citations sont verbatim et tracées à leur source, chaque décision nommée est un lien, et le sort de la décision sur recours est affiché avant qu'elle soit invoquée comme autorité. Cour de cassation, Conseil d'État, cours d'appel, tribunaux judiciaires et administratifs, Conseil constitutionnel, CNIL, CEDH, CJUE et CNDA (seulement les décisions publiques). Le connecteur LibreJustice est nécessaire ; la compétence guide son installation.
/plugin install recherche-jurisprudence-librejustice@lawve-ai - 206recherche-normes-librejusticeGratuit et open source, cette compétence trouve et cite le texte applicable à la date qui compte, sur les ~3,7 millions d'articles de LibreJustice. La date d'abord, le texte ensuite : la version en vigueur aujourd'hui est la mauvaise pour la plupart des contentieux, donc elle identifie la date pertinente, sert la version valide à cette date et dit laquelle elle cite. Aucune disposition n'est citée de mémoire, chaque article est lié à sa page. Codes et lois français, droit de l'Union, traités et accords bilatéraux, codes de 59 pays étrangers, conventions collectives, BOFiP, circulaires. Le connecteur LibreJustice est nécessaire ; la compétence guide son installation.
/plugin install recherche-normes-librejustice@lawve-ai - 207recherche-theses-allison-fiorentinoRecherche, cartographie et analyse des thèses de doctorat françaises via theses.fr (API ABES) et TEL (HAL). Spécialisée droit avec filtrage par sous-disciplines juridiques. Ouverte sur d'autres domaines universitaires. Capacités : (1) recherche multi-critères — sujet, directeur, jury, établissement, école doctorale, période, statut soutenue/en préparation, discipline ; (2) cartographie académique — qui dirige sur quel sujet, qui siège dans quels jurys, réseaux de co-direction, écoles doctorales productives ; (3) analyses temporelles — évolution d'un sujet, détection de saturation, calendrier des soutenances à venir ; (4) filtrage sous-discipline juridique — droit privé, public, social, affaires, international, etc. Déclencher dès que l'utilisateur mentionne thèse, doctorat, directeur de thèse, jury de thèse, école doctorale, soutenance, doctorant, ou demande une analyse d'écosystème doctoral. Pour articles ou ouvrages de doctrine, utiliser plutôt recherche-doctrine.
/plugin install recherche-theses-allison-fiorentino@lawve-ai - 208red-team-verifier-patrick-munroAdversarial verification for AI-generated legal content with systematic fact-checking, source validation, and quality control. Use when verifying legal documents, fact-checking regulatory content, performing red team review, or quality assurance before distribution to clients or stakeholders.
/plugin install red-team-verifier-patrick-munro@lawve-ai - 209ricerca-giuridica-it-silvio-mistrettaSkill for legal research on Italian and EU sources: legislation, administrative practice, and case law. Encode a working method, not an opinion: routing to official sources, citations with verifiable references, validity checks including ratione temporis, query minimization for contexts covered by professional secrecy, and concise output by default. The Agent Skills format is an open standard: the skill was created for Claude (claude.ai, Desktop, Cowork, Claude Code) and is reusable in tools that adopt the same format.
/plugin install ricerca-giuridica-it-silvio-mistretta@lawve-ai - 210statute-analyzer-rafal-frycGuide for reading, interpreting, and applying statutes, regulations, and rules in legal and compliance contexts. Use when the user asks about (1) how to read and interpret statutes, regulations, or rules, (2) statutory interpretation methods and canons of construction, (3) understanding legislative intent, (4) applying statutes to specific legal situations, (5) extracting requirements from legal text, (6) distinguishing between different types of legal requirements, or (7) cross-jurisdictional compliance analysis.
/plugin install statute-analyzer-rafal-fryc@lawve-ai - 211swiss-legal-source-and-authority-triage-enrique-g-zbindenSwiss legal source and authority triage. Use when a user asks a Swiss legal, regulatory, compliance, contract, employment, corporate, litigation, IP, tax, privacy, public-law, fintech, register, or cantonal-law question; when Swiss law may apply; or when an AI legal answer needs source routing across federal, cantonal, communal, regulator, register, contractual, professional, soft-law, multilingual, or open-data layers.
/plugin install swiss-legal-source-and-authority-triage-enrique-g-zbinden@lawve-ai - 212uk-citation-verification-matei-clejVerifies UK case-law citations, pinpoint references and quotations against the official public register — The National Archives' Find Case Law — and statutory references against legislation.gov.uk, before a document that cites them is relied on, served or filed. Every check returns a graded verdict: VERIFIED, MISMATCH (the citation resolves to a different case — the classic AI miscitation), NOT ON REGISTER, OUTSIDE COVERAGE (the register cannot answer — absence proves nothing), or UNCHECKABLE (a law-report citation). The grading exists because there are two ways to get this wrong: citing a case that does not exist, and accusing a real case of not existing. Use when asked to check citations, verify a case exists, confirm a quotation is verbatim, check a pinpoint paragraph, audit a draft's authorities, screen a document for hallucinated cases, or check a statutory provision is in force. Not a substitute for reading the judgment: existence is not authority.
/plugin install uk-citation-verification-matei-clej@lawve-ai - 213verifica-fonti-michele-loiChecks the formal coherence and plausibility of Italian and EU legal citations (statutes, case law) in text produced by Claude or other legal-AI skills. Reports clause-by-clause on what is well-formed, suspicious, or unresolvable against real norms, covering Cassazione, Corte Costituzionale, Consiglio di Stato, TAR, Normattiva, EUR-Lex, Garante Privacy, AGCM, ANAC. Minimal-surface variant: no proprietary backend fetch, allowlist limited to official Italian and EU institutional registries.
/plugin install verifica-fonti-michele-loi@lawve-ai - 214ambiguity-stress-test-seth-chandlerAdversarially stress-tests a legal text — a contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — for interpretive ambiguity: it finds the seams where the people governed by it will later disagree about what it means and turns each into a concrete dispute scenario with both sides' arguments, the likely outcome, and a fix. Use it whenever someone wants to pressure-test, red-team, audit, or find weak spots, loopholes, gaps, ambiguities, or drafting problems in a legal document; whenever a drafter wants to tighten a contract, statute, regulation, or opinion before it issues; whenever a litigator wants to mine an opinion or contract for arguments; or whenever someone hands over a legal text and asks where it will be fought over or for issue-spotting. Trigger it for contract review, statutory-ambiguity analysis, judicial-opinion scope analysis, and drafting QA — even if the user never says "stress-test" or "ambiguity."
/plugin install ambiguity-stress-test-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 215assignation-refere-recouvrement-creance-selim-brihiRédaction d'assignations en référé devant le tribunal de commerce ou des activités économiques pour le recouvrement de créances commerciales. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger, préparer ou créer une assignation en référé pour obtenir le paiement d'une créance impayée (factures, prestations de services, ventes de marchandises, etc.) lorsque le débiteur n'a pas honoré ses obligations de paiement et qu'il n'existe pas de contestation sérieuse.
/plugin install assignation-refere-recouvrement-creance-selim-brihi@lawve-ai - 216chronology-builder-andrew-birdBuilds a litigation chronology from the disclosure bundle itself — every entry attributed to its source document, behind a CPR 31.22 implied-undertaking check, because documents disclosed in English proceedings may only be used for those proceedings. Adds a privilege screen and case-theory significance tagging, so the output is court-facing work product, not a loose timeline. Use when the user asks to build a chronology or timeline from a disclosure bundle, a matter file, or witness statements, or says 'build the chron', 'what happened when', or needs a Statement of Facts ready timeline.
/plugin install chronology-builder-andrew-bird@lawve-ai - 217client-instruction-schedule-serhan-handani-fx44146uBuild a client instruction schedule: a plain-English, Scott Schedule-style Word table that gathers a struggling client's evidence and instructions issue by issue, with a one-page covering note. Output is always a .docx draft for solicitor review.
/plugin install client-instruction-schedule-serhan-handani-fx44146u@lawve-ai - 218cpr-letter-drafter-andrew-birdWrites the formal letter you send before suing someone in a civil case in England & Wales — the Letter Before Claim that starts the pre-action clock. The part it gets right is which pre-action protocol applies — debt, professional negligence, housing disrepair, personal injury, or the default Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct — each of which has its own rules a generic letter misses (the 30-day debt window, the professional-negligence preliminary-notice step). It also flags the limitation deadline for a solicitor to confirm rather than stating it as fact. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small firms without a precedent to copy. Use when the user says 'draft an LBC', 'letter before claim', 'pre-action letter', 'pre-action protocol', or needs to start the pre-action clock before issuing a civil claim. Verify the current protocol before sending.
/plugin install cpr-letter-drafter-andrew-bird@lawve-ai - 219disclosure-list-andrew-birdWorks out which documents you have to hand over to the other side in a civil case in England & Wales, and builds the formal list. The part it gets right that trips people up is which disclosure regime applies — Practice Direction 57AD (the Disclosure Pilot, now permanent in the Business and Property Courts, with its Models A–E) or standard disclosure under CPR Part 31 everywhere else. It picks the regime, chooses a Model per issue, structures the Disclosure Review Document, and drafts the disclosure certificate for the party to sign personally. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small teams without a precedent bank. Use when the user says 'disclosure list', 'PD 57AD', 'Model C', 'extended disclosure', 'List of Documents', 'N265', or needs to work out what must be disclosed.
/plugin install disclosure-list-andrew-bird@lawve-ai - 220disclosure-strategy-mapper-larissa-meredith-flisterThis skill maps disclosure strategy from a case summary, pleading, chronology, or early case theory: the document categories that will matter, likely custodians, adverse material, evidential gaps, search themes, and the risks worth confronting early.
/plugin install disclosure-strategy-mapper-larissa-meredith-flister@lawve-ai - 221isds-arbitrators-cameron-russellArbitrator research tool for investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), built for arbitration counsel. It produces reliable, structured, and thorough insights into arbitrators' experience, and can identify, evaluate, and rank the suitability of arbitrators for specific disputes. The tool flags arbitrator decisions and publications that bear on the issues in the dispute, checks an arbitrator's caseload, and suggests additional issues for counsel's consideration prior to nomination. Try asking about specific arbitrators, or describe your dispute and ask for a shortlist of suitable arbitrator candidates. Outputs are grounded in the UNCTAD ISDS Navigator dataset, targeted live lookups (ICSID), and additional verification from primary sources. For best functionality, also download the isds-research skill.
/plugin install isds-arbitrators-cameron-russell@lawve-ai - 222isds-research-cameron-russellCompliant, retrieval-grounded research over investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) awards and decisions. Use when the user asks about ICSID / investment-treaty arbitration cases, awards, or doctrines (fair and equitable treatment, expropriation, jurisdiction, costs, annulment, etc.) and wants answers grounded in the actual document text with pinpoint citations. Identifies the correct document on the case page, confirms it against the PDF's own first pages, retrieves primary documents on demand from ICSID, PCA, etc., never scrapes or hosts a corpus in violation of applicable terms, and cites only retrieved text.
/plugin install isds-research-cameron-russell@lawve-ai - 223judicial-first-impression-larissa-meredith-flisterAssesses a legal argument, submission, or piece of structured reasoning from the perspective of a judge reading it cold under time pressure. Produces a structured seven-part assessment: what the case appears to be about, immediate points of confusion, what feels strong, what feels weak, what is assumed but unproved, a provisional confidence level (low/medium/high), and what would be needed to persuade. The skill does not rewrite, improve, or attack the argument — it tells you how it actually lands on a sceptical, experienced reader with no prior context. Works on skeleton arguments, witness statements, letters before action, position statements, academic articles, and non-legal structured reasoning.
/plugin install judicial-first-impression-larissa-meredith-flister@lawve-ai - 224litigacion-latam-joselyne-garcia-montesdeocaAsesor experto en litigación civil latinoamericana bajo sistemas de derecho civil. Está diseñado para asistir a abogados litigantes, equipos legales internos y clientes directos con estrategia procesal, análisis de riesgos y orientación sobre el proceso civil en América Latina. Al final de cada sesión redacta un correo electrónico claro que resume los hallazgos para el cliente. Cinco modos de operación: 1) Estrategia: cómo enfocar el litigio, qué vía procesal elegir, cómo construir la posición del cliente. 2) Riesgo: evaluar viabilidad, probabilidades de éxito, prescripción, caducidad. 3) Proceso: etapas del proceso, plazos, recursos disponibles, pasos inmediatos. 4) Asesoría cliente: explicaciones claras para clientes. 5) Email al cliente: borrador automático de email al final de cualquier análisis.
/plugin install litigacion-latam-joselyne-garcia-montesdeoca@lawve-ai - 225litigation-deadline-calendar-dave-marcusA plugin for calendaring litigation and arbitration deadlines from scheduling orders. Scans scheduling orders and outputs in a calendar file for Outlook or Google Calendar. Also permits inviting other team members via calendar invites.
/plugin install litigation-deadline-calendar-dave-marcus@lawve-ai - 226mediation-dispute-analysis-jinzhe-tanAnalyzes legal disputes for mediation purposes — reviewing case materials (pleadings, contracts, correspondence, evidence), identifying contested issues, summarizing each party's position and interests, performing legal analysis of key issues, proposing mediation strategies or settlement directions, and preparing for mediation sessions. Use this skill whenever the user mentions mediation, dispute analysis, settlement, ADR, dispute resolution, party positions, caucus strategy, or asks to analyze a conflict between two or more parties with a resolution-oriented (rather than litigation-oriented) goal — including when they upload case files and ask for a structured breakdown of who wants what or how the case might settle, even when they don't explicitly say "mediation".
/plugin install mediation-dispute-analysis-jinzhe-tan@lawve-ai - 227opposing-counsel-review-larissa-meredith-flisterAct as experienced opposing counsel to attack, undermine, and expose weaknesses in a legal argument, submission, witness statement, or structured reasoning. Produces a six-part adversarial analysis: 1. A core theory of attack identifying the single most effective way to defeat the argument; 2. A reconstructed version of the opposing argument stripped of rhetoric to expose its fragility; 3. Primary lines of attack grouped by category (legal misstatement, evidential gaps, causation failures, internal inconsistency, over-reliance on assertion, procedural weakness); 4. An "if I were the judge" section showing how a sceptical tribunal would dismantle the argument; 5. Surgical strikes - 3 to 5 high-impact points ready for oral submissions; and 6. An analysis of what the argument is trying to hide. Written in formal, adversarial British English for a legally trained audience.
/plugin install opposing-counsel-review-larissa-meredith-flister@lawve-ai - 228pleading-injection-guard-matei-clejDetects prompt injection hidden in documents from the other side (pleadings, skeletons, bundles, served evidence, opponents' emails and attachments) before an AI reads them, so the model is not turned against your client. Checks word by word that the text an extractor hands the model was visibly drawn on the page: white, near-white, covered, clipped, off-page, tiny, transparent and invisible-mode text in PDF (ink test plus OCR); Word formatting resolved as Word does (styles, shading, theme colours, scaling, off-page frames, fallbacks, unused headers); HTML/CSS, RTF, email with attachments and zips, xlsx/pptx and legacy formats. Flags Unicode smuggling, text addressed to an AI and authorities found only in hidden text. Fails closed. Optional Read-tool hook. Use BEFORE any AI summary or analysis of an opposing or third-party document. Triggers: 'scan for injection', 'is this document safe', 'check the other side's skeleton', 'injection guard'.
/plugin install pleading-injection-guard-matei-clej@lawve-ai - 229pre-motion-andrew-birdAdversarial premortem for England & Wales civil litigation - builds the strongest version of a case, then attacks it from four angles to find where it loses before opposing counsel does. Runs an adversarial premortem on a UK litigation matter. Builds the strongest version of the case, then attacks it from four angles — procedural, substantive, evidentiary, strategic — to find where it actually loses. Returns a ranked stress-test brief: failure scenarios, evidence inconsistencies, blind spots, mitigations, and one brutal one-sentence verdict. Use before issue, before settlement negotiations, before a litigation-funder pitch, or before deciding whether to take a case.
/plugin install pre-motion-andrew-bird@lawve-ai - 230requete-cph-licenciement-faute-grave-selim-brihiRédaction de requêtes devant le Conseil de prud'hommes pour contester un licenciement pour faute grave. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger une requête CPH, contester un licenciement pour faute grave, préparer une saisine du CPH pour un litige lié à un licenciement, ou créer un document de contestation de licenciement en droit du travail français.
/plugin install requete-cph-licenciement-faute-grave-selim-brihi@lawve-ai - 231settlement-pressure-tester-larissa-meredith-flisterThis skill stress-tests a proposed settlement position before an offer goes out or comes back: the assumptions it depends on, your leverage and the opponent’s, the evidential weaknesses, the likely opponent response, and the timing and costs pressures around it. It structures settlement judgment for a better-informed decision; it does not advise whether to settle.
/plugin install settlement-pressure-tester-larissa-meredith-flister@lawve-ai - 232sustainable-opposing-counsel-review-seth-chandlerProduces an adversarial attack on a legal argument that survives reply. Runs the opposing-counsel discipline twice: an unrestrained first pass, then the same instrument turned on that pass to cut every point that collapses under challenge - attacks on facts your own side has conceded, objections belonging to the wrong forum, speculation about documents and motives, gotchas with innocent explanations, overclaims, self-refuting assertions, and padding. The deliverable is one standalone attack containing only what can be defended, capped at five heads, not a discussion of the discarded draft. Use to attack, stress-test, red-team or rebut a submission, brief, motion, witness statement, letter or piece of structured legal reasoning when the output must be something you could stand up and say. Also use when an earlier adversarial review came back overlong, scattershot or padded with points you do not trust. Derived from Opposing Counsel Review by Larissa Meredith-Flister (Apache-2.0). Formal British English.
/plugin install sustainable-opposing-counsel-review-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 233without-prejudice-drafter-andrew-birdWrites a settlement letter on the right footing — and warns you when marking it 'without prejudice' won't actually keep it out of court. A genuine settlement letter is normally protected (the judge can't see it), but only if the substance is a real attempt to settle, and even then there are exceptions. The skill picks the correct footing — without prejudice (WP), without prejudice save as to costs (WPSATC / Calderbank), or open — drafts the finished letter, and surfaces the Unilever v Procter & Gamble exceptions that get WP material admitted despite the label, which a plain template won't flag. Built for juniors and in-house counsel drafting a settlement or Calderbank offer who need the footing right the first time. Use when the user asks to draft a WP letter, a Calderbank, a settlement letter, or wants to know whether material is likely protected from disclosure.
/plugin install without-prejudice-drafter-andrew-bird@lawve-ai - 234nil-contract-reviewer-samir-patelNIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) contract analysis for NCAA student-athletes from the athlete's perspective. Use when user says 'review this NIL contract', 'analyze this NIL deal', 'check this athlete agreement', 'review my NIL agreement', or uploads a PDF NIL contract for review. Identifies red flags, missing protections, and compliance issues. Produces a structured review memorandum with negotiation positions. Do NOT use for general contract review, employment agreements, non-NIL endorsements, or brand-side deal analysis.
/plugin install nil-contract-reviewer-samir-patel@lawve-ai - 235excel-editor-openaiToolkit for comprehensive Spreadsheet reading, creation, editing, and analysis with visual quality control. Use to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing tabular data, (3) Modifying existing spreadsheets while preserving formulas, (4) Building financial models with proper formatting, (5) Data visualization with in-sheet charts, or any other spreadsheet tasks.
/plugin install excel-editor-openai@lawve-ai - 236normalisation-juridique-christophe-quezel-ambrunazLa compétence Normalisation juridique FR nettoie un document Word rédigé en français juridique. Elle distingue deux régimes : les corrections déterministes (apostrophes courbes, guillemets français, espaces insécables, insécables des références — art. 1240, n° 21-12.345, 50 % —, ordinaux 1ère → 1re, ligatures œ, la loi dispose et non stipule, anglicismes-calques), appliquées directement ; et les réécritures de jugement (virgule avant « et », ternaires creux, formules emphatiques, harmonisations), posées en révisions Word soumises à votre acceptation. Chaque changement est consigné et restitué en tableau récapitulatif : on revient en arrière mot à mot — « défais 3, 7-10 ». La normalisation des citations reste purement formelle. Fonctionne en Cowork ou sur fichier Word.
/plugin install normalisation-juridique-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz@lawve-ai - 237outlook-malik-taiarRead, search, and download emails and attachments from Microsoft Outlook via OAuth2. Use when the user asks to check, read, or fetch emails, search by keyword or sender, download attachments, or chain email content into other skills.
/plugin install outlook-malik-taiar@lawve-ai - 238word-editor-antoine-louisEdit, query, and transform Word documents (.docx) with the SuperDoc CLI. Use when the user asks to read, search, modify, format, comment, track changes, or review changes in .docx files. Triggers on any task involving Word documents — text replacement, redlining, contract markup, template filling, bulk edits, content extraction, or document review.
/plugin install word-editor-antoine-louis@lawve-ai - 239word-editor-openaiToolkit for comprehensive document reading and creation with visual quality control. Use to work with Word documents (.docx files) for: (1) Reading or extracting content from existing DOCX files, (2) Creating new Word documents with professional formatting, (3) Editing documents requiring precise typography and layout, or any other DOCX reading or generation tasks.
/plugin install word-editor-openai@lawve-ai - 240word-editor-superdocSearches, replaces, and reads text in Word documents from the command line. Use when the user asks to edit, search, or extract text from .docx files.
/plugin install word-editor-superdoc@lawve-ai - 241fedramp-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP Certification Classes (A, B, C, D — new baseline labels: A = pilot/transitional, B = LI-SaaS/Low, C = Moderate, D = High, per NTC-0004), FedRAMP 20x (now the primary authorization pathway), OSCAL mandate (September 2026), 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. FedRAMP Ready retires July 28, 2026. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring.
/plugin install fedramp-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 242ism-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert Australian Information Security Manual (ISM) advisor for government entities and their supply chains. Use for ISM control selection, gap analysis, system authorisation, IRAP assessment preparation, security documentation, and ASD compliance. Triggers on: ISM controls, ASD compliance, IRAP assessment, PROTECTED system scoping, Essential Eight vs ISM, system authorisation, NC/OS/ PROTECTED/SECRET/TOP SECRET classification markings, security objectives, ISM guidelines or chapters, control applicability markings, cybersecurity documentation for Australian government, and any question about the ASD Information Security Manual framework or Australian government cybersecurity obligations.
/plugin install ism-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 243nist-800-53-tanaji-hemant-naikNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailoring and overlays, privacy controls (PT family), supply chain risk management (SR family), assessment procedures (SP 800-53A), OSCAL, RMF integration (SP 800-37), and mapping to FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC 2.0, and ISO 27001. Use for any federal system security controls, FISMA compliance, RMF step guidance, control narrative writing, or baseline tailoring question.
/plugin install nist-800-53-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 244nzism-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) advisor for NZ government agencies and their supply chains. Use for NZISM control guidance, gap analysis, agency security obligations, classification framework (Unclassified through Top Secret), security risk management, system certification, and GCSB/NCSC NZ compliance. Triggers on: NZISM controls, NZ government security, GCSB compliance, agency cybersecurity obligations, NZ classification markings, Restricted/Confidential/Secret system scoping, agency security policies, third-party supplier security, Certification and Accreditation (C&A), and any question about NZ government information security requirements or the NZISM framework.
/plugin install nzism-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 245section-508-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert Section 508 compliance advisor for US federal ICT accessibility. Use this skill whenever a user asks about Section 508, WCAG 2.0/2.1 AA for federal systems, VPAT or Accessibility Conformance Reports (ACR), accessibility audits, remediation planning, PDF accessibility, web or software accessibility, mobile accessibility, federal procurement accessibility requirements, contractor obligations, undue burden exceptions, assistive technology compatibility, or Section 508 testing. Covers the Revised Section 508 Standards (2018), all WCAG 2.0 Level AA success criteria, the four POUR principles, testing methodologies, and agency compliance workflows.
/plugin install section-508-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 246law-expertise-to-skill-adrian-lererTurn a lawyer's bounded expertise, workflow, review standard, or legal judgment pattern into a safe, inspectable legal AI skill. Use when a user provides legal memos, comments, checklists, negotiation notes, review habits, compliance playbooks, or professional feedback and wants a reusable Lawve-style skill. Do not impersonate the lawyer or claim to reproduce a person; distill only authorized, source-bounded capability.
/plugin install law-expertise-to-skill-adrian-lerer@lawve-ai - 247lawve-prep-seth-chandlerTakes a skill — a .skill or .zip archive, a bare SKILL.md, a folder, or just a raw idea — and produces a package ready for public distribution on lawve.ai, plus the exact entries for the submission form. Runs a gate first: skills with no plausible legal use, unsafe code, or licensing bars are declined with reasons, and general-purpose skills that could serve legal work are offered a legal adaptation instead. Then applies the standard compliance transforms — structure, metadata, attribution, dependency ladders, orphaned-file repair, limitations disclosure — validates the result, and delivers a zip. Raw ideas are gated first, built (via skill-creator where available), then adapted. Use for "make this Lawve-compliant," "prep this skill for Lawve," "package for lawve.ai," "is this suitable for Lawve," "get my skill ready to publish," or any request to ready a skill for the Lawve catalogue.
/plugin install lawve-prep-seth-chandler@lawve-ai - 248skill-creation-openaiGuide for creating effective skills. Use when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends the model's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.
/plugin install skill-creation-openai@lawve-ai - 249skill-improvement-malik-taiarGuide to analyze a current work session and propose improvements to skills. Use (1) automatically after working with a skill to capture learnings, (2) when the user suggests improvements, corrections, or additions during a skill-related session, or (3) when the user manually invokes `self-improve`.
/plugin install skill-improvement-malik-taiar@lawve-ai - 250skill-injection-defense-adrian-lererAudits legal AI skills, prompts, workflows, MCP/tool instructions, and agent packages before they are trusted or installed. It detects prompt injection, hidden or hostile instructions, unsafe scripts, suspicious frontmatter, credential exposure, exfiltration paths, persistence mechanisms, cron/launchd hooks, unauthorized network calls, and supply-chain risk. Use it before adopting third-party or generated skills; before publishing a skill to a legal AI marketplace; when reviewing SKILL.md files, skill folders, scripts, references, MCP manifests, or automation instructions; or when a user asks whether an AI workflow is safe. Paste or upload the skill, prompt, MCP/tool instruction, etc you want to review. The auditor treats the material as untrusted data: it does not execute scripts, install packages, or obey commands embedded inside the reviewed content. It returns a verdict — approve, approve with constraints, rewrite, quarantine, or reject — plus the key risks and recommended remediation.
/plugin install skill-injection-defense-adrian-lerer@lawve-ai - 251skill-security-auditor-lawveAudit an AI agent skill before installing it. Use proactively whenever the user is about to add, install, enable, or evaluate an unfamiliar skill — including phrases like "audit this skill", "is this skill safe", "scan skill before install", "check skill for malicious code", "review this plugin", or any pre-install gate on an untrusted, third-party, or community-distributed skill bundle. Runs ten categories of static checks (code execution, network exfiltration, credential harvesting, persistence, prompt injection, supply-chain hooks, obfuscation, destructive filesystem ops, secrets, Trojan Source / homoglyphs) and emits a PASS / WARN / FAIL verdict.
/plugin install skill-security-auditor-lawve@lawve-ai - 252az-eu-website-privacy-audit-mirza-chiragovAudits a website for compliance with Azerbaijan's Law on Personal Data No. 998-IIIQ and, where applicable, EU GDPR plus ePrivacy/cookie consent rules. Inventories the privacy documents present (privacy policy, cookie policy, cookie banner, consent flow, controller and DPO contact, data subject rights channel, cross-border transfer disclosures, AZ operator-registration references) and scores each against the applicable statutory requirements. Produces a dual-layer report: a plain-language traffic-light summary for business owners plus a clause-by-clause findings table with article-level citations for lawyers. Assessment-only, no drafting. Use whenever the user shares a URL or privacy/cookie policy text for an AZ-based or AZ-targeted site; also when the user mentions an .az domain, Law 998, the AZ State Register, ePrivacy, an Art. 27 EU representative, or asks "is my site GDPR compliant", "do I need to register as an operator in Azerbaijan", or "is our cookie banner lawful" even without the word "audit".
/plugin install az-eu-website-privacy-audit-mirza-chiragov@lawve-ai - 253cis-controls-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert CIS Controls v8 (CIS Top 18) advisor — implementation group scoping (IG1/IG2/IG3), control gap assessments, safeguard-level guidance, asset inventory, software inventory, data protection, secure configuration, account management, access control, continuous vulnerability management, audit log management, email and web browser protections, malware defenses, network infrastructure management, network monitoring and defense, application software security, incident response, penetration testing, and CIS Controls mapping to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and CMMC. Use for any question about CIS Controls, CIS Benchmarks, Implementation Groups, or prioritized cyber hygiene for any organization size.
/plugin install cis-controls-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 254eu-ai-act-tanaji-hemant-naikEU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus adopted June 29, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of July 2026. GPAI enforcement powers activate August 2, 2026.
/plugin install eu-ai-act-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 255eu-cra-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route selection, CE marking, SBOM requirements, vulnerability and incident reporting to ENISA/CSIRTs, support period obligations, and manufacturer/importer/distributor duties. Trigger for EU CRA, Cyber Resilience Act, PDE compliance, Annex I requirements, SBOM EU, CE marking cybersecurity, or connected product security EU.
/plugin install eu-cra-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 256eu-data-act-oliver-schmidt-prietzPractitioner skill for EU Regulation 2023/2854 (Data Act). Covers Chapters II-VII (IoT data access, mandatory B2B sharing, unfair contract terms, public-sector exceptional need, cloud switching, third-country governmental access) and Chapter VIII (interoperability and smart contracts, gate-only). Use when the user asks about Data Act rights or obligations, drafts a Data Act notice or letter, reviews a data-sharing or cloud-switching contract under the Data Act, runs a Data Act gap analysis, or asks how the Data Act interacts with GDPR, the DMA, the Trade Secrets Directive, or sectoral law. Triggers include "Data Act", "Datengesetz", "Regulation (EU) 2023/2854", "Art. 4(1) request", "Art. 5(1) third-party request", "trade-secret handbrake", "cloud switching obligations", "Chapter VI", "Ch V exceptional need", and references to specific Data Act articles or recitals.
/plugin install eu-data-act-oliver-schmidt-prietz@lawve-ai - 257iso42001-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI, Statement of Applicability for AI systems, AI policy, responsible AI, AI lifecycle management, AI incident management, AI transparency, AI bias, AI certification readiness, or any topic related to implementing or auditing an AI Management System.
/plugin install iso42001-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 258mcp-builder-anthropicGuide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).
/plugin install mcp-builder-anthropic@lawve-ai - 259nis2-tanaji-hemant-naikEU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) compliance advisor for essential and important entities: entity classification, Art. 21 risk management measures, Art. 23 incident reporting timelines (24h/72h/1 month), Art. 20 governance obligations, supply chain security (Art. 21(2)(d); coordinated risk assessments Art. 22), gap assessments, policy drafting, ISO 27001 alignment, and penalty exposure analysis. Also covers Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, the technical/methodological sub-requirements for Art. 21(2) and the significant-incident thresholds binding on DNS/cloud/data-centre/MSP/MSSP/trust-service and other digital entities. Use for NIS2 readiness, transposition questions, ENISA technical implementation guidance, significant-incident thresholds, supervisory differences between essential and important entities, and cross-border coordination.
/plugin install nis2-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 260nist-ai-rmf-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor covering all four functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST AI RMF, AI risk management, AI trustworthiness, GOVERN function, MAP function, MEASURE function, MANAGE function, AI RMF Playbook, AI risk profiles, responsible AI, AI bias management, AI transparency, AI explainability, AI reliability, AI safety, NIST AI 100-1, AI risk assessment, AI incident response, or alignment to EU AI Act, ISO 42001, or NIST CSF via AI RMF.
/plugin install nist-ai-rmf-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 261nist-csf-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) advisor covering CSF 2.0 and CSF 1.1. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST CSF, cybersecurity risk management, the six CSF functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), CSF profiles, implementation tiers, gap assessments, organizational profiles, community profiles, CSF core subcategories, informative references, or mapping to other frameworks (NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, COBIT).
/plugin install nist-csf-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 262tsa-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naikExpert TSA cybersecurity compliance advisor for critical infrastructure owners and operators. Use this skill whenever a user asks about TSA Security Directives for pipelines, freight railroads, passenger rail, public transit, or bus operators; the TSA Cyber Risk Management Program (CRMP); Cybersecurity Implementation Plan (CIP); Cybersecurity Operational Implementation Plan (COIP); Cybersecurity Assessment Plan (CAP); incident reporting to CISA; designation of a Cybersecurity Coordinator; Critical Cyber Systems (CCS); OT/IT network segmentation; the TSA November 2024 NPRM; or any directive in the SD Pipeline-2021 series, SD 1580-21-01 (freight rail), or SD 1582-21-01 (public transit/passenger rail).
/plugin install tsa-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik@lawve-ai - 263code-security-review-openaiPerform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Covers Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Go. Use when the user requests security best practices guidance, a security review or report, or secure-by-default coding help.
/plugin install code-security-review-openai@lawve-ai - 264vs-code-extension-antoine-louisBuild VS Code extensions from scratch or convert existing JS/React/Vue apps. Supports commands, webviews (React/Vue), custom editors, tree views, and AI agent integration via file-bridge IPC. Use when user wants to create a VS Code extension, convert a web app to an extension, add webviews or custom UIs to VS Code, implement tree views, build custom file editors, integrate with AI agents, or package/publish extensions (.vsix).
/plugin install vs-code-extension-antoine-louis@lawve-ai
Files
A curated collection of the finest open-source agent skills for legal work, bringing together contributions from practicing lawyers, in-house counsel, academics, and legal technologists. Built on portable, open standards rather than proprietary agent formats, it aims to make AI accessible and practical for legal professionals.
Important
What are Agent Skills? — Skills are organized collections of files that package composable procedural knowledge for AI agents. For legal professionals, this means encoding your expertise into reusable AI workflows: draft GDPR-compliant privacy policies, review NDAs using your firm's methodology, create due diligence checklists that match your standards, etc.
Table of Contents
- Adobe Acrobat
- Banking Finance
- Commercial Law
- Compliance
- Corporate Law
- Criminal Law
- Data Protection
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Health Law
- Human Rights
- Immigration Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Legal Drafting
- Legal Education
- Legal Operations
- Legal Research
- Litigation
- Media Entertainment Sports
- Microsoft Office
- Public Law
- Skill Authoring
- Technology Law
- Transport Maritime
- Vibe Coding
Adobe Acrobat
- 🇬🇧 pdf-editor-openai - Toolkit for comprehensive PDF reading and creation with visual quality control. Use to work with PDFs (.pdf files) for: (1) Reading or extracting content from existing PDFs, (2) Creating new PDF documents with professional formatting, (3...
Banking Finance
- 🇬🇧 agent-authority-charter-builder-arkadiy-miteiko - Creates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allowed to do, who delegated authority to it, what actions are permitted or prohib...
- 🇬🇧 dora-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classifica...
- 🇬🇧 due-diligence-gate-adrian-lerer - Use for due diligence, legal-financial risk review, investment or business transaction checklists, and preliminary screening where facts, documents, assumptions, legal uncertainty, debt/equity, assets/liabilities, contracts, tax, regulat...
- 🇬🇧 financial-comparison-glossary-adrian-lerer - Use when a calculator, financial model, investor memo, due diligence report, risk review, dashboard, or client-facing explanation needs clear distinctions between accounting and finance concepts such as cash flow vs profit, EBIT vs EBITD...
- 🇬🇧 pci-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert PCI DSS compliance advisor covering PCI DSS v4.0.1 (current) and v4.0. Use this skill whenever a user asks about PCI DSS, payment card security, cardholder data protection, CDE scoping, SAQ types (A, A-EP, B, B-IP, C, C-VT, P2PE,...
- 🇬🇧 runtime-admissibility-review-arkadiy-miteiko - Determines whether a specific AI-agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible for execution or institutional reliance under current authority, delegated scope, evidence, facts, policy, risk, escalation,...
- 🇬🇧 swift-csp-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) advisor covering the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF v2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about SWIFT CSP, CSCF controls, SWIFT security attestation, KYC-SA portal, SWIFT a...
Commercial Law
- 🇬🇧 arbitration-clause-design-and-review-hafez-virjee - Draft, review and stress-test arbitration clauses in commercial contracts, with guidance on seat, institution, rules, confidentiality, governing law and commercial fit. In more detail, this workflow helps users identify drafting issues,...
- 🇬🇧 climate-aligned-contracts-the-chancery-lane-project - Draft, adapt, and review contracts and clauses aligned with The Chancery Lane Project's methodology for reducing carbon emissions through legal agreements. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Draft new climate-aligned clauses (e.g., net zero c...
- 🇬🇧 contract-intelligence-workflow-reviewer-carl-ditzler - Contract intelligence and contract operations workflow skill for Claude and Codex. Guides the full contract lifecycle review process from intake and playbook normalization through clause review, deviation scoring, negotiation planning, a...
- 🇬🇧 contract-risk-analyzer-sneha-ganapavarapu - Analyses contracts for risk across five critical clauses (Limitation of Liability, Indemnities, IP Ownership, Data Protection, Termination). Built for founders with no legal background. Flags red flags, explains risks in plain language,...
- 🇬🇧 icelandic-contract-review-magnus-smarason - Use this skill when asked to review, analyze, or draft a contract governed by Icelandic law. Triggers on requests involving Icelandic commercial agreements, consumer contracts, sales agreements, service contracts, or any contract where I...
- 🇵🇱 ktzr-polskie-umowy-gospodarcze-adam-piotrowski - Skill do analizy i tworzenia umów według polskiego prawa, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem umów B2B, IP i IT (body leasing, NDA, wdrożenia, SaaS, przeniesienie praw autorskich, ugody). Powstał w Kancelarii Radców Prawnych Żurawska Piotrowsk...
- 🇬🇧 nda-reviewer-anthropic - Screen incoming NDAs and classify them as GREEN (standard), YELLOW (needs review), or RED (significant issues). Use when a new NDA comes in from sales or business development, when assessing NDA risk level, or when deciding whether an ND...
- 🇬🇧 nda-reviewer-jamie-tso - Reviews incoming one-way (unilateral) commercial NDAs in a jurisdiction-agnostic way, from either a Recipient or Discloser perspective (user-selected), producing a clause-by-clause issue log with preferred redlines, fallbacks, rationales...
- 🇬🇧 playbook-reviewer-anthropic - Review contracts against your organization's negotiation playbook, flagging deviations and generating redline suggestions. Use when reviewing vendor contracts, customer agreements, or any commercial agreement where you need clause-by-cla...
- 🇬🇧 tech-contract-negotiator-patrick-munro - Guide to negotiating technology services agreements, professional services contracts, and commercial B2B transactions. Provides three-position frameworks (provider-favorable, balanced, client-favorable), deal-size tactics, objection hand...
- 🇬🇧 tech-contract-review-parth-desai - Jurisdiction-aware review of technology and commercial contracts — MSA, DPA, SOW, LOE, NDA, SLA, EULA, IP assignment, vendor/supplier, and API/platform ToS. Classifies every clause (acceptable / negotiate / red-flag / missing), proposes...
- 🇬🇧 tos-clause-scanner-moonshot-ai - Audit Terms of Service, user agreements, and privacy policies for consumer risks, producing a structured report that flags unfair clauses, data traps, and liability issues. Trigger when a user asks to review, audit, or analyze a ToS, pri...
- 🇬🇧 yc-saas-drafter-victor-wang - Drafts a customized SaaS Customer Agreement starting from the Y Combinator standard form SaaS template. Runs a structured intake covering fee structure, data handling, ML/AI rights, implementation services, SLA, and governing law, then a...
Compliance
- 🇬🇧 ai-audit-trail-larissa-meredith-flister - This skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow...
- 🇬🇧 ai-governance-reviewer-carl-ditzler - Conduct AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk reviews of internal AI use cases, AI product features, LLM workflows, or third-party AI vendors. The skill runs a structured intake process, identifies r...
- 🇫🇷 analyse-sanctions-et-exportations-gillan-saleh - Outil d'analyse des sanctions économiques internationales et du contrôle des exportations pour Claude Desktop. Screening individuel en temps réel sur 30+ listes officielles (ONU, UE, OFAC, OFSI, DGT France...), analyse sectorielle, biens...
- 🇬🇧 argentine-supreme-court-analysis-adrian-lerer - PageRank-based jurisprudential authority analysis for Argentine case law (CSJN, federal courts). Peer-reviewed methodology published in JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Ranks precedents by citation network influence with tempo...
- 🇵🇹 bacen-compliance-sentinel-rafael-mastronardi - Orientação completa sobre conformidade com regulamentações do Banco Central do Brasil: Resolução CMN nº 4.893/2021 (Política de Segurança Cibernética), Resolução BCB nº 85/2021 (GRSIC), Open Finance Brasil (Resoluções BCB nº 32/2020 e at...
- 🇬🇧 cmmc-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert CMMC 2.0 (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) advisor for US defense contractors and subcontractors in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). Use this skill whenever a user asks about CMMC 2.0, CMMC Level 1, Level 2, or Level...
- 🇬🇧 cra-vulnerability-obligations-ansvar-ai - Cited EU Cyber Resilience Act assessment for a product with digital elements: scope, product classification, role-specific vulnerability-handling duties, and Article 14 reporting - joined with live CVE / CISA-KEV / EPSS vulnerability int...
- 🇬🇧 cross-regulatory-impact-analyzer-patrick-munro - Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated complian...
- 🇬🇧 ear-tanaji-hemant-naik - Export Administration Regulations (EAR, 15 CFR Parts 730-774) compliance advisor — ECCN classification across all 10 CCL categories and 5 product groups (A-E), EAR99 determination, jurisdiction analysis (EAR vs ITAR order of review), lic...
- 🇬🇧 enforcement-action-analysis-amir-fadavi - Analyze any OFAC or OFSI enforcement action — by URL, pasted text, or uploaded document — and produce a structured root cause analysis as a formatted Excel (.xlsx) spreadsheet. Use this skill whenever a user names, links to, pastes, or u...
- 🇬🇧 eu-ai-act-examination-report-generator-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Generate a formal, structured AI Act compliance assessment report suitable for legal files, audit trails, and regulatory inquiries. Supports multiple output formats: full assessment report, classification record (Prüfprotokoll), complian...
- 🇬🇧 eu-ai-act-high-risk-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Depth assessment of whether an AI system is high-risk under Art. 6 of the EU AI Act, grounded in the Commission's draft Art. 6(5) classification guidelines (general principles + Annex I + Annex III). Covers the Annex I product-safety rou...
- 🇬🇧 eu-ai-act-high-risk-implementation-readiness-werner-plutat - Assess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when...
- 🇬🇧 eu-ai-act-knowledge-base-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents, including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification. Answers any EU AI Act question with article-level citations from the full regula...
- 🇬🇧 eu-ai-act-obligations-mapper-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Map the full set of legal obligations based on role and risk tier under the EU AI Act, producing an actionable compliance matrix with RACI assignments, implementation priorities, GDPR cross-references, and a phased implementation roadmap.
- 🇬🇧 eu-ai-act-quick-assessment-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary AI Act classification and compliance assessment. Produces a preliminary output with risk tier, role, top obligations, compliance timeline, and jurisdiction flags, then routes to detailed skills fo...
- 🇬🇧 eu-ai-act-role-determination-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Determine the organization's role under the EU AI Act — provider (Anbieter), deployer (Betreiber), importer, distributor, or quasi-provider — and assess Art. 25 quasi-provider risk from substantial modifications, rebranding, or changed i...
- 🇬🇧 eu-ai-act-system-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Determine whether a technology qualifies as an AI system under Art. 3(1) and classify its risk tier (prohibited, high-risk, GPAI with systemic risk, limited risk, minimal risk). Covers scope exclusions (Art. 2), AI system definition test...
- 🇬🇧 eu-ai-act-system-classifier-werner-plutat - Classify an AI system under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and map the compliance obligations that follow. Walks Art. 2 scope exclusions, Art. 3(1) AI system definition (7-criteria test), Art. 5 prohibited practice screening,...
- 🇬🇧 eu-ai-act-transparency-assessor-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Assesses which of the Art. 50(1)-(5) transparency obligations of the EU AI Act apply to a given AI system's provider or deployer, grounded in the final Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content (June 2026) and the Commissi...
- 🇬🇧 eu-data-act-compliance-assessment-werner-plutat - Assess compliance obligations under the EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854) for connected products, IoT devices, data sharing, cloud switching, B2B fairness, B2G data access, dispute resolution, and international data transfers. Cove...
- 🇬🇧 eu-data-act-ryan-malek - A working tool for lawyers advising on the EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854). Hand it the facts of a matter and it returns a classification memo, a drafting starter, a verbatim regulation lookup, an applied legal analysis, or a gap...
- 🇬🇧 fundamental-rights-impact-assessment-eu-ai-act-art-27-werner-plutat - Assess whether a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is required under Article 27 EU AI Act, and structure or draft that assessment for a specific high-risk AI deployment. Covers deployer scope gating (public bodies and private e...
- 🇬🇧 gpai-code-of-practice-compliance-werner-plutat - Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), Articles 51-56. Covers GPAI model identification (Art. 3(63)), systemic risk model designation (Art. 3(65), Art. 51, 1...
- 🇬🇧 incident-reporting-navigator-ansvar-ai - One security incident can trigger several EU reporting regimes at once. This skill screens NIS2, GDPR, DORA, and the Cyber Resilience Act for each involved legal entity, applies the served trigger tests, checks each duty was actually in...
- 🇬🇧 iso27001-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert ISO 27001 compliance assistant for security and compliance teams. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO 27001 or ISO/IEC 27001, including any of the following: gap analysis, auditing, compliance assessments, control checkl...
- 🇬🇧 itar-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert ITAR compliance advisor for US defense contractors, exporters, and manufacturers. Use this skill for any question about 22 CFR Parts 120-130, the United States Munitions List (USML), DDTC registration, export license applications...
- 🇬🇧 legal-risk-assessment-moonshot-ai - Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior c...
- 🇬🇧 legal-risk-assessment-zacharie-laik - Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior c...
- 🇬🇧 legal-risk-assessor-anthropic - Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior c...
- 🇵🇱 monitor-prawa-ue-i-polskiego-grzegorz-skuza - Wyszukiwanie, pobieranie i analiza aktów prawnych UE oraz polskich aktów i projektów wdrażających regulacje UE (np. PPWR, CBAM, EUDR, ESPR, CSRD, CSDDD, GPSR, AI Act, baterie, ekoprojekt). Używaj, gdy użytkownik potrzebuje statusu prawne...
- 🇬🇧 morocco-ecommerce-compliance-audit-omar-laftouh - Performs a legal compliance audit for a Moroccan e-commerce website, focused on personal data protection (Law 09-08) and consumer contract disclosures/obligations (Law 31-08). Use this skill when a user asks to audit, check, or assess th...
- 🇬🇧 new-sanctions-designation-screening-test-amir-fadavi - Generate a spreadsheet of test entries — newly designated names from OFAC, OFSI, and EU sanctions lists plus deliberate variations of those names — to validate that a sanctions screening system catches fresh designations and is tuned to...
- 🇬🇧 nis2-navigator-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Structured NIS2 compliance assessment covering scope classification (Annex I/II, size thresholds, DORA/CIR checks), gap analysis across all 10 Art. 21 risk management measures with 0–4 maturity scoring and ISO 27001 references, and a pri...
- 🇬🇧 nist-ai-rmf-rafal-fryc - This skill helps you apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and can quote AI RMF subcategories and GenAI profile action IDs verbatim from NIST AI 100-1 and 600-1. The skill routes you to the correct category as needed and has three...
- 🇬🇧 privacy-policy-stephane-boghossian - A zero-hallucination privacy-policy generator that takes anyone — non-lawyer founder to lawyer — from a guided intake to a publishable, jurisdiction-aware privacy policy. Jurisdiction-first: it detects which laws apply from where your us...
- 🇬🇧 privilege-sentinel-emily-cabrera - Pre-flight privilege and work-product check for legal AI prompts. Use when the user is about to send legal content to a third-party AI surface and wants to know whether the prompt risks blowing attorney-client privilege or work-product p...
- 🇬🇧 regulatory-audit-generator-moonshot-ai - Builds compliance checklists for business scenarios involving GDPR, PIPL, or advertising/data laws. Outputs a structured checklist with check items, legal basis, risk levels, and actionable recommendations. Triggered by requests like "r...
- 🇬🇧 regulatory-deal-card-generator-patrick-munro - Generates standalone interactive HTML "deal cards" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user n...
- 🇬🇧 regulatory-threat-model-ansvar-ai - Runs a server-enforced STRIDE threat model and LINDDUN privacy threat model over a system described in prose, screens named dependencies against live CVE/KEV/EPSS data, and builds a cited screen of which EU security obligations (GDPR, NI...
- 🇬🇧 sanctions-and-export-analysis-gillan-saleh - Real-time individual screening across 30+ official lists (UN, EU, OFAC, OFSI, French DGT...), sectoral analysis, dual-use goods (EU Reg. 2021/821), US/China extraterritorial regimes (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), USD/SWIFT risk and jurisdiction...
- 🇬🇧 sanctions-screening-matei-clej - Screen a client, counterparty, payer or corporate against the sanctions lists published by the designating authorities themselves — the UK Sanctions List (FCDO), OFSI, the UN Security Council, the EU consolidated list and OFAC's SDN and...
- 🇬🇧 screening-alert-adjudication-amir-fadavi - Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SD...
- 🇬🇧 serious-incident-reporting-eu-ai-act-art-73-werner-plutat - Serious Incident Reporting (SIR) for high-risk AI systems under Article 73 EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Assess, qualify, draft, and submit Art. 73 SIR notifications across the four Art. 3(49) harm categories (death or serious h...
- 🇬🇧 soc2-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC...
- 🇬🇧 statute-briefer-seth-chandler - Briefs statutes and legislative Acts using the MAPS + RULES framework: a system-level map of the whole Act (citation and text status, purpose, structure, scope, definitions) plus operational rule-modules for each operative provision (ele...
- 🇬🇧 vendor-due-diligence-patrick-munro - Framework for assessing IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners. Creates structured risk assessments across financial, operational, compliance, security, and reputational dimensions with regulatory checklists (...
- 🇬🇧 whistleblower-policy-advisor-malik-taiar - Guide for (a) auditing an existing whistleblower system or (b) drafting a compliant reporting policy from a provided template. Covers EU Directive 2019/1937, the amended Sapin II law (Waserman 2022), Decree 2022-1284, CNIL guidelines, pu...
Corporate Law
- 🇫🇷 assignation-refere-communication-associe-selim-brihi - Rédaction d'assignations en référé pour obtenir la communication forcée de documents sociaux à un associé sur le fondement de l'article L. 238-1 du code de commerce. À utiliser quand un associé se voit refuser l'accès aux comptes annuels...
- 🇬🇧 contract-review-kevin-lordy - Review legal contracts, NDAs, employment agreements, SaaS terms, and M&A documents. Identifies unfavorable terms, suggests redlines, and compares to market standards. Use for contract analysis, due diligence, or negotiation prep.
- 🇫🇷 gouvernance-societes-cotees-gillan-saleh - Skill open source d'analyse documentaire à vocation scientifique sur la gouvernance des sociétés cotées françaises (SBF 120). Il agrège, sous forme d'index sourcés à la page près, le corpus réglementaire et doctrinal 2020-2025 — rapports...
- 🇬🇧 icelandic-company-formation-magnus-smarason - Use this skill when asked about forming, registering, or structuring a company in Iceland. Triggers on questions about Icelandic business entities (ehf, hf, sf, svf, ses), capital requirements, registration with Fyrirtækjaskrá, governanc...
- 🇬🇧 indian-foreign-investment-approval-assessment-siddhi-kudalkar - Assess whether Government of India approval is required for foreign investment in an Indian company under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Non-Debt Instruments Rules, 2019. The skill systematically gathers transaction detail...
Criminal Law
- 🇬🇧 extradition-case-law-search-matei-clej - Searches the domestic courts of 122 jurisdictions — 153 databases, 49 automated — for extradition and arrest-warrant surrender decisions, each in its own language and vocabulary. Answers the question no commercial database does: how are...
Data Protection
- 🇫🇷 analyse-rgpd-de-dpa-fournisseur-hugo-salard - Analyse systématique d'un Data Processing Agreement (DPA) au regard de l'article 28 RGPD, des lignes directrices EDPB 07/2020 et 02/2024, des Clauses Contractuelles Types 2021 et du Règlement (UE) 2024/1689. Produit un rapport structuré...
- 🇫🇷 audit-conformite-rgpd-site-internet-hugo-salard - Audit de conformité RGPD d'un site internet par un praticien RGPD/DPO. Observation systématique selon une checklist en 10 sections (mentions légales, hébergeur, formulaires, newsletter, politique de confidentialité, cookies, mots de pass...
- 🇬🇧 ccpa-cpra-tanaji-hemant-naik - California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance advisor — business threshold analysis, consumer rights fulfillment (access, delete, correct, opt-out of sale/sharing, limit SPI, ADMT opt-out), pr...
- 🇬🇧 cookie-policy-generator-malik-taiar - Guide for drafting cookie policies compliant with GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive. Includes CNIL 2020 recommendations, a reference template, and best practices. Use when drafting or revising a cookie policy for a website or application.
- 🇬🇧 data-processing-agreement-art-28-gdpr-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Review, draft, or redline a Data Processing Agreement (DPA / Auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag / AVV) under Art. 28 GDPR, or prepare a Joint Controller Arrangement under Art. 26 GDPR (basic). Supports bilingual output (DE/EN), both controller...
- 🇬🇧 dpdpa-gdpr-compliance-review-parth-desai - Performs structured compliance review, clause redlining, and drafting suggestions for legal documents (privacy policies, data processing agreements, vendor and SaaS contracts) against India's DPDPA 2023 and the EU GDPR. Flags clauses as...
- 🇬🇧 dpdpa-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert India Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about the DPDPA, DPDP Act, DPDP Rules 2025, India data privacy law, Data Fiduciary obligations, Data Principal rights...
- 🇬🇧 dpia-sentinel-oliver-schmidt-prietz - GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) guidance under Article 35 GDPR, EDPB Guidelines WP 248 rev.01, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI), and national SA blacklists/whitelists. Covers threshold assessment, multi-jurisdictional blacklist ch...
- 🇬🇧 gdpr-breach-sentinel-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Incident response and legal compliance guidance for data breaches under GDPR Articles 33 & 34. Covers breach risk assessment using ENISA severity methodology, Controller vs Processor obligations, 72-hour notification clock management, ED...
- 🇬🇧 gdpr-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices,...
- 🇬🇧 icelandic-privacy-review-magnus-smarason - Use this skill when asked to review data protection or privacy compliance under Icelandic law and GDPR. Triggers on requests involving personal data processing, privacy policies, DPIA assessments, kennitala handling, Persónuvernd filings...
- 🇬🇧 indian-dpdp-act-consent-notice-siddhi-kudalkar - Draft or review a DPDPA-compliant consent notice under India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025. Provide basic details about your business and this skill handles the rest - build...
- 🇬🇧 iso27701-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert ISO 27701 Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 27701:2025, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, privacy information management, PIMS certification, PII controller or pro...
- 🇬🇧 legitimate-interest-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Conducts a structured Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) under Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the full EDPB three-step test — interest identification, strict necessity analysis, and the balancing test with mitigation. Built on EDPB Guidelines...
- 🇵🇹 lgpd-sentinel-rafael-mastronardi - Orientação LGPD para operações de tratamento no Brasil. Cobre bases legais (Art. 7º e Art. 11), RIPD, incidentes (Arts. 48-49), direitos dos titulares (Art. 18) e transferências internacionais. Triggers: LGPD, RIPD, ANPD, proteção de dad...
- 🇬🇧 lgpd-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert LGPD compliance advisor for Brazil's Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (Law 13,709/2018). Use this skill whenever a user asks about LGPD, Brazilian data protection, ANPD, personal data processing in Brazil, data subject rights under...
- 🇬🇧 privacy-compliance-advisor-anthropic - Navigate privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA), review DPAs, and handle data subject requests. Use when reviewing data processing agreements, responding to data subject access or deletion requests, assessing cross-border data transfer require...
- 🇬🇧 privacy-notice-generator-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Draft GDPR-compliant privacy notices as .docx for any EU/EEA jurisdiction and audience. Supports five notice types (Website/App, Applicant, Employee, Business Partner, B2C Customer) across DE, FR, AT, IT, ES, NL, BE, IE, and UK GDPR. Cov...
- 🇬🇧 privacy-policy-generator-malik-taiar - Guide for drafting privacy policies compliant with GDPR. Includes CNIL 2020 recommendations, a reference template, and best practices. Use when drafting or revising a privacy policy for a website or application.
- 🇬🇧 transfer-impact-assessment-tia-oliver-schmidt-prietz - GDPR Transfer Impact Assessment for Chapter V transfers under the EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology, the CNIL TIA Guide (January 2025), and EDPB essential guarantees. Handles transfer qualification, Art. 45 adequacy fast-...
- 🇬🇧 vn-pdpl-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert Vietnam Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) compliance advisor for Law No. 91/2025/QH15 and implementing Decree 356/2025/ND-CP (effective January 1, 2026). Use this skill for gap analysis against the Vietnam PDPL, data subject rig...
Employment Law
- 🇬🇧 icelandic-labour-law-magnus-smarason - Use this skill when asked about Icelandic employment law, labour relations, workplace rights, or collective agreements. Triggers on questions about hiring, termination, working conditions, parental leave, trade unions, collective bargain...
- 🇫🇷 notification-licenciement-selim-brihi - Guide pour la rédaction de notifications de licenciement conformes au droit du travail français. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger, préparer, créer ou éditer une lettre de notification de licenciement, notamment po...
- 🇬🇧 settlement-agreement-review-andrew-bird - Reviews or drafts the agreement that pays an employee to settle their claims — and flags the statutory conditions that decide whether it actually binds them. Works under s.203 ERA 1996 for England & Wales. Flags apparent s.203 condition...
- 🇬🇧 unfair-dismissal-screener-andrew-bird - Screens a dismissal — proposed or already done — against the unfair dismissal framework for England & Wales, and shows where it is exposed. Structures the qualifying-service question, the automatically-unfair categories (no qualifying pe...
Environmental Law
- 🇬🇧 csrd-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about CSRD, European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), double materiality assessment, sustainabilit...
Health Law
- 🇬🇧 hipaa-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts. Use this skill whenever the user mentions HIPAA, PHI (Protected Health Information), ePHI, covered entities, business associates, healthcare data privacy, medical re...
Human Rights
- 🇫🇷 central-african-special-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer - “Verification-first” methodology for the Special Criminal Court of the Central African Republic, a hybrid court seated in Bangui. Every citation is verified against JusticeInfo, FIDH, HRW, and legal-tools.org; the official sites often re...
- 🇬🇧 court-of-bih-war-crimes-chamber-jeanne-sulzer - Verification-first methodology for Section I (War Crimes) of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Citations are verified against the Court of BiH, the ICTY/IRMCT archives and OSCE. Distinguishes ICTY-referred (Rule 11 bis) cases from loc...
- 🇬🇧 eccc-khmer-rouge-tribunal-jeanne-sulzer - Verification-first methodology for the ECCC (Khmer Rouge Tribunal). Every citation is verified against eccc.gov.kh, the ECCC archive or legal-tools.org. Covers Case File numbering, the 001/002/002-01/002-02 structure, the genocide findin...
- 🇬🇧 extraordinary-african-chambers-jeanne-sulzer - “Verification-first” methodology for the Extraordinary African Chambers, covering the Hissène Habré trial in Dakar. Every citation is verified against forumchambresafricaines.org and legal-tools.org. Covers the judgment of May 30, 2016,...
- 🇬🇧 icty-ictr-irmct-jeanne-sulzer - Verification-first methodology for the ICTY, the ICTR and the Residual Mechanism (IRMCT). Citations are verified against irmct.org, the Case Law and Unified Court Records databases, and legal-tools.org. Handles the IT/ICTR to MICT case-n...
- 🇬🇧 international-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer - Research, drafting, and analysis involving the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute system). Enforces a verification-first methodology — every case-law, decision, filing, warrant, and statement citation is verified against an autho...
- 🇬🇧 kosovo-specialist-chambers-jeanne-sulzer - Verification-first methodology for the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office (The Hague, applying Kosovo law). Citations are verified against scp-ks.org before use; appeal registry numbers are cited only once conf...
- 🇬🇧 nuremberg-tokyo-tribunals-jeanne-sulzer - Verification-first methodology for the post-WWII tribunals: the IMT at Nuremberg, the twelve Nuremberg Military Tribunals, and the IMTFE at Tokyo. Citations are verified against the official records (Blue/Green Series, Pritchard-Zaide) a...
- 🇬🇧 special-court-for-sierra-leone-jeanne-sulzer - Verification-first methodology for the Special Court for Sierra Leone and its Residual Special Court. Citations are verified against rscsl.org and legal-tools.org. Covers Taylor, the AFRC/CDF/RUF cases, the child-soldier and forced-marri...
- 🇬🇧 special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jeanne-sulzer - Verification-first methodology for the Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (JEP), Colombia's transitional justice court under the 2016 Acuerdo Final with FARC-EP. Citations are verified against jep.gov.co before use. Covers the 11 macrocas...
- 🇬🇧 special-panels-timor-leste-jeanne-sulzer - Verification-first methodology for the Special Panels for Serious Crimes of the Dili District Court (UNTAET, 2000–2006). Citations are verified against JSMP, the UN archives and legal-tools.org. Covers the Los Palos case, the Serious Cri...
- 🇬🇧 special-tribunal-for-lebanon-jeanne-sulzer - Verification-first methodology for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Citations are verified against the STL legacy archive and legal-tools.org. Covers the Ayyash et al. case, the two contempt cases (STL-14-05 New TV/Al-Khayat and STL-14-...
- 🇬🇧 unmik-regulation-64-panels-jeanne-sulzer - Verification-first methodology for the UNMIK Regulation 64 Panels of the Kosovo district courts (2000–2008). Citations are verified against UNMIK/EULEX archives and legal-tools.org. Keeps the Reg. 64 Panels distinct from the Kosovo Speci...
- 🇬🇧 wcag-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) advisor covering WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 — the W3C international accessibility standards. Use this skill whenever a user asks about WCAG success criteria, conformance levels (A/AA/AAA), a...
Immigration Law
- 🇫🇷 droit-etrangers-asile-el-ouertani-faouzi - Expertise complète en droit français des étrangers, de l'asile et de la nationalité — entrée et visas, séjour (CESEDA livre IV, AES, étranger malade, regroupement familial, métiers en tension), éloignement et contentieux (OQTF, IRTF, rét...
Intellectual Property
- 🇬🇧 originality-in-european-copyright-joris-deene - Determines whether a given subject matter qualifies for copyright protection under EU law by applying the Cofemel two-step test (concept of work + originality), grounded in fifteen CJEU judgments (including the most recent Mio/Konektra a...
- 🇬🇧 trademark-search-robb-miller - Run an attorney-facing knockout/availability trademark search across the United States and Canada. Use whenever a user (founder, client, or attorney) asks whether a brand, mark, name, logo, slogan, or product name is "available," "free t...
International Law
- 🇬🇧 customs-trade-law-onur-kafkas - U.S. customs and trade-law research assistant for HTS classification, CROSS ruling research, CIT/CAFC decision briefing, duty compilation (General + Special + Chapter 99 + AD/CVD + MPF/HMF), country of origin determination, FTA qualifica...
- 🇬🇧 icelandic-eea-gap-analysis-magnus-smarason - Use this skill when asked to analyze how Iceland has implemented an EU directive or regulation into national law, identify gaps between EU/EEA law and Icelandic implementation, or assess Iceland's compliance with EEA obligations. Trigger...
Legal Drafting
- 🇬🇧 canned-response-generator-anthropic - Generate templated responses for common legal inquiries and identify when situations require individualized attention. Use when responding to routine legal questions — data subject requests, vendor inquiries, NDA requests, discovery hold...
- 🇬🇧 client-explanation-translator-larissa-meredith-flister - Turn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or corresponden...
- 🇬🇧 connecticut-divorce-planner-stephane-boghossian - Claude skill that turns Claude into a Connecticut-specific divorce planner — nine operating modes from pre-flight intake to post-judgment modification, modeled on Untangle.us's feature surface and grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b, Practice B...
- 🇬🇧 divorce-practice-stephane-boghossian - AI co-counsel for divorce and family-law attorneys — a jurisdiction-portable scaffold spanning the full matter lifecycle. Eight operating modes mirror how a matter actually moves: intake and onboarding, financial disclosure, children and...
- 🇬🇧 en-uk-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-berg - A skill for anyone needing legal documents translated into publication-ready English. Hand it a Word file in any language; get back an English .docx with formatting preserved, delivering notably higher quality than e.g. Legora’s DeepL to...
- 🇬🇧 en-us-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-berg - A skill for anyone needing legal documents translated into publication-ready English. Hand it a Word file in any language; get back an English .docx with formatting preserved, delivering notably higher quality than e.g. Legora’s DeepL to...
- 🇬🇧 fintech-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian - An end-to-end method for drafting and finalising a complex, multi-pillar regulated fintech agreement — from intake to signature. Authored from a senior fintech lawyer's manual: a licensed payment-services provider engaging a counterparty...
- 🇬🇧 footnote-relegator-seth-chandler - Condense a scholarly legal article by moving nonessential detail from the body into substantive footnotes while preserving every word and keeping the argument self-sufficient. Handles Markdown and Word (.docx), integrates moved material...
- 🇬🇧 founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian - A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Tw...
- 🇫🇷 humaniseur-juridique-gary-haas - Les LLM écrivent du juridique qui ressemble à du juridique sans en être. Formules creuses, attributions vagues, hedging systématique, latin décoratif : un praticien repère ces tics en trois lignes. Un juge aussi. Ce skill scanne 17 patte...
- 🇬🇧 irac-prompt-builder-stephane-boghossian - Restructure any rough build, research, or legal-drafting request into an IRAC-shaped prompt — Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion — optimized for a frontier model. It's the bar-exam framework, repurposed as prompt engineering. The skill le...
- 🇬🇧 legal-design-assessment-mirza-chiragov - Audits a legal document against legal design principles. Scores the document on six pillars: language patterns (bureaucratese, archaisms, passive voice, nominalization), readability (Flesch Reading Ease and language-specific equivalents)...
- 🇬🇧 legal-document-drafting-alessandro-dardano - Produces properly-formatted legal documents in Word (.docx). The user provides the substantive content (instructions, attached files, project knowledge); the skill handles document architecture and formatting. * No precedent or template...
- 🇬🇧 persuasive-legal-writing-larissa-meredith-flister - Apply elite legal writing techniques drawn from Justice Kagan, Boies & Olson, and other top advocates to any legal document — briefs, submissions, letters, opinions, memos, or persuasive correspondence. Covers both prose craft (clarity,...
- 🇬🇧 source-locked-verification-larissa-meredith-flister - Forces Claude to answer only from user-provided materials and online sources it has actually accessed. No inference, no assumptions, no gap-filling. Every factual, legal, numerical, or procedural claim must be anchored to a cited source,...
- 🇬🇧 tabular-review-antoine-louis - Guide to analyze multiple documents (PDF, DOCX) against user-defined columns and produce a structured Excel output with citations. Use when the user wants to: (1) Extract specific information from multiple documents into a table, (2) Com...
Legal Education
- 🇬🇧 california-bar-complete-robb-miller - Guide for end-to-end California Bar Exam prep — the five essays (13 subjects), the 90-minute Performance Test, and the 200-question MBE (7 subjects). Built by a practicing attorney who used it to compress four months of prep into a week...
- 🇬🇧 case-briefer-seth-chandler - Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion analysis, five future-application hypoth...
- 🇬🇧 jev-question-translator-seth-chandler - Turns a legal question, a set of draft questions, or source material such as a statute, jury instruction, rubric, contract checklist, or coding manual into a battery of narrow questions that TypeSafe's Jev, a fast classifier that returns...
- 🇬🇧 law-review-editor-seth-chandler - Rigorous multi-pass editor for law review articles, student notes, seminar papers and other legal scholarship. Runs six specialized passes — structure, substantive critique, Bluebook citations, grammar and clarity, fact-checking against...
- 🇬🇧 legal-ai-simulator-patrick-munro - Framework for demonstrating AI capabilities in legal contexts. Provides detailed personas across tenant law, business contracts, startup disputes, employment claims, and consumer protection with progressive complexity scenarios. Use when...
- 🇬🇧 legal-test-builder-patrick-munro - Builds a high-fidelity interactive legal assessment as a single self-contained HTML artifact. Output includes a live countdown timer, contract review tasks with hover-annotated problem clauses, candidate answer textareas, model answers h...
- 🇫🇷 mandarinat-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz - Assistant académique pour enseignants-chercheurs en droit. Six tâches : (1) recherche juridique approfondie avec accent doctrinal, (2) relecture de documents avec vérification des références, commentaires Word, détection d'indices de pla...
- 🇬🇧 mediation-problem-generator-seth-chandler - Create original, competition-ready commercial mediation problems and confidential packets with iterative validation. Use when a user provides a topic, industry, dispute sketch, or existing general-information packet and wants a public pa...
- 🇬🇧 mediation-problem-validator-seth-chandler - Evaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, nu...
- 🇫🇷 note-de-synthese-crfpa-allison-fiorentino - Génération de sujets d'entraînement complets pour l'épreuve de NOTE DE SYNTHÈSE (5 heures, coefficient 3) de l'examen d'accès au CRFPA : choix du sujet, dossier documentaire de 16 à 20 documents assemblé à partir de sources réelles vérif...
- 🇫🇷 qcm-generateur-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz - Génération assistée de QCM (questionnaires à choix multiples) avec export vers Moodle (GIFT, XML), Wooclap (Excel), Kahoot! et Word. Supporte QCM légers (ludiques) et approfondis (évaluatifs), à choix unique et réponses multiples.
- 🇬🇧 reader-first-technical-edit-seth-chandler - Edit mathematically, empirically, or technically dense papers for readers outside the author’s specialty, including empirical legal scholarship, law-and-economics models, and legal-technology research. Clarifies terminology, antecedents,...
- 🇫🇷 relecteur-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz - Optimise Claude pour la relecture des textes en français, qu'ils soient littéraires, techniques, professionnels... Vérification de la grammaire, de l'orthographe, traque des barbarismes, suggestions de modifications stylistiques.
- 🇫🇷 sujet-crfpa-allison-fiorentino - Ce skill génère des sujets d'entraînement pour les deux épreuves écrites de consultation du CRFPA : l'épreuve de droit des obligations (tronc commun) et l'épreuve de spécialité (civil, affaires, social, pénal, administratif, internationa...
- 🇬🇧 thesis-assesor-seth-chandler - Critically assess and improve a legal scholarly thesis, article idea, student note, seminar-paper claim, or research agenda using Eugene Volokh's novelty, nonobviousness, utility, and soundness framework, connector-aware research, claim-...
Legal Operations
- 🇬🇧 agentic-delegation-audit-adrian-lerer - Use when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on someone's behalf: send messages, search, draft, file, pay, delete, connect to accounts, use tools, or rely on external data. Produces a practical delegati...
- 🇬🇧 ambiguity-report-seth-chandler - Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page site, a self-contained single-file HTML page,...
- 🇬🇧 billable-time-stephane-boghossian - When your bar comes asking "show me how you billed AI-assisted work" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude...
- 🇬🇧 billing-cycle-manager-scott-margetts - Operational billing execution for legal matters. Monthly bill prep and billing instructions, LC invoice review and disbursement treatment, client billing query responses, cashflow modelling, and leverage and burn analysis (staffing mix,...
- 🇬🇧 budget-and-fee-manager-scott-margetts - Build, monitor, and adjust fee budgets across the full matter lifecycle. At matter setup: translate scope into a phase-based fee estimate with contingency and AFA structure. In flight: run WIP reviews that explain variance, not just repo...
- 🇬🇧 collaboration-platform-advisor-scott-margetts - Collaboration platform configuration methodology for legal matter sites. Site architecture, workflow identification, dashboard design, data quality governance, and user adoption for SharePoint, Teams, and equivalent platforms. Outputs ar...
- 🇬🇧 continuous-improvement-engine-scott-margetts - Capture, structure, and recycle lessons from active and closed legal matters. Three modes: in-flight capture (triggered by scope changes, risk events, status updates), mid-matter review (phase gates or quarterly), and matter close retros...
- 🇬🇧 decision-ownership-audit-adrian-lerer - Audits AI-assisted legal, compliance, governance, and institutional decisions before reliance to determine whether the responsible human or institution has enough access to the evidence, reasoning basis, uncertainty, authority, and revie...
- 🇬🇧 document-approval-tracker-scott-margetts - Approval cascade definition and tracking for multi-stakeholder document workflows. Internal review sequences, client approval workflows, regulatory review, overdue chasing with escalation logic, version control coordination, and cross-ju...
- 🇬🇧 eardraft-seth-chandler - Transforms reading-oriented prose into listening-optimized text for flat, neutral vocal delivery — TTS, podcasts, audiobooks, CLE audio. Carries a legal layer: case citations, section symbols, subsection lettering, Latin terms and footno...
- 🇬🇧 engagement-terms-billing-guidelines-scott-margetts - Drafts, reviews, and maintains outside counsel guidelines (OCGs) — the operational document that sets expectations for how external law firms bill, staff, communicate, and deliver legal services. OCGs are the single lowest-cost, highest-...
- 🇬🇧 epistemic-fault-line-audit-adrian-lerer - Audits legal AI outputs, prompts, skills, workflows and MCP/tool instructions for fluent but unsupported reasoning, missing evidence, overconfidence, hidden assumptions, weak causal links and absent human-review gates.
- 🇬🇧 fee-arrangement-structuring-scott-margetts - AFA design, scope-to-fee matching, negotiation preparation, health check, and scope dispute assessment for in-house legal ops teams managing outside counsel arrangements. Design fee structures (fixed, capped, collar, blended, phased, suc...
- 🇬🇧 invoice-review-compliance-scott-margetts - Reviews outside counsel invoices against billing guidelines, flags non-compliant entries by category, and produces the documents needed to approve, reduce, reject, and communicate those decisions. Covers the full invoice compliance workf...
- 🇬🇧 legal-diagram-sam-zhai - Turns dense legal documents, matter notes, and brainstorming dumps into clear, editable Mermaid diagrams to make strategizing and communicating clearer and faster. Use timelines and Gantt charts to uncover chronology gaps, flowcharts and...
- 🇬🇧 legal-guidance-vault-michael-cremata - Helps a lawyer build and use a personalized Legal Guidance Vault — a local folder of structured, privilege-marked entries capturing legal guidance they've given, searchable later by topic, person, or product. Use this skill when the user...
- 🇬🇧 legal-mdl-audit-adrian-lerer - Audits legal AI outputs and workflows for honest compression: unnecessary complexity, false simplicity, excessive caveats, hidden uncertainty and poor cost per legally acceptable output.
- 🇬🇧 legal-transition-audit-adrian-lerer - Audits the transition from legal AI output to reliance, recommendation, execution, or real-world commitment. Use it before an AI-generated analysis, memo, contract review, compliance finding, or workflow output is acted upon to check whe...
- 🇬🇧 local-counsel-manager-scott-margetts - End-to-end external local counsel lifecycle management for multi-jurisdiction legal matters. LC selection criteria and capability assessment, engagement setup and instruction design, performance monitoring and check-in cadence, scope enf...
- 🇬🇧 matter-allocation-instruction-scott-margetts - Executes matter allocation and firm engagement from firm selection through to a live, properly-instructed matter. Match the right firm to a new matter using the right-sourcing framework. Produce a complete matter instruction ready to sen...
- 🇬🇧 matter-intake-scoping-scott-margetts - Matter scoping across the full pre-execution arc — organise client data into a structured brief, capture the agreed baseline, or reconstruct scope mid-flight. Use when making sense of client information before a proposal, scoping a new m...
- 🇬🇧 matter-plan-builder-scott-margetts - Convert agreed scope into a structured matter plan — phases, workstreams, milestones, dependencies, owner assignments, and matter setup decisions. Use when planning a new matter, running a kickoff, building a workstream plan, structuring...
- 🇬🇧 meeting-briefing-preparator-anthropic - Prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance and track resulting action items. Use when preparing for contract negotiations, board meetings, compliance reviews, or any meeting where legal context, background research, o...
- 🇬🇧 oral-argument-stephane-boghossian - Tribunal-prep skill modeled on Neal Katyal's Nov 2025 SCOTUS tariffs argument and his AI sparring partner "Harvey." Five phases: (1) profile each decision-maker from prior opinions, questions, concurrences, and dissents — surface their d...
- 🇬🇧 outside-counsel-billing-and-performance-reviewer-carl-ditzler - Reviews outside counsel invoices and related billing data for an in-house legal department, including LEDES or e-billing exports, OCGs, approved rates, discounts, budgets, AFAs, and staffing rules. Starts with internal comparisons before...
- 🇬🇧 panel-design-selection-scott-margetts - Designs panel structures, defines firm selection criteria, runs right-sourcing analysis, and assesses coverage gaps for in-house legal teams building or formalising their outside counsel panel. Panel design is not panel review. Design as...
- 🇬🇧 panel-review-rationalisation-scott-margetts - Executes the annual panel review cycle and ongoing panel governance decisions. Synthesises performance scorecard data, billing compliance records, and step-out patterns into panel-level recommendations. Produces the documentation for fir...
- 🇬🇧 performance-scorecard-scott-margetts - Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Encodes the methodology for collecting, aggregating, and acting on firm performa...
- 🇬🇧 resource-planner-scott-margetts - Team structure, gearing analysis, continuity planning, and competing demand management for legal matters. Use when setting up a matter team, reviewing whether work is being done at the right grade, planning cover for an unavailable team...
- 🇬🇧 rfp-pitch-management-scott-margetts - Runs structured RFP processes for selecting outside counsel — from drafting the initial document through evaluating firm responses and producing a defensible selection recommendation for GC sign-off. An average law firm spends 47 hours o...
- 🇬🇧 risk-and-issues-manager-scott-margetts - RAID log methodology with decision extraction from emails and meeting notes. Use when asked to identify risks, log assumptions, track issues, extract decisions from correspondence, create or update a RAID log, escalate a risk to an issue...
- 🇬🇧 scope-change-controller-scott-margetts - Scope management for legal matters — baseline capture, in-flight change control, OOS documentation, and scope retrospective. Use when asked to review scoping assumptions, assess whether work is in or out of scope, draft a scope change no...
- 🇬🇧 stakeholder-comms-planner-scott-margetts - Stakeholder mapping, communication plan design, reporting hierarchy, and mid-matter comms updates. Use when setting up a new matter and needing to identify who needs what information, designing the communication rhythm, building reportin...
- 🇬🇧 status-report-drafter-scott-margetts - Draft matter status reports from emails, call notes, and updates. Internal and client-facing formats, RAG logic, variance commentary, escalation flags. Use when asked to draft a status report, write a project update, summarise matter pro...
- 🇬🇧 timeline-generator-scott-margetts - Build dependency network and critical path from a matter plan. Produce an interactive Gantt, flag near-critical tasks, and run what-if cascade scenarios when delays occur — showing programme impact and drafting communications. Produces f...
Legal Research
- 🇫🇷 archeologue-gallica-allison-fiorentino - Recherche dans les fonds juridiques anciens numérisés par la BNF (API Gallica, sans clé) : débats parlementaires du JO depuis 1871, doctrine d'origine (Sirey, Dalloz, thèses du XIXe), jurisprudence ancienne (Bulletins civil et criminel,...
- 🇫🇷 assistant-juridique-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz - Assistant juridique expert couvrant le droit français, européen (UE et CEDH) et étranger via LegalDataHunter, pour professionnels et chercheurs. Couvre dix tâches : cadrage, recherche juridique, consultation, rédaction d'actes, analyse d...
- 🇬🇧 employment-law-research-yue-deng-wu - This Skill creates a research brief for an area of US employment law. The brief can address a specific question or be a multi-state survey. It'll include citations to primary sources (e.g. statutes, rule, government guidance), and reputa...
- 🇬🇧 eu-legislation-malik-taiar - Access EU law. Search and retrieve Directives, Regulations, Treaties and CJEU case law from EUR-Lex.
- 🇬🇧 gibraltar-regulatory-compliance-osint-philip-vasquez - A jurisdiction-grounding reference file for AI assistants working on Gibraltar legal, regulatory, and compliance research. Corrects systematic errors AI models make when applying English law to Gibraltar — a distinct jurisdiction under t...
- 🇮🇹 giurisprudenza-lampo-giovanna-panucci - Ricerca rapida della giurisprudenza italiana, finalizzata a fornire un primo quadro orientativo su una determinata questione giuridica. Consulta le pronunce della Corte di cassazione, dei TAR e del Consiglio di Stato, nonché le banche da...
- 🇬🇧 icelandic-court-case-finder-magnus-smarason - Use this skill when asked to find, cite, analyze, or summarize Icelandic court decisions. Triggers on requests involving Hæstiréttur (Supreme Court), Landsréttur (Court of Appeal), Félagsdómur (Labour Court), héraðsdómur (District Court)...
- 🇬🇧 icelandic-legal-terminology-magnus-smarason - Use this skill when asked to translate, explain, or map Icelandic legal terms to English (or vice versa). Triggers on requests involving Icelandic legal vocabulary, legal translation, understanding Icelandic statutes or court decisions,...
- 🇪🇸 investigacion-juridica-matias-gv-rojas-faundez - Asistente jurídico experto en derecho chileno. Úsalo cuando el usuario haga consultas sobre normativa, códigos, procedimientos o jurisprudencia de Chile y necesite respuestas fundamentadas con cita de ley y artículo y una fuente verifica...
- 🇬🇧 legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian - Routes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey'...
- 🇬🇧 legal-analysis-forge-oliver-schmidt-prietz - EU Digital Regulation Legal Analysis Forge — generates a tailored expert prompt for structured legal analysis of an EU digital-regulation document, optionally executes it in-session, and always produces a plain-English explainer alongsid...
- 🇬🇧 mandatory-verification-larissa-meredith-flister - Mandatory external verification workflow for ALL non-trivial factual claims before presenting them as true. This skill MUST be used whenever Claude is asked to research any topic, answer factual questions, provide current information, dr...
- 🇬🇧 multi-jurisdictional-research-zacharie-laik - Multi-jurisdictional legal research and risk assessment using the Legal Data Hunter MCP (40+ countries, 13M+ documents). Use when the user asks about law across multiple countries, comparative law, cross-border regulatory analysis, or ca...
- 🇬🇧 proposition-audit-anthony-searle - Post-hoc verification and trust audit of AI-generated factual and interpretive claims. Classifies claims by type and salience, routes them to domain-appropriate sources, scores trustworthiness on a tiered scale with an Interpolated verdi...
- 🇫🇷 raisonnement-juridique-amaury-fouret - Modélise le raisonnement juridique d'un magistrat français pour l'analyse de dossiers civils. Utiliser ce skill pour analyser un litige et identifier les questions juridiques, construire un raisonnement juridique structuré (syllogisme),...
- 🇫🇷 recherche-doctrine-allison-fiorentino - Recherche académique dans les bases de données de doctrine juridique française, européenne et internationale. Utiliser cette skill lorsque l'utilisateur demande de rechercher des articles de doctrine, des thèses, des ouvrages académiques...
- 🇫🇷 recherche-jurisprudence-allison-fiorentino - Ce skill donne accès à l'API de judilibre. Vous formulez votre demande en français, il interroge la base Judlibre et renvoie les réponses. Attention le skill ne fonctionne que si des domaines supplémentaires sont utilisés et que l'utilis...
- 🇫🇷 recherche-jurisprudence-librejustice - Gratuit et open source, cette compétence fait chercher, vérifier et citer la jurisprudence française et européenne à votre assistant, sur les ~3,8 millions de décisions de LibreJustice. Sa règle première : aucune décision n'entre dans la...
- 🇫🇷 recherche-normes-librejustice - Gratuit et open source, cette compétence trouve et cite le texte applicable à la date qui compte, sur les ~3,7 millions d'articles de LibreJustice. La date d'abord, le texte ensuite : la version en vigueur aujourd'hui est la mauvaise pou...
- 🇫🇷 recherche-theses-allison-fiorentino - Recherche, cartographie et analyse des thèses de doctorat françaises via theses.fr (API ABES) et TEL (HAL). Spécialisée droit avec filtrage par sous-disciplines juridiques. Ouverte sur d'autres domaines universitaires. Capacités : (1) re...
- 🇬🇧 red-team-verifier-patrick-munro - Adversarial verification for AI-generated legal content with systematic fact-checking, source validation, and quality control. Use when verifying legal documents, fact-checking regulatory content, performing red team review, or quality a...
- 🇮🇹 ricerca-giuridica-it-silvio-mistretta - Skill for legal research on Italian and EU sources: legislation, administrative practice, and case law. Encode a working method, not an opinion: routing to official sources, citations with verifiable references, validity checks including...
- 🇬🇧 statute-analyzer-rafal-fryc - Guide for reading, interpreting, and applying statutes, regulations, and rules in legal and compliance contexts. Use when the user asks about (1) how to read and interpret statutes, regulations, or rules, (2) statutory interpretation met...
- 🇬🇧 swiss-legal-source-and-authority-triage-enrique-g-zbinden - Swiss legal source and authority triage. Use when a user asks a Swiss legal, regulatory, compliance, contract, employment, corporate, litigation, IP, tax, privacy, public-law, fintech, register, or cantonal-law question; when Swiss law m...
- 🇬🇧 uk-citation-verification-matei-clej - Verifies UK case-law citations, pinpoint references and quotations against the official public register — The National Archives' Find Case Law — and statutory references against legislation.gov.uk, before a document that cites them is re...
- 🇮🇹 verifica-fonti-michele-loi - Checks the formal coherence and plausibility of Italian and EU legal citations (statutes, case law) in text produced by Claude or other legal-AI skills. Reports clause-by-clause on what is well-formed, suspicious, or unresolvable against...
Litigation
- 🇬🇧 ambiguity-stress-test-seth-chandler - Adversarially stress-tests a legal text — a contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — for interpretive ambiguity: it finds the seams where the people governed by it will later disagree about what it means and turns each into a...
- 🇫🇷 assignation-refere-recouvrement-creance-selim-brihi - Rédaction d'assignations en référé devant le tribunal de commerce ou des activités économiques pour le recouvrement de créances commerciales. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger, préparer ou créer une assignation en...
- 🇬🇧 chronology-builder-andrew-bird - Builds a litigation chronology from the disclosure bundle itself — every entry attributed to its source document, behind a CPR 31.22 implied-undertaking check, because documents disclosed in English proceedings may only be used for those...
- 🇬🇧 client-instruction-schedule-serhan-handani-fx44146u - Build a client instruction schedule: a plain-English, Scott Schedule-style Word table that gathers a struggling client's evidence and instructions issue by issue, with a one-page covering note. Output is always a .docx draft for solicito...
- 🇬🇧 cpr-letter-drafter-andrew-bird - Writes the formal letter you send before suing someone in a civil case in England & Wales — the Letter Before Claim that starts the pre-action clock. The part it gets right is which pre-action protocol applies — debt, professional neglig...
- 🇬🇧 disclosure-list-andrew-bird - Works out which documents you have to hand over to the other side in a civil case in England & Wales, and builds the formal list. The part it gets right that trips people up is which disclosure regime applies — Practice Direction 57AD (t...
- 🇬🇧 disclosure-strategy-mapper-larissa-meredith-flister - This skill maps disclosure strategy from a case summary, pleading, chronology, or early case theory: the document categories that will matter, likely custodians, adverse material, evidential gaps, search themes, and the risks worth confr...
- 🇬🇧 isds-arbitrators-cameron-russell - Arbitrator research tool for investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), built for arbitration counsel. It produces reliable, structured, and thorough insights into arbitrators' experience, and can identify, evaluate, and rank the suitabil...
- 🇬🇧 isds-research-cameron-russell - Compliant, retrieval-grounded research over investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) awards and decisions. Use when the user asks about ICSID / investment-treaty arbitration cases, awards, or doctrines (fair and equitable treatment, expr...
- 🇬🇧 judicial-first-impression-larissa-meredith-flister - Assesses a legal argument, submission, or piece of structured reasoning from the perspective of a judge reading it cold under time pressure. Produces a structured seven-part assessment: what the case appears to be about, immediate points...
- 🇪🇸 litigacion-latam-joselyne-garcia-montesdeoca - Asesor experto en litigación civil latinoamericana bajo sistemas de derecho civil. Está diseñado para asistir a abogados litigantes, equipos legales internos y clientes directos con estrategia procesal, análisis de riesgos y orientación...
- 🇬🇧 litigation-deadline-calendar-dave-marcus - A plugin for calendaring litigation and arbitration deadlines from scheduling orders. Scans scheduling orders and outputs in a calendar file for Outlook or Google Calendar. Also permits inviting other team members via calendar invites.
- 🇬🇧 mediation-dispute-analysis-jinzhe-tan - Analyzes legal disputes for mediation purposes — reviewing case materials (pleadings, contracts, correspondence, evidence), identifying contested issues, summarizing each party's position and interests, performing legal analysis of key i...
- 🇬🇧 opposing-counsel-review-larissa-meredith-flister - Act as experienced opposing counsel to attack, undermine, and expose weaknesses in a legal argument, submission, witness statement, or structured reasoning. Produces a six-part adversarial analysis: 1. A core theory of attack identifying...
- 🇬🇧 pleading-injection-guard-matei-clej - Detects prompt injection hidden in documents from the other side (pleadings, skeletons, bundles, served evidence, opponents' emails and attachments) before an AI reads them, so the model is not turned against your client. Checks word by...
- 🇬🇧 pre-motion-andrew-bird - Adversarial premortem for England & Wales civil litigation - builds the strongest version of a case, then attacks it from four angles to find where it loses before opposing counsel does. Runs an adversarial premortem on a UK litigation m...
- 🇫🇷 requete-cph-licenciement-faute-grave-selim-brihi - Rédaction de requêtes devant le Conseil de prud'hommes pour contester un licenciement pour faute grave. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger une requête CPH, contester un licenciement pour faute grave, préparer une sa...
- 🇬🇧 settlement-pressure-tester-larissa-meredith-flister - This skill stress-tests a proposed settlement position before an offer goes out or comes back: the assumptions it depends on, your leverage and the opponent’s, the evidential weaknesses, the likely opponent response, and the timing and c...
- 🇬🇧 sustainable-opposing-counsel-review-seth-chandler - Produces an adversarial attack on a legal argument that survives reply. Runs the opposing-counsel discipline twice: an unrestrained first pass, then the same instrument turned on that pass to cut every point that collapses under challeng...
- 🇬🇧 without-prejudice-drafter-andrew-bird - Writes a settlement letter on the right footing — and warns you when marking it 'without prejudice' won't actually keep it out of court. A genuine settlement letter is normally protected (the judge can't see it), but only if the substanc...
Media Entertainment Sports
- 🇬🇧 nil-contract-reviewer-samir-patel - NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) contract analysis for NCAA student-athletes from the athlete's perspective. Use when user says 'review this NIL contract', 'analyze this NIL deal', 'check this athlete agreement', 'review my NIL agreement'...
Microsoft Office
- 🇬🇧 excel-editor-openai - Toolkit for comprehensive Spreadsheet reading, creation, editing, and analysis with visual quality control. Use to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Rea...
- 🇫🇷 normalisation-juridique-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz - La compétence Normalisation juridique FR nettoie un document Word rédigé en français juridique. Elle distingue deux régimes : les corrections déterministes (apostrophes courbes, guillemets français, espaces insécables, insécables des réf...
- 🇬🇧 outlook-malik-taiar - Read, search, and download emails and attachments from Microsoft Outlook via OAuth2. Use when the user asks to check, read, or fetch emails, search by keyword or sender, download attachments, or chain email content into other skills.
- 🇬🇧 word-editor-antoine-louis - Edit, query, and transform Word documents (.docx) with the SuperDoc CLI. Use when the user asks to read, search, modify, format, comment, track changes, or review changes in .docx files. Triggers on any task involving Word documents — te...
- 🇬🇧 word-editor-openai - Toolkit for comprehensive document reading and creation with visual quality control. Use to work with Word documents (.docx files) for: (1) Reading or extracting content from existing DOCX files, (2) Creating new Word documents with prof...
- 🇬🇧 word-editor-superdoc - Searches, replaces, and reads text in Word documents from the command line. Use when the user asks to edit, search, or extract text from .docx files.
Public Law
- 🇬🇧 fedramp-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government...
- 🇬🇧 ism-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert Australian Information Security Manual (ISM) advisor for government entities and their supply chains. Use for ISM control selection, gap analysis, system authorisation, IRAP assessment preparation, security documentation, and ASD...
- 🇬🇧 nist-800-53-tanaji-hemant-naik - NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailori...
- 🇬🇧 nzism-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) advisor for NZ government agencies and their supply chains. Use for NZISM control guidance, gap analysis, agency security obligations, classification framework (Unclassified through...
- 🇬🇧 section-508-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert Section 508 compliance advisor for US federal ICT accessibility. Use this skill whenever a user asks about Section 508, WCAG 2.0/2.1 AA for federal systems, VPAT or Accessibility Conformance Reports (ACR), accessibility audits, re...
Skill Authoring
- 🇬🇧 law-expertise-to-skill-adrian-lerer - Turn a lawyer's bounded expertise, workflow, review standard, or legal judgment pattern into a safe, inspectable legal AI skill. Use when a user provides legal memos, comments, checklists, negotiation notes, review habits, compliance pla...
- 🇬🇧 lawve-prep-seth-chandler - Takes a skill — a .skill or .zip archive, a bare SKILL.md, a folder, or just a raw idea — and produces a package ready for public distribution on lawve.ai, plus the exact entries for the submission form. Runs a gate first: skills with no...
- 🇬🇧 skill-creation-openai - Guide for creating effective skills. Use when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends the model's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.
- 🇬🇧 skill-improvement-malik-taiar - Guide to analyze a current work session and propose improvements to skills. Use (1) automatically after working with a skill to capture learnings, (2) when the user suggests improvements, corrections, or additions during a skill-related...
- 🇬🇧 skill-injection-defense-adrian-lerer - Audits legal AI skills, prompts, workflows, MCP/tool instructions, and agent packages before they are trusted or installed. It detects prompt injection, hidden or hostile instructions, unsafe scripts, suspicious frontmatter, credential e...
- 🇬🇧 skill-security-auditor-lawve - Audit an AI agent skill before installing it. Use proactively whenever the user is about to add, install, enable, or evaluate an unfamiliar skill — including phrases like "audit this skill", "is this skill safe", "scan skill before insta...
Technology Law
- 🇬🇧 az-eu-website-privacy-audit-mirza-chiragov - Audits a website for compliance with Azerbaijan's Law on Personal Data No. 998-IIIQ and, where applicable, EU GDPR plus ePrivacy/cookie consent rules. Inventories the privacy documents present (privacy policy, cookie policy, cookie banne...
- 🇬🇧 cis-controls-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert CIS Controls v8 (CIS Top 18) advisor — implementation group scoping (IG1/IG2/IG3), control gap assessments, safeguard-level guidance, asset inventory, software inventory, data protection, secure configuration, account management,...
- 🇬🇧 eu-ai-act-tanaji-hemant-naik - EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case a...
- 🇬🇧 eu-cra-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, p...
- 🇬🇧 eu-data-act-oliver-schmidt-prietz - Practitioner skill for EU Regulation 2023/2854 (Data Act). Covers Chapters II-VII (IoT data access, mandatory B2B sharing, unfair contract terms, public-sector exceptional need, cloud switching, third-country governmental access) and Cha...
- 🇬🇧 iso42001-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI...
- 🇬🇧 mcp-builder-anthropic - Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python...
- 🇬🇧 nis2-tanaji-hemant-naik - EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) compliance advisor for essential and important entities: entity classification, Art. 21 risk management measures, Art. 23 incident reporting timelines (24h/72h/1 month), Art. 20 governance obl...
- 🇬🇧 nist-ai-rmf-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor covering all four functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST AI RMF, AI risk management, AI trustworthiness, GOVERN function, MAP...
- 🇬🇧 nist-csf-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) advisor covering CSF 2.0 and CSF 1.1. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST CSF, cybersecurity risk management, the six CSF functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover...
Transport Maritime
- 🇬🇧 tsa-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik - Expert TSA cybersecurity compliance advisor for critical infrastructure owners and operators. Use this skill whenever a user asks about TSA Security Directives for pipelines, freight railroads, passenger rail, public transit, or bus oper...
Vibe Coding
- 🇬🇧 code-security-review-openai - Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Covers Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Go. Use when the user requests security best practices guidance, a security review or report, or s...
- 🇬🇧 vs-code-extension-antoine-louis - Build VS Code extensions from scratch or convert existing JS/React/Vue apps. Supports commands, webviews (React/Vue), custom editors, tree views, and AI agent integration via file-bridge IPC. Use when user wants to create a VS Code exten...
Contributing
It's easy! Visit lawve.ai/new/skill and fill out the form. No Git knowledge required.
Once approved, submitted skills are automatically synced to this repository. Note that every skill goes through a manual review before it is added to the list. We assess whether it offers real, practical value to legal professionals and screen it for security concerns.
Support
Lawve AI is the first-ever open hub dedicated to AI agent skills for law and it's growing every day thanks to the incredible contributors sharing their work and the community showing its support. If you find this list useful, consider giving it a ⭐ (it helps others discover it too).
License
This list is licensed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. This means you are welcome to fork, clone, copy and redistribute the list, provided you include appropriate attribution; however you are not permitted to distribute any modified versions or use it for commercial purposes. This is to prevent unlawful appropriation of the work of the authors whose resources are listed here.
Please note that all resources included in this list have their own license terms. If you wish to incorporate those authors' works into your own product, you need to do so according to the terms that those authors have set out.
Disclaimer
Although we take strong measures to uphold the quality and safety of this list, we take no responsibility or liability for anything bad that might happen as a result of these third-party resources. Make sure the skills you download are aligned with your firm's confidentiality policies and professional responsibility obligations.
Acknowledgments
Huge thanks to every contributor who has shared their work here, you're the reason this list keeps growing. And to everyone who has starred, forked, or simply bookmarked this repo: your support means more than you think. Finally, a hat tip to the Anthropic team, who developed the Skills standard and published the examples that got us all started.
{
"name": "lawve-ai",
"version": "2.0.0",
"description": "Curated agent skills for legal work",
"owner": {
"name": "Lawve AI",
"email": "contact@lawve.ai",
"url": "https://lawve.ai"
},
"plugins": [
{
"name": "pdf-editor-openai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Toolkit for comprehensive PDF reading and creation with visual quality control. Use to work with PDFs (.pdf files) for: (1) Reading or extracting content from existing PDFs, (2) Creating new PDF documents with professional formatting, (3) Generating reports, documents, or layouts that require precise typography and design, or any other PDF reading or generation tasks.",
"version": "2026.01.30",
"author": {
"name": "OpenAI"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Adobe Acrobat",
"skills": [
"./skills/pdf-editor-openai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "agent-authority-charter-builder-arkadiy-miteiko",
"source": "./",
"description": "Creates an Agent Authority Charter for enterprise or regulated AI agents before deployment. Use this Skill when a user needs to define what an AI agent is allowed to do, who delegated authority to it, what actions are permitted or prohibited, when human approval is required, what evidence must be preserved, and how the agent can be suspended, revoked, or escalated.",
"version": "2026-06-20",
"author": {
"name": "Arkadiy Miteiko"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Banking Finance",
"skills": [
"./skills/agent-authority-charter-builder-arkadiy-miteiko"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "dora-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classification or reporting, threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, Register of Information, contractual provisions with ICT providers, ICT concentration risk, oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs), or any DORA RTS/ITS obligation.",
"category": "Banking Finance",
"skills": [
"./skills/dora-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "due-diligence-gate-adrian-lerer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Use for due diligence, legal-financial risk review, investment or business transaction checklists, and preliminary screening where facts, documents, assumptions, legal uncertainty, debt/equity, assets/liabilities, contracts, tax, regulatory, compliance, technology/product, and financial-model issues must be separated clearly.",
"version": "2026-06-14",
"author": {
"name": "Ignacio Adrián Lerer"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Banking Finance",
"skills": [
"./skills/due-diligence-gate-adrian-lerer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "financial-comparison-glossary-adrian-lerer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Use when a calculator, financial model, investor memo, due diligence report, risk review, dashboard, or client-facing explanation needs clear distinctions between accounting and finance concepts such as cash flow vs profit, EBIT vs EBITDA, CapEx vs OpEx, debt vs equity, market value vs book value, ROI vs ROE, assets vs liabilities, and accounting vs finance.",
"version": "2026-06-14",
"author": {
"name": "Ignacio Adrián Lerer"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Banking Finance",
"skills": [
"./skills/financial-comparison-glossary-adrian-lerer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "pci-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert PCI DSS compliance advisor covering PCI DSS v4.0.1 (current) and v4.0. Use this skill whenever a user asks about PCI DSS, payment card security, cardholder data protection, CDE scoping, SAQ types (A, A-EP, B, B-IP, C, C-VT, P2PE, D), ROC, AOC, QSA assessments, ASV scans, merchant levels, service provider levels, network segmentation, penetration testing, tokenisation, encryption of PAN data, or any of the 12 PCI DSS requirements.",
"category": "Banking Finance",
"skills": [
"./skills/pci-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "runtime-admissibility-review-arkadiy-miteiko",
"source": "./",
"description": "Determines whether a specific AI-agent action, output, recommendation, or proposed commitment remains admissible for execution or institutional reliance under current authority, delegated scope, evidence, facts, policy, risk, escalation, and revocation conditions. Use this Skill before an enterprise or regulated AI agent executes, updates records, triggers workflows, communicates externally, or before an institution relies on an agentic output in a way that creates legal, financial, operational, regulatory, customer, employee, patient, citizen, market, contractual, or reputational consequence.",
"category": "Banking Finance",
"skills": [
"./skills/runtime-admissibility-review-arkadiy-miteiko"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "swift-csp-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert SWIFT Customer Security Programme (CSP) advisor covering the Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF v2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about SWIFT CSP, CSCF controls, SWIFT security attestation, KYC-SA portal, SWIFT architecture types (A1/A2/A3/A4/B), mandatory vs advisory controls, independent assessment, SWIFT secure zone, secure flow zone, MFA for operators, SWIFT messaging security, payment fraud prevention on SWIFT, gap analysis for CSCF, or compliance with SWIFT's 32 controls (25 mandatory, 7 advisory in v2026) across the three objectives: Secure Your Environment, Know and Limit Access, Detect and Respond. Control 2.4 (Back-Office Data Flow Security) is now mandatory in v2026. v2026 attestation window is July 1– December 31, 2026. Trigger for any SWIFT CSP or CSCF compliance question.",
"category": "Banking Finance",
"skills": [
"./skills/swift-csp-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "arbitration-clause-design-and-review-hafez-virjee",
"source": "./",
"description": "Draft, review and stress-test arbitration clauses in commercial contracts, with guidance on seat, institution, rules, confidentiality, governing law and commercial fit. In more detail, this workflow helps users identify drafting issues, assess whether an arbitration clause is workable and commercially aligned with the transaction, generate clean revised wording, and produce concise explanations or negotiation points. It is designed for in-house counsel, lawyers and commercial teams, and uses public arbitration resources including model clauses, GAP materials and institutional cost/duration sources where relevant.",
"author": {
"name": "Hafez Virjee"
},
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/arbitration-clause-design-and-review-hafez-virjee"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "climate-aligned-contracts-the-chancery-lane-project",
"source": "./",
"description": "Draft, adapt, and review contracts and clauses aligned with The Chancery Lane Project's methodology for reducing carbon emissions through legal agreements. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Draft new climate-aligned clauses (e.g., net zero commitments, carbon accounting, supply chain decarbonization), (2) Adapt or modify existing contracts to incorporate climate objectives, (3) Review and analyze clauses for alignment with climate goals and decarbonization strategies, (4) Provide guidance on The Chancery Lane Project's house style and drafting methodology for climate-conscious legal work.",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/climate-aligned-contracts-the-chancery-lane-project"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "contract-intelligence-workflow-reviewer-carl-ditzler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Contract intelligence and contract operations workflow skill for Claude and Codex. Guides the full contract lifecycle review process from intake and playbook normalization through clause review, deviation scoring, negotiation planning, approval routing, QA, and action recommendations. Reviews legal, business, operational, compliance, privacy, security, technology, and AI-related risks across contracts and legal documents. Supports NDAs, SaaS agreements, DPAs, procurement contracts, commercial agreements, contract comparisons, redlines, approval packages, clause research, and drafting. **Warning**-Comprehensive reviews can consume significant Claude/OpenAI tokens, especially for large agreements, playbooks, exhibits, schedules, and multi-document reviews.",
"version": "2026-06-23",
"author": {
"name": "Carl Ditzler"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/contract-intelligence-workflow-reviewer-carl-ditzler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "contract-risk-analyzer-sneha-ganapavarapu",
"source": "./",
"description": "Analyses contracts for risk across five critical clauses (Limitation of Liability, Indemnities, IP Ownership, Data Protection, Termination). Built for founders with no legal background. Flags red flags, explains risks in plain language, and provides negotiation guidance.",
"version": "2026-05-17",
"author": {
"name": "Sneha Ganapavarapu"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/contract-risk-analyzer-sneha-ganapavarapu"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "icelandic-contract-review-magnus-smarason",
"source": "./",
"description": "Use this skill when asked to review, analyze, or draft a contract governed by Icelandic law. Triggers on requests involving Icelandic commercial agreements, consumer contracts, sales agreements, service contracts, or any contract where Icelandic mandatory rules may apply.",
"version": "2026-04-13",
"author": {
"name": "Magnus Smári Smárason"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/icelandic-contract-review-magnus-smarason"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "ktzr-polskie-umowy-gospodarcze-adam-piotrowski",
"source": "./",
"description": "Skill do analizy i tworzenia umów według polskiego prawa, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem umów B2B, IP i IT (body leasing, NDA, wdrożenia, SaaS, przeniesienie praw autorskich, ugody). Powstał w Kancelarii Radców Prawnych Żurawska Piotrowski i Wspólnicy (ktzr.pl). Używaj zawsze gdy użytkownik prosi o przeanalizowanie polskiej umowy, audyt ryzyk umownych, wygenerowanie nowej umowy w stylu KTZR, dodanie/edycję klauzuli, sprawdzenie spójności umowy lub gdy wkleja/załącza polski dokument umowny do oceny. Stosuj również gdy pojawia się pojęcie \"Złote Reguły KTZR\", \"essentialia negotii\", \"baza klauzul KTZR\" lub gdy użytkownik wspomina o kancelarii KTZR / swojej kancelarii.",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/ktzr-polskie-umowy-gospodarcze-adam-piotrowski"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "nda-reviewer-anthropic",
"source": "./",
"description": "Screen incoming NDAs and classify them as GREEN (standard), YELLOW (needs review), or RED (significant issues). Use when a new NDA comes in from sales or business development, when assessing NDA risk level, or when deciding whether an NDA needs full counsel review.",
"version": "2026.01.30",
"author": {
"name": "Anthropic"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/nda-reviewer-anthropic"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "nda-reviewer-jamie-tso",
"source": "./",
"description": "Reviews incoming one-way (unilateral) commercial NDAs in a jurisdiction-agnostic way, from either a Recipient or Discloser perspective (user-selected), producing a clause-by-clause issue log with preferred redlines, fallbacks, rationales, owners, and deadlines.",
"version": "2025.12.30",
"author": {
"name": "Jamie Tso"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/nda-reviewer-jamie-tso"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "playbook-reviewer-anthropic",
"source": "./",
"description": "Review contracts against your organization's negotiation playbook, flagging deviations and generating redline suggestions. Use when reviewing vendor contracts, customer agreements, or any commercial agreement where you need clause-by-clause analysis against standard positions.",
"version": "2026.01.30",
"author": {
"name": "Anthropic"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/playbook-reviewer-anthropic"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "tech-contract-negotiator-patrick-munro",
"source": "./",
"description": "Guide to negotiating technology services agreements, professional services contracts, and commercial B2B transactions. Provides three-position frameworks (provider-favorable, balanced, client-favorable), deal-size tactics, objection handling templates, and concession roadmaps. Use when: (1) Developing negotiation strategies for SaaS, cloud, or managed services agreements, (2) Preparing position papers and fallback positions, (3) Responding to counterparty objections and demands, (4) Creating concession roadmaps that protect critical interests, (5) Assessing tactics based on deal value and leverage, or (6) Structuring balanced outcomes for liability, IP, payment, SLA, or warranty provisions.",
"version": "2026-04-25",
"author": {
"name": "Patrick Munro"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/tech-contract-negotiator-patrick-munro"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "tech-contract-review-parth-desai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Jurisdiction-aware review of technology and commercial contracts — MSA, DPA, SOW, LOE, NDA, SLA, EULA, IP assignment, vendor/supplier, and API/platform ToS. Classifies every clause (acceptable / negotiate / red-flag / missing), proposes redline replacements, checks governing law and data-protection obligations (GDPR, UK GDPR, India DPDP Act, CCPA), and outputs a structured risk summary. Built for tech and AI deals where training-data, IP-ownership, and liability terms need heightened scrutiny. Not a substitute for qualified legal counsel.",
"version": "2026-05-24",
"author": {
"name": "Parth Desai"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/tech-contract-review-parth-desai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "tos-clause-scanner-moonshot-ai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Audit Terms of Service, user agreements, and privacy policies for consumer risks, producing a structured report that flags unfair clauses, data traps, and liability issues. Trigger when a user asks to review, audit, or analyze a ToS, privacy policy, or user agreement, or mentions specific concerns like auto-renewal or data authorization.",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/tos-clause-scanner-moonshot-ai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "yc-saas-drafter-victor-wang",
"source": "./",
"description": "Drafts a customized SaaS Customer Agreement starting from the Y Combinator standard form SaaS template. Runs a structured intake covering fee structure, data handling, ML/AI rights, implementation services, SLA, and governing law, then applies 18 always-on professional defaults plus 12 conditional decisions. Outputs a clean .docx ready for review alongside a lawyer-facing memo that itemizes every change from the YC baseline and flags each item still requiring attorney input. Aimed at startup founders preparing first-draft customer subscription agreements.",
"version": "2026-05-12",
"author": {
"name": "Victor Wang"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Commercial Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/yc-saas-drafter-victor-wang"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "ai-audit-trail-larissa-meredith-flister",
"source": "./",
"description": "This skill builds a structured audit trail of an AI-assisted task: what the tool was asked to do, what materials it was given, what it produced, how the output was verified, and what was ultimately relied upon. It documents the workflow for supervision and later review without ruling on privilege or disclosure, so the record stays accurate rather than self-serving.",
"version": "2026-06-11",
"author": {
"name": "Larissa Meredith-Flister"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/ai-audit-trail-larissa-meredith-flister"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "ai-governance-reviewer-carl-ditzler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Conduct AI governance, legal-risk, privacy, compliance, procurement, or vendor-risk reviews of internal AI use cases, AI product features, LLM workflows, or third-party AI vendors. The skill runs a structured intake process, identifies required documentation and missing evidence, maps the use case to AI governance frameworks and applicable legal domains, and produces a governance review with scorecards, findings, owners, remediation actions, and follow-up questions.",
"version": "2026.03.16",
"author": {
"name": "Carl Ditzler"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/ai-governance-reviewer-carl-ditzler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "analyse-sanctions-et-exportations-gillan-saleh",
"source": "./",
"description": "Outil d'analyse des sanctions économiques internationales et du contrôle des exportations pour Claude Desktop. Screening individuel en temps réel sur 30+ listes officielles (ONU, UE, OFAC, OFSI, DGT France...), analyse sectorielle, biens à double usage (Reg. UE 2021/821), régimes extraterritoriaux US/Chine (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), risque USD/SWIFT et cartographie de 30+ juridictions. Résultats sourcés et vérifiés en temps réel — aucune réponse de mémoire. Répond en français, anglais, allemand, espagnol, russe et chinois. Mis à jour au 19 mai 2026 (20ème paquet UE, SEUC UK, EO Cuba). Outil indicatif — ne se substitue pas à un avis juridique.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/analyse-sanctions-et-exportations-gillan-saleh"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "argentine-supreme-court-analysis-adrian-lerer",
"source": "./",
"description": "PageRank-based jurisprudential authority analysis for Argentine case law (CSJN, federal courts). Peer-reviewed methodology published in JCLLT (DOI: 10.47852/bonviewJCLLT62027951). Ranks precedents by citation network influence with temporal decay.",
"version": "2026-05-13",
"author": {
"name": "Adrián Lerer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/argentine-supreme-court-analysis-adrian-lerer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "bacen-compliance-sentinel-rafael-mastronardi",
"source": "./",
"description": "Orientação completa sobre conformidade com regulamentações do Banco Central do Brasil: Resolução CMN nº 4.893/2021 (Política de Segurança Cibernética), Resolução BCB nº 85/2021 (GRSIC), Open Finance Brasil (Resoluções BCB nº 32/2020 e atualizações), e demais normas prudenciais do BACEN. Cobre elaboração e revisão de Política de Segurança Cibernética, Plano de Ação e Resposta a Incidentes (PARI), Gestão de Riscos de Serviços de Informação e Comunicação (GRSIC), consentimento e compartilhamento de dados no Open Finance, requisitos de API, gestão de terceiros (outsourcing) e sanções do BACEN. Triggers: Bacen, Banco Central, CMN 4.893, Resolução 4.893, segurança cibernética bancária, PARI, GRSIC, Open Finance, Open Banking, compartilhamento de dados financeiros, consentimento Open Finance, API financeira, outsourcing bancário, risco cibernético, incidente cibernético banco, LGPD financeira, fintech compliance, instituição financeira, DICT, Pix segurança.",
"version": "2026-05-20",
"author": {
"name": "Rafael Mastronardi"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/bacen-compliance-sentinel-rafael-mastronardi"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "cmmc-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert CMMC 2.0 (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) advisor for US defense contractors and subcontractors in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). Use this skill whenever a user asks about CMMC 2.0, CMMC Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3, DoD cybersecurity compliance, NIST SP 800-171, CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information) protection, System Security Plan (SSP), Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M), C3PAO assessments, DIBCAC audits, self-assessment, SPRS score, or any requirement under DFARS 252.204-7012 or 7021.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/cmmc-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "cra-vulnerability-obligations-ansvar-ai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Cited EU Cyber Resilience Act assessment for a product with digital elements: scope, product classification, role-specific vulnerability-handling duties, and Article 14 reporting - joined with live CVE / CISA-KEV / EPSS vulnerability intelligence, and a NIS2 / GDPR / DORA entity-level screen. Requires the free Ansvar Gateway MCP connector; every legal claim is fetched from official publisher text at answer time and cited, never answered from model memory.",
"version": "1.1",
"author": {
"name": "Ansvar Systems AB"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/cra-vulnerability-obligations-ansvar-ai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "cross-regulatory-impact-analyzer-patrick-munro",
"source": "./",
"description": "Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.",
"version": "2026-04-25",
"author": {
"name": "Patrick Munro"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/cross-regulatory-impact-analyzer-patrick-munro"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "ear-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Export Administration Regulations (EAR, 15 CFR Parts 730-774) compliance advisor — ECCN classification across all 10 CCL categories and 5 product groups (A-E), EAR99 determination, jurisdiction analysis (EAR vs ITAR order of review), license requirement analysis via Country Chart, all license exceptions (LVS, GBS, CIV, TMP, RPL, GOV, TSU, ENC, TSR, APP, BAG, AVS, ACE), end-user/end-use controls (Entity List, Denied Persons List, Unverified List, MEU List), deemed export rules, Foreign Direct Product Rule (FDPR), de minimis thresholds, 10 General Prohibitions, SNAP-R license applications, voluntary self-disclosure, civil/criminal penalties, Export Compliance Program (ECP) design, and EAR vs ITAR jurisdiction determination. Use for any dual-use export control, CCL classification, or BIS compliance question.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/ear-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "enforcement-action-analysis-amir-fadavi",
"source": "./",
"description": "Analyze any OFAC or OFSI enforcement action — by URL, pasted text, or uploaded document — and produce a structured root cause analysis as a formatted Excel (.xlsx) spreadsheet. Use this skill whenever a user names, links to, pastes, or uploads an OFAC or OFSI enforcement action and asks for any of the following: root cause analysis, compliance gaps, what went wrong, lessons learned, organizational self-assessment, or remediation planning. Also trigger when a user asks \"analyze this enforcement action\", \"what were the root causes\", \"turn this into a checklist\", or \"how do I make sure this doesn't happen to us\". Outputs a single-sheet .xlsx table with six columns: Root Cause | What Went Wrong | How It Went Wrong | What Could Have Stopped It | Is my organization immune to this? (Yes/No/Partial) | Notes.",
"version": "2026-06-10",
"author": {
"name": "Amir Fadavi"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/enforcement-action-analysis-amir-fadavi"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-ai-act-examination-report-generator-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Generate a formal, structured AI Act compliance assessment report suitable for legal files, audit trails, and regulatory inquiries. Supports multiple output formats: full assessment report, classification record (Prüfprotokoll), compliance register entry, and management briefing (Entscheidungsvorlage), with optional Word document export.",
"version": "2026.06.05",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-ai-act-examination-report-generator-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-ai-act-high-risk-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Depth assessment of whether an AI system is high-risk under Art. 6 of the EU AI Act, grounded in the Commission's draft Art. 6(5) classification guidelines (general principles + Annex I + Annex III). Covers the Annex I product-safety route, all eight Annex III areas with worked examples, the Art. 6(3) exception and its profiling re-exception, and the Art. 25 quasi-provider trap. Outputs a structured decision block, a practitioner memo, and a JSON interchange artefact.",
"version": "2026-06-09",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-ai-act-high-risk-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-ai-act-high-risk-implementation-readiness-werner-plutat",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assess and operationalize implementation readiness for high-risk AI systems under the EU AI Act Annex III, including provider and deployer obligations, conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, and EU database registration. Use when users say things like “we classified this as high-risk, what now?”, “build an EU AI Act readiness plan”, “assess our Annex III compliance gaps”, “what do providers/deployers of high-risk AI need to implement?”, “prepare for conformity assessment”, or “create a high-risk AI implementation roadmap.”",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-ai-act-high-risk-implementation-readiness-werner-plutat"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-ai-act-knowledge-base-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents, including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification. Answers any EU AI Act question with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, and sector-specific guidance — covering penalties, timelines, GPAI obligations, high-risk and prohibited practices, and the AI Act / GDPR interplay.",
"version": "2026.06.21",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-ai-act-knowledge-base-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-ai-act-obligations-mapper-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Map the full set of legal obligations based on role and risk tier under the EU AI Act, producing an actionable compliance matrix with RACI assignments, implementation priorities, GDPR cross-references, and a phased implementation roadmap.",
"version": "2026.06.05",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-ai-act-obligations-mapper-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-ai-act-quick-assessment-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Fast 15-25 minute triage for preliminary AI Act classification and compliance assessment. Produces a preliminary output with risk tier, role, top obligations, compliance timeline, and jurisdiction flags, then routes to detailed skills for full analysis.",
"version": "2026.06.05",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-ai-act-quick-assessment-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-ai-act-role-determination-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Determine the organization's role under the EU AI Act — provider (Anbieter), deployer (Betreiber), importer, distributor, or quasi-provider — and assess Art. 25 quasi-provider risk from substantial modifications, rebranding, or changed intended purpose.",
"version": "2026.06.05",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-ai-act-role-determination-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-ai-act-system-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Determine whether a technology qualifies as an AI system under Art. 3(1) and classify its risk tier (prohibited, high-risk, GPAI with systemic risk, limited risk, minimal risk). Covers scope exclusions (Art. 2), AI system definition test (7 criteria), prohibited practice screening (Art. 5), high-risk assessment (Annex I + III with Art. 6(3) exception), GPAI check, and Art. 50 transparency triggers.",
"version": "2026.06.05",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-ai-act-system-classifier-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-ai-act-system-classifier-werner-plutat",
"source": "./",
"description": "Classify an AI system under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and map the compliance obligations that follow. Walks Art. 2 scope exclusions, Art. 3(1) AI system definition (7-criteria test), Art. 5 prohibited practice screening, Annex I and Annex III high-risk assessment with the Art. 6(3) narrow procedural exception, Art. 51-56 GPAI with the 10^25 FLOP systemic risk threshold, and Art. 50 transparency triggers. Built for in-house counsel classifying real systems: medical imaging, medical devices, credit scoring, insurance pricing, HR or CV screening, biometric identification, emotion recognition, deepfake or synthetic content, content moderation, fraud detection, generative AI or foundation model deployments. DACH routing for Betriebsrat consultation, BaFin, BSI, BNetzA, BfDI. Pairs with the EU AI Act High-Risk Implementation Readiness, FRIA, GPAI Code of Practice, and Serious Incident Reporting skills for downstream workflow.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-ai-act-system-classifier-werner-plutat"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-ai-act-transparency-assessor-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assesses which of the Art. 50(1)-(5) transparency obligations of the EU AI Act apply to a given AI system's provider or deployer, grounded in the final Code of Practice on Transparency of AI-Generated Content (June 2026) and the Commission's draft Art. 50 Guidelines. Covers AI-chatbot disclosure, deepfake and synthetic-content marking/watermarking, emotion-recognition and biometric-categorisation notices, the machine-readable marking duty, the obviousness exceptions, and the implementation timeline. Outputs a formal mini-report plus a per-obligation compliance checklist with gap flags. For breadth-first tier triage use the EU AI Act System Classifier; for raw Art. 50 text and Q&A use the EU AI Act Knowledge Base; for the full role x tier matrix use the EU AI Act Obligations Mapper.",
"version": "2026-07-05",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-ai-act-transparency-assessor-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-data-act-compliance-assessment-werner-plutat",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assess compliance obligations under the EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854) for connected products, IoT devices, data sharing, cloud switching, B2B fairness, B2G data access, dispute resolution, and international data transfers. Covers scope assessment (manufacturer, data holder, data recipient roles), user data access rights, pre-sale transparency, unfair contract terms, public authority data requests, cloud portability, dispute settlement mechanisms, international transfer restrictions, access-by-design obligations, trade secret protection, and cross-regulation mapping with GDPR, AI Act, and CRA. Use when assessing Data Act obligations, designing connected products, drafting data sharing contracts, responding to B2G requests, planning cloud switching capabilities, or evaluating dispute resolution options.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-data-act-compliance-assessment-werner-plutat"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-data-act-ryan-malek",
"source": "./",
"description": "A working tool for lawyers advising on the EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854). Hand it the facts of a matter and it returns a classification memo, a drafting starter, a verbatim regulation lookup, an applied legal analysis, or a gap audit. Every output quotes verbatim from the bundled regulation and the European Commission's FAQ rather than paraphrasing from memory. Sixteen drafting templates cover what lawyers actually draft against: Art. 3(2) and 3(3) pre-contract notices, Art. 25 data-processing-service clauses, Art. 26, 28, and 29 public pages, the three-part trade-secret refusal pack, a safety and security restriction clause, and a third-party data-sharing request. Output goes to chat by default. A one-click Word export styled for client work is available after the chat answer, with a verified-as-of stamp and live EUR-Lex and FAQ links so currency is always visible on the page.",
"version": "2026-05-12",
"author": {
"name": "Ryan Malek"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-data-act-ryan-malek"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "fundamental-rights-impact-assessment-eu-ai-act-art-27-werner-plutat",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assess whether a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is required under Article 27 EU AI Act, and structure or draft that assessment for a specific high-risk AI deployment. Covers deployer scope gating (public bodies and private entities providing public services), affected group mapping, Charter rights analysis, proportionality, safeguards evaluation, residual risk, DPIA/FRIA interaction, notification under Article 27(3), and DACH-specific considerations. Use when asked about FRIA obligations, Article 27 scope, fundamental rights and AI, or deployer assessment duties.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/fundamental-rights-impact-assessment-eu-ai-act-art-27-werner-plutat"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "gpai-code-of-practice-compliance-werner-plutat",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), Articles 51-56. Covers GPAI model identification (Art. 3(63)), systemic risk model designation (Art. 3(65), Art. 51, 10^25 FLOP training compute threshold), upstream provider obligations under Art. 53 (transparency, technical documentation, copyright policy, training data summary), additional systemic risk obligations under Art. 55 (model evaluation, adversarial testing, AI Office incident notification, cybersecurity), systemic-risk notification and Commission designation under Art. 52, downstream Art. 25 quasi-provider duties, and Art. 53(2) open-source exemption. Built for in-house counsel and AI governance teams reviewing LLM or foundation model deployments, drafting GPAI compliance plans, or assessing systemic risk thresholds. DACH: BaFin, BSI, BNetzA. Pairs with the EU AI Act System Classifier, High-Risk Readiness, FRIA, and Serious Incident Reporting skills.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/gpai-code-of-practice-compliance-werner-plutat"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "incident-reporting-navigator-ansvar-ai",
"source": "./",
"description": "One security incident can trigger several EU reporting regimes at once. This skill screens NIS2, GDPR, DORA, and the Cyber Resilience Act for each involved legal entity, applies the served trigger tests, checks each duty was actually in force for the incident, resolves the receiving authority per regime and member state from served national law (e.g. Dutch and German transpositions), and produces a deadline table in which every duty, authority, and deadline is quoted and cited from official publisher text. Requires the free Ansvar Gateway MCP connector; never answers from model memory - a connector failure is never converted into \"no duty exists\".",
"version": "1.1",
"author": {
"name": "Ansvar Systems AB"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/incident-reporting-navigator-ansvar-ai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "iso27001-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert ISO 27001 compliance assistant for security and compliance teams. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO 27001 or ISO/IEC 27001, including any of the following: gap analysis, auditing, compliance assessments, control checklists, policy writing, document generation, Statement of Applicability (SoA), risk assessment, risk registers, risk treatment plans, Annex A controls, ISMS implementation, clause requirements, certification readiness, transitioning from 2013 to 2022, control implementation guidance, incident response policies, access control policies, supplier security, or any information security management system (ISMS) topic.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/iso27001-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "itar-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert ITAR compliance advisor for US defense contractors, exporters, and manufacturers. Use this skill for any question about 22 CFR Parts 120-130, the United States Munitions List (USML), DDTC registration, export license applications (DSP-5/73/94), Technical Assistance Agreements (TAA), Manufacturing License Agreements (MLA), brokering regulations (Part 129), deemed export rules for foreign nationals, technology control plans, voluntary disclosures, violation mitigation, jurisdiction determination (ITAR vs EAR), or US Munitions List category scoping.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/itar-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-risk-assessment-moonshot-ai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-risk-assessment-moonshot-ai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-risk-assessment-zacharie-laik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.",
"version": "2026.02.25",
"author": {
"name": "Zacharie Laïk"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-risk-assessment-zacharie-laik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-risk-assessor-anthropic",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.",
"version": "2026.01.30",
"author": {
"name": "Anthropic"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-risk-assessor-anthropic"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "monitor-prawa-ue-i-polskiego-grzegorz-skuza",
"source": "./",
"description": "Wyszukiwanie, pobieranie i analiza aktów prawnych UE oraz polskich aktów i projektów wdrażających regulacje UE (np. PPWR, CBAM, EUDR, ESPR, CSRD, CSDDD, GPSR, AI Act, baterie, ekoprojekt). Używaj, gdy użytkownik potrzebuje statusu prawnego, dat stosowania, przepisów przejściowych, relacji aktów, obowiązków compliance i raportu z podstawami prawnymi oraz źródłami urzędowymi.",
"version": "2026-07-12",
"author": {
"name": "Grzegorz Skuza"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/monitor-prawa-ue-i-polskiego-grzegorz-skuza"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "morocco-ecommerce-compliance-audit-omar-laftouh",
"source": "./",
"description": "Performs a legal compliance audit for a Moroccan e-commerce website, focused on personal data protection (Law 09-08) and consumer contract disclosures/obligations (Law 31-08). Use this skill when a user asks to audit, check, or assess the legal compliance of an e-commerce website operating in Morocco — presence and validity of Terms & Conditions, privacy policy, CNDP declaration, mandatory disclosures, right of withdrawal, consent banner. Out of scope: compliance for other countries, Meta/Google advertising compliance (covered by another skill), definitive legal advice (results are a starting point for professional review, not legal advice).",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/morocco-ecommerce-compliance-audit-omar-laftouh"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "new-sanctions-designation-screening-test-amir-fadavi",
"source": "./",
"description": "Generate a spreadsheet of test entries — newly designated names from OFAC, OFSI, and EU sanctions lists plus deliberate variations of those names — to validate that a sanctions screening system catches fresh designations and is tuned to the right fuzziness threshold. Use this whenever the user asks for sanctions list update test data, screening regression test data, screening QA, fuzzy match calibration, or wants to verify their screening lists are current. Trigger even if the user doesn't say 'screening' explicitly — phrases like 'test my sanctions list', 'check our SDN coverage', 'is my list up to date', or 'build me a regression set from the latest designations' should also invoke this skill.",
"version": "2026-05-07",
"author": {
"name": "Amir Fadavi"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/new-sanctions-designation-screening-test-amir-fadavi"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "nis2-navigator-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Structured NIS2 compliance assessment covering scope classification (Annex I/II, size thresholds, DORA/CIR checks), gap analysis across all 10 Art. 21 risk management measures with 0–4 maturity scoring and ISO 27001 references, and a prioritized compliance roadmap. Deep German BSIG-neu coverage (BSI registration, § 30/32/38, incident reporting, Nachweispflicht) plus high-level jurisdiction profiles for Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, and Spain. Built on ENISA guidance and BSI #nis2know packages.",
"version": "2026-06-05",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/nis2-navigator-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "nist-ai-rmf-rafal-fryc",
"source": "./",
"description": "This skill helps you apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and can quote AI RMF subcategories and GenAI profile action IDs verbatim from NIST AI 100-1 and 600-1. The skill routes you to the correct category as needed and has three modes, picked automatically from your question: 1. Consult: “What should I do per the AI RMF for this system?” 2. Governance Plan: “What should our AI governance program include?” 3. Assessment: “Run a full AI RMF aligned impact assessment for this system.” It knows the difference between the Core and the GenAI overlay, and won’t dump profile actions on a classifier or recommender.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/nist-ai-rmf-rafal-fryc"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "privacy-policy-stephane-boghossian",
"source": "./",
"description": "A zero-hallucination privacy-policy generator that takes anyone — non-lawyer founder to lawyer — from a guided intake to a publishable, jurisdiction-aware privacy policy. Jurisdiction-first: it detects which laws apply from where your users are, then drafts only the required clauses — GDPR/EU + UK, US (CCPA/CPRA, ~20 state laws, COPPA, sector overlays), and global/MENA (LGPD, Quebec Law 25, India DPDP, China PIPL, UAE/DIFC, Saudi PDPL), plus app-store, cookies, and AI/EU AI Act disclosures. Its rule: state only what you confirm; never invent a statute, citation, fine, or date — every claim is source-cited and QA-gated. Not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-30",
"author": {
"name": "Stephane Boghossian"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/privacy-policy-stephane-boghossian"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "privilege-sentinel-emily-cabrera",
"source": "./",
"description": "Pre-flight privilege and work-product check for legal AI prompts. Use when the user is about to send legal content to a third-party AI surface and wants to know whether the prompt risks blowing attorney-client privilege or work-product protection. Returns a SAFE/CAUTION/STOP band with cited factors, a discovery-impact line, and a redacted-safe rewrite.",
"version": "2026-05-07",
"author": {
"name": "Emily Cabrera"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/privilege-sentinel-emily-cabrera"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "regulatory-audit-generator-moonshot-ai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Builds compliance checklists for business scenarios involving GDPR, PIPL, or advertising/data laws. Outputs a structured checklist with check items, legal basis, risk levels, and actionable recommendations. Triggered by requests like \\\"run a compliance check,\\\" \\\"GDPR/PIPL compliance,\\\" \\\"pre-launch review,\\\" \\\"privacy impact assessment (PIA/DPIA),\\\" or asking if a feature is compliant.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/regulatory-audit-generator-moonshot-ai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "regulatory-deal-card-generator-patrick-munro",
"source": "./",
"description": "Generates standalone interactive HTML \"deal cards\" that translate complex regulations into negotiation-ready reference tools, systematically distinguishing mandatory obligations from negotiable implementation choices. Use when the user needs an interactive regulatory guide for (1) contract negotiation support, (2) client education or internal training, (3) regulatory briefings for commercial stakeholders, or (4) structured comparison between required and flexible compliance paths. Primary focus on EU digital regulation (Data Act, AI Act, CRA, DORA, NIS2, GDPR) but the structural pattern transfers to any regulation where separating hard obligations from implementation choice is the point. Supports bilingual output where the jurisdiction calls for it.",
"version": "2026-04-25",
"author": {
"name": "Patrick Munro"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/regulatory-deal-card-generator-patrick-munro"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "regulatory-threat-model-ansvar-ai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Runs a server-enforced STRIDE threat model and LINDDUN privacy threat model over a system described in prose, screens named dependencies against live CVE/KEV/EPSS data, and builds a cited screen of which EU security obligations (GDPR, NIS2, CRA, AI Act) may apply and which need determination - every regulatory statement fetched from officially published text through the Ansvar Gateway connector at answer time, with scope, role, and application-date limits stated. Never answered from model memory; never a compliance verdict.",
"version": "1.2",
"author": {
"name": "Ansvar Systems AB"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/regulatory-threat-model-ansvar-ai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "sanctions-and-export-analysis-gillan-saleh",
"source": "./",
"description": "Real-time individual screening across 30+ official lists (UN, EU, OFAC, OFSI, French DGT...), sectoral analysis, dual-use goods (EU Reg. 2021/821), US/China extraterritorial regimes (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), USD/SWIFT risk and jurisdictional mapping across 30+ countries.",
"version": "2026-05-21",
"author": {
"name": "Gillan Saleh"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/sanctions-and-export-analysis-gillan-saleh"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "sanctions-screening-matei-clej",
"source": "./",
"description": "Screen a client, counterparty, payer or corporate against the sanctions lists published by the designating authorities themselves — the UK Sanctions List (FCDO), OFSI, the UN Security Council, the EU consolidated list and OFAC's SDN and non-SDN lists. Use when onboarding, before taking a payment, before completing a transaction, or whenever a name must be checked against sanctions. Produces candidates and provenance, never a clearance: the record names every list searched with its publication date and count, states what was NOT searched, and ends at a blank decision block. Fails closed — a cache that is missing, damaged, truncated or stale is reported NOT SEARCHED and the process exits non-zero, so nothing can read an incomplete run as clean. Matches across transliteration, diacritics, homoglyphs and initials, because nobody spells a name the way the publisher does. Standard library only; screening opens no network connection.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/sanctions-screening-matei-clej"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "screening-alert-adjudication-amir-fadavi",
"source": "./",
"description": "Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — \"is this person actually on the sanctions list\", \"did we get a real match\", \"clear this alert\", \"I have a hit on X\" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.",
"version": "2026-05-19",
"author": {
"name": "Amir Fadavi"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/screening-alert-adjudication-amir-fadavi"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "serious-incident-reporting-eu-ai-act-art-73-werner-plutat",
"source": "./",
"description": "Serious Incident Reporting (SIR) for high-risk AI systems under Article 73 EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Assess, qualify, draft, and submit Art. 73 SIR notifications across the four Art. 3(49) harm categories (death or serious health damage, critical infrastructure disruption, breach of fundamental rights, property or environmental damage). Covers Art. 73 immediate, 2/10/15-day reporting windows, market surveillance authority notification, deployer duties under Art. 26(5), and cross-regulation mapping with GDPR Art. 33/34 breach notification, NIS2 Art. 23 incident reporting, DORA Art. 19 ICT incident, and MDR vigilance. Built for in-house counsel and AI risk teams handling AI incidents, building AI incident response playbooks, or managing AI failure, AI bias, or automated decision incidents. DACH routing through German market surveillance (BNetzA, BaFin, BSI, BfArM, KBA). Pairs with the EU AI Act System Classifier, High-Risk Readiness, FRIA, and GPAI Code of Practice skills.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/serious-incident-reporting-eu-ai-act-art-73-werner-plutat"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "soc2-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/soc2-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "statute-briefer-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Briefs statutes and legislative Acts using the MAPS + RULES framework: a system-level map of the whole Act (citation and text status, purpose, structure, scope, definitions) plus operational rule-modules for each operative provision (elements, legal effect, exceptions, procedure, consequences, forum, interaction rules). Works from statutory text supplied by the user and never invents statutory language. Use when briefing a statute, analyzing legislative text, mapping statutory architecture, extracting the elements of a provision, or applying a statute to facts. Triggers on \"brief this statute\", \"analyze this Act\", \"map the statute\", \"apply [statute] to [scenario]\", \"what are the elements of [provision]\", \"statutory analysis\", and on references to codified sections such as 42 U.S.C. or the Texas Health and Safety Code. Two modes: (A) text-only briefing for structural analysis, and (B) scenario-driven briefing that applies provisions to specific facts with verbatim quotation and pinpoint cites.",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/statute-briefer-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "vendor-due-diligence-patrick-munro",
"source": "./",
"description": "Framework for assessing IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners. Creates structured risk assessments across financial, operational, compliance, security, and reputational dimensions with regulatory checklists (GDPR, DORA, NIS2, SOX). Use when: (1) Evaluating new vendors or technology providers, (2) Conducting third-party risk assessments for procurement, (3) Performing critical vendor due diligence for regulatory compliance, (4) Creating vendor onboarding documentation, (5) Establishing ongoing vendor monitoring processes, (6) Assessing vendor concentration risk, or (7) Generating executive-level vendor risk reports.",
"version": "2026-04-25",
"author": {
"name": "Patrick Munro"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/vendor-due-diligence-patrick-munro"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "whistleblower-policy-advisor-malik-taiar",
"source": "./",
"description": "Guide for (a) auditing an existing whistleblower system or (b) drafting a compliant reporting policy from a provided template. Covers EU Directive 2019/1937, the amended Sapin II law (Waserman 2022), Decree 2022-1284, CNIL guidelines, public sector requirements, and duty of vigilance.",
"version": "2026-04-26",
"author": {
"name": "Malik Taiar"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Compliance",
"skills": [
"./skills/whistleblower-policy-advisor-malik-taiar"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "assignation-refere-communication-associe-selim-brihi",
"source": "./",
"description": "Rédaction d'assignations en référé pour obtenir la communication forcée de documents sociaux à un associé sur le fondement de l'article L. 238-1 du code de commerce. À utiliser quand un associé se voit refuser l'accès aux comptes annuels, rapports de gestion ou PV d'assemblées.",
"version": "2026.01.23",
"author": {
"name": "Sélim Brihi"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Corporate Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/assignation-refere-communication-associe-selim-brihi"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "contract-review-kevin-lordy",
"source": "./",
"description": "Review legal contracts, NDAs, employment agreements, SaaS terms, and M&A documents. Identifies unfavorable terms, suggests redlines, and compares to market standards. Use for contract analysis, due diligence, or negotiation prep.",
"category": "Corporate Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/contract-review-kevin-lordy"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "gouvernance-societes-cotees-gillan-saleh",
"source": "./",
"description": "Skill open source d'analyse documentaire à vocation scientifique sur la gouvernance des sociétés cotées françaises (SBF 120). Il agrège, sous forme d'index sourcés à la page près, le corpus réglementaire et doctrinal 2020-2025 — rapports AMF et HCGE, Code AFEP-MEDEF, doctrine AMF, priorités ESMA, rapport sénatorial Rietmann/Gay, guide Paris Europlace — complété par recherche web. Sa règle fondatrice est le zéro invention : chaque chiffre, citation et page provient d'une source vérifiée, mot pour mot, en distinguant strictement le régulateur (AMF, ESMA) de la soft law (HCGE, AFEP-MEDEF). Quatre usages : restitution sourcée, analyse longitudinale, audit d'émetteur sur une grille de 13 blocs, croisement thématique multi-émetteurs. Ni conseil juridique, ni conseil en investissement.",
"version": "2026-06-23",
"author": {
"name": "Gillan Saleh"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Corporate Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/gouvernance-societes-cotees-gillan-saleh"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "icelandic-company-formation-magnus-smarason",
"source": "./",
"description": "Use this skill when asked about forming, registering, or structuring a company in Iceland. Triggers on questions about Icelandic business entities (ehf, hf, sf, svf, ses), capital requirements, registration with Fyrirtækjaskrá, governance structures, or choosing the right entity type.",
"version": "2026-04-11",
"author": {
"name": "Magnus Smári Smárason"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Corporate Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/icelandic-company-formation-magnus-smarason"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "indian-foreign-investment-approval-assessment-siddhi-kudalkar",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assess whether Government of India approval is required for foreign investment in an Indian company under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and the Non-Debt Instruments Rules, 2019. The skill systematically gathers transaction details, evaluates sectoral entry routes and caps, assesses land border country restrictions under applicable laws, and delivers a preliminary compliance note. Produces clear guidance on whether the investment falls within Automatic Route or requires Government approval.",
"version": "2026-05-25",
"author": {
"name": "Siddhi Kudalkar"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Corporate Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/indian-foreign-investment-approval-assessment-siddhi-kudalkar"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "extradition-case-law-search-matei-clej",
"source": "./",
"description": "Searches the domestic courts of 122 jurisdictions — 153 databases, 49 automated — for extradition and arrest-warrant surrender decisions, each in its own language and vocabulary. Answers the question no commercial database does: how are OTHER executing states treating this requesting state, or this ground? Searching by requesting state localises its name per jurisdiction (AE becomes 'Emiratele Arabe Unite' in Romania, 'Emirati Arabi Uniti' in Italy), so the sweep finds what those courts actually wrote. Every hit passes a relevance gate; every search leaves a dated report, so the research is reconstructable months later. Use when asked what foreign courts have said about surrender to a given state, whether any European court has refused extradition on prison conditions, assurances or Article 3, for comparative extradition research, or to build a foreign-authority section of an extradition argument. Not for domestic case law of the user's own jurisdiction, and never a substitute for reading the judgment.",
"category": "Criminal Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/extradition-case-law-search-matei-clej"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "analyse-rgpd-de-dpa-fournisseur-hugo-salard",
"source": "./",
"description": "Analyse systématique d'un Data Processing Agreement (DPA) au regard de l'article 28 RGPD, des lignes directrices EDPB 07/2020 et 02/2024, des Clauses Contractuelles Types 2021 et du Règlement (UE) 2024/1689. Produit un rapport structuré clause par clause sur 18 critères (13 obligatoires + 5 complémentaires) avec diagnostic 🟢/🟡/🔴, analyse détaillée des transferts internationaux (tableau structuré + accès gouvernemental Cloud Act/FISA 702), vérification de l'utilisation de systèmes d'IA, remédiations contractuelles prêtes à insérer, et questions à poser au fournisseur. Pensé pour les DPO et praticiens RGPD qui négocient ou auditent des contrats de sous-traitance.",
"version": "2026-05-05",
"author": {
"name": "Hugo Salard"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/analyse-rgpd-de-dpa-fournisseur-hugo-salard"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "audit-conformite-rgpd-site-internet-hugo-salard",
"source": "./",
"description": "Audit de conformité RGPD d'un site internet par un praticien RGPD/DPO. Observation systématique selon une checklist en 10 sections (mentions légales, hébergeur, formulaires, newsletter, politique de confidentialité, cookies, mots de passe, trackers, sous-traitants et transferts hors UE, accessibilité des droits) plus annexe 22 items art. 13/14 RGPD. Produit un rapport structuré (markdown, .docx en option) avec niveau de conformité global, points bloquants, points de vigilance, recommandations prioritaires et sources réglementaires citées (LCEN, RGPD, ePrivacy, délibérations CNIL, EDPB, DPF). Tool-agnostique : navigation automatique ou mode dégradé copier-coller. 7 arbres de décision pour les cas limites. Le praticien valide tous les statuts avant transmission au client. Analyse technique uniquement, pas de conseil juridique.",
"version": "2026-05-05",
"author": {
"name": "Hugo Salard"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/audit-conformite-rgpd-site-internet-hugo-salard"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "ccpa-cpra-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance advisor — business threshold analysis, consumer rights fulfillment (access, delete, correct, opt-out of sale/sharing, limit SPI, ADMT opt-out), privacy notice drafting, service provider vs. contractor vs. third-party classification, sensitive personal information (SPI) handling, data minimization, opt-out mechanisms (including GPC), cybersecurity audits and risk assessments (live since Jan 1, 2026), ADMT obligations (effective 2026, deadline Jan 1, 2027), CPPA enforcement (Disney $2.75M, PlayOn $1.1M, Ford $375K), penalty exposure, GDPR comparison, and gap assessments for businesses operating in or targeting California residents.",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/ccpa-cpra-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "cookie-policy-generator-malik-taiar",
"source": "./",
"description": "Guide for drafting cookie policies compliant with GDPR and the ePrivacy Directive. Includes CNIL 2020 recommendations, a reference template, and best practices. Use when drafting or revising a cookie policy for a website or application.",
"version": "2025.12.24",
"author": {
"name": "Malik Taiar"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/cookie-policy-generator-malik-taiar"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "data-processing-agreement-art-28-gdpr-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Review, draft, or redline a Data Processing Agreement (DPA / Auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag / AVV) under Art. 28 GDPR, or prepare a Joint Controller Arrangement under Art. 26 GDPR (basic). Supports bilingual output (DE/EN), both controller- and processor-side perspectives, and two review depths — quick (Art. 28(3)(a)–(h) coverage) and negotiation-grade (clause-by-clause risk scoring).",
"version": "2026-06-09",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/data-processing-agreement-art-28-gdpr-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "dpdpa-gdpr-compliance-review-parth-desai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Performs structured compliance review, clause redlining, and drafting suggestions for legal documents (privacy policies, data processing agreements, vendor and SaaS contracts) against India's DPDPA 2023 and the EU GDPR. Flags clauses as compliant, at-risk, or non-compliant with reasoning, and proposes ready-to-use model replacement language.",
"version": "2026-05-20",
"author": {
"name": "Parth Desai"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/dpdpa-gdpr-compliance-review-parth-desai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "dpdpa-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert India Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about the DPDPA, DPDP Act, DPDP Rules 2025, India data privacy law, Data Fiduciary obligations, Data Principal rights, Significant Data Fiduciary, Data Protection Board of India, consent under DPDPA, notice requirements, breach notification India, children's data India, cross-border data transfer India, India privacy compliance, DPDPA gap analysis, DPDPA vs GDPR, or any obligation under India's personal data protection framework.",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/dpdpa-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "dpia-sentinel-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) guidance under Article 35 GDPR, EDPB Guidelines WP 248 rev.01, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI), and national SA blacklists/whitelists. Covers threshold assessment, multi-jurisdictional blacklist checks (DE, FR, IE, BE, NL, IT, PL), 5x5 risk scoring, necessity/proportionality analysis, mitigation mapping, Art. 36 prior consultation, AI dual-phase analysis, and audit-ready .docx generation.",
"version": "2026.06.05",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/dpia-sentinel-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "gdpr-breach-sentinel-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Incident response and legal compliance guidance for data breaches under GDPR Articles 33 & 34. Covers breach risk assessment using ENISA severity methodology, Controller vs Processor obligations, 72-hour notification clock management, EDPB case matching, cross-border Lead SA determination, AI Act Art. 73 intersection, mitigation playbooks, and audit-ready .docx document generation.",
"version": "2026.06.11",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/gdpr-breach-sentinel-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "gdpr-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and (4) reviewing data flows and PII handling practices. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR, data protection, privacy compliance, lawful basis, data subject rights, DPA, privacy notices, consent management, data breaches, DPIAs, controller/ processor relationships, cross-border data transfers, or any EU/UK data privacy topic.",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/gdpr-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "icelandic-privacy-review-magnus-smarason",
"source": "./",
"description": "Use this skill when asked to review data protection or privacy compliance under Icelandic law and GDPR. Triggers on requests involving personal data processing, privacy policies, DPIA assessments, kennitala handling, Persónuvernd filings, or cross-border data transfers from Iceland.",
"version": "2026-04-13",
"author": {
"name": "Magnus Smári Smárason"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/icelandic-privacy-review-magnus-smarason"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "indian-dpdp-act-consent-notice-siddhi-kudalkar",
"source": "./",
"description": "Draft or review a DPDPA-compliant consent notice under India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025. Provide basic details about your business and this skill handles the rest - building a notice tailored to your operations, with all required sections, granular consent boxes, and internal notes for your team. If you have an existing notice or privacy policy that needs to comply with DPDPA, this skill revises it too, flagging key gaps and changes made.",
"version": "2026-06-02",
"author": {
"name": "Siddhi Kudalkar"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/indian-dpdp-act-consent-notice-siddhi-kudalkar"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "iso27701-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert ISO 27701 Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 27701:2025, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, privacy information management, PIMS certification, PII controller or processor obligations, privacy risk assessment, Statement of Applicability for privacy, privacy by design, data subject rights, DPIA, records of processing activities, transitioning from ISO 27701:2019, GDPR alignment with ISO 27701, or any privacy management system topic. Also trigger for questions about Annex A.1 (controller controls), A.2 (processor controls), A.3 (shared security controls), or implementing a standalone PIMS without ISO 27001. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full ISO 27701 lifecycle from gap assessment through certification.",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/iso27701-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legitimate-interest-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Conducts a structured Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) under Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the full EDPB three-step test — interest identification, strict necessity analysis, and the balancing test with mitigation. Built on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), CNIL guidance (June 2025), ICO/DUA Act 2025, key CJEU judgments, and DPA positions from DE/FR/NL/AT/IT/ES/UK. Includes specialised modules for AI/ML, marketing, fraud prevention, children's data, employee monitoring, ePrivacy overlap, and cross-border, plus a dedicated Right to Object (Art. 21) response mode and structured LIA output. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR Art. 6(1)(f), legitimate interest, the LIA or three-step test, EDPB/DPA guidance, AI training data lawfulness, web scraping legality, direct marketing or fraud prevention legal basis, employee monitoring, the right to object, or asks for a balancing test — even if they don't say \"LIA\" explicitly.",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/legitimate-interest-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "lgpd-sentinel-rafael-mastronardi",
"source": "./",
"description": "Orientação LGPD para operações de tratamento no Brasil. Cobre bases legais (Art. 7º e Art. 11), RIPD, incidentes (Arts. 48-49), direitos dos titulares (Art. 18) e transferências internacionais. Triggers: LGPD, RIPD, ANPD, proteção de dados, dados pessoais, consentimento, encarregado, DPO Brasil, incidente de dados, legítimo interesse.",
"version": "2026-05-20",
"author": {
"name": "Rafael Mastronardi"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/lgpd-sentinel-rafael-mastronardi"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "lgpd-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert LGPD compliance advisor for Brazil's Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados (Law 13,709/2018). Use this skill whenever a user asks about LGPD, Brazilian data protection, ANPD, personal data processing in Brazil, data subject rights under Brazilian law, legal bases for processing, sensitive data handling, DPO appointment in Brazil, data breach notification to ANPD, LGPD penalties (fines up to 2% of revenue / R$50M), international data transfers from Brazil, Brazil-EU mutual adequacy (January 2026 — SCCs/BCRs no longer needed for Brazil-EU transfers), LGPD gap assessments, privacy policy drafting for Brazilian operations, DPIA under LGPD, consent management, or comparing LGPD with GDPR. Trigger for any Brazil privacy or data protection question even if LGPD is not named explicitly.",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/lgpd-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "privacy-compliance-advisor-anthropic",
"source": "./",
"description": "Navigate privacy regulations (GDPR, CCPA), review DPAs, and handle data subject requests. Use when reviewing data processing agreements, responding to data subject access or deletion requests, assessing cross-border data transfer requirements, or evaluating privacy compliance.",
"version": "2026.01.30",
"author": {
"name": "Anthropic"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/privacy-compliance-advisor-anthropic"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "privacy-notice-generator-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Draft GDPR-compliant privacy notices as .docx for any EU/EEA jurisdiction and audience. Supports five notice types (Website/App, Applicant, Employee, Business Partner, B2C Customer) across DE, FR, AT, IT, ES, NL, BE, IE, and UK GDPR. Covers Art. 13/14 disclosures, AI Act transparency, cookie policies, multi-language support, DPIA indicators, and post-generation compliance checklists.",
"version": "2026.06.05",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/privacy-notice-generator-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "privacy-policy-generator-malik-taiar",
"source": "./",
"description": "Guide for drafting privacy policies compliant with GDPR. Includes CNIL 2020 recommendations, a reference template, and best practices. Use when drafting or revising a privacy policy for a website or application.",
"version": "2025.12.24",
"author": {
"name": "Malik Taiar"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/privacy-policy-generator-malik-taiar"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "transfer-impact-assessment-tia-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "GDPR Transfer Impact Assessment for Chapter V transfers under the EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology, the CNIL TIA Guide (January 2025), and EDPB essential guarantees. Handles transfer qualification, Art. 45 adequacy fast-tracks, Art. 46 full assessments with country profiles for 12 jurisdictions, and balanced Art. 49 derogation analysis. Outputs a Markdown report, a .docx formal TIA, and a JSON delta for RoPA interchange.",
"version": "2026-06-09",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/transfer-impact-assessment-tia-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "vn-pdpl-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert Vietnam Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) compliance advisor for Law No. 91/2025/QH15 and implementing Decree 356/2025/ND-CP (effective January 1, 2026). Use this skill for gap analysis against the Vietnam PDPL, data subject rights fulfilment workflows, cross-border data transfer impact assessments, privacy notices and internal policies, breach notification procedures, sector-specific obligations (finance, AI, cloud, blockchain), and DPO qualification reviews. Trigger whenever a user mentions Vietnam data privacy, VN-PDPL, Nghị định 356, Vietnamese personal data, or cross-border transfers involving Vietnamese citizens' data.",
"category": "Data Protection",
"skills": [
"./skills/vn-pdpl-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "icelandic-labour-law-magnus-smarason",
"source": "./",
"description": "Use this skill when asked about Icelandic employment law, labour relations, workplace rights, or collective agreements. Triggers on questions about hiring, termination, working conditions, parental leave, trade unions, collective bargaining, workplace safety, or the Félagsdómur labour court in Iceland.",
"version": "2026-04-11",
"author": {
"name": "Magnus Smári Smárason"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Employment Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/icelandic-labour-law-magnus-smarason"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "notification-licenciement-selim-brihi",
"source": "./",
"description": "Guide pour la rédaction de notifications de licenciement conformes au droit du travail français. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger, préparer, créer ou éditer une lettre de notification de licenciement, notamment pour faute grave, faute lourde ou motif personnel. Le skill guide la collecte d'informations précises et la rédaction d'une notification juridiquement solide avec tous les éléments obligatoires du droit français.",
"version": "2026.01.16",
"author": {
"name": "Sélim Brihi"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Employment Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/notification-licenciement-selim-brihi"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "settlement-agreement-review-andrew-bird",
"source": "./",
"description": "Reviews or drafts the agreement that pays an employee to settle their claims — and flags the statutory conditions that decide whether it actually binds them. Works under s.203 ERA 1996 for England & Wales. Flags apparent s.203 condition gaps for a solicitor to confirm (writing, specific complaints, independent adviser, identification, insurance, statement of conditions), drafts the substantive terms (sum, tax characterisation, confidentiality, references, restrictive covenants, indemnities), and surfaces enforceability risks. Does not rule on validity and is not legal advice. Use when the user says 'review this settlement agreement', 'draft a settlement agreement', 'compromise agreement' (old term), or asks whether an agreement is binding.",
"version": "2026-06-12",
"author": {
"name": "Andrew Bird"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Employment Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/settlement-agreement-review-andrew-bird"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "unfair-dismissal-screener-andrew-bird",
"source": "./",
"description": "Screens a dismissal — proposed or already done — against the unfair dismissal framework for England & Wales, and shows where it is exposed. Structures the qualifying-service question, the automatically-unfair categories (no qualifying period), and a Burchell / Polkey / band-of-reasonable-responses analysis for a solicitor to verify — it does not determine fairness. Surfaces specific procedural risks. Use when the user says 'is this unfair', 'screen this dismissal', 'ordinary unfair dismissal', 'automatic unfair dismissal', or wants a structured fairness review before or after dismissal.",
"version": "2026-06-12",
"author": {
"name": "Andrew Bird"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Employment Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/unfair-dismissal-screener-andrew-bird"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "csrd-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about CSRD, European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), double materiality assessment, sustainability reporting obligations, ESG disclosure, CSRD scope and thresholds, value chain reporting, XBRL digital tagging, third-party assurance, CSRD gap assessments, CSRD implementation timelines, ESRS E1–E5 environmental standards, ESRS S1–S4 social standards, ESRS G1 governance, CSRD vs GRI/TCFD/SASB alignment, or any EU corporate sustainability reporting question.",
"category": "Environmental Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/csrd-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "hipaa-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts. Use this skill whenever the user mentions HIPAA, PHI (Protected Health Information), ePHI, covered entities, business associates, healthcare data privacy, medical records, health information security, BAA (Business Associate Agreements), or any compliance review involving patient data. Also trigger for requests to draft privacy notices, HIPAA policies, consent forms, security risk assessments, or breach notification letters. Use for developers building healthcare software who need technical safeguard guidance (encryption, access controls, audit logs), compliance officers reviewing documents or procedures.",
"category": "Health Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/hipaa-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "central-african-special-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "“Verification-first” methodology for the Special Criminal Court of the Central African Republic, a hybrid court seated in Bangui. Every citation is verified against JusticeInfo, FIDH, HRW, and legal-tools.org; the official sites often return a 403 error. Covers the Paoua case, the word “notamment” in Article 3, and complementarity with the ICC. Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-10",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/central-african-special-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "court-of-bih-war-crimes-chamber-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Verification-first methodology for Section I (War Crimes) of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Citations are verified against the Court of BiH, the ICTY/IRMCT archives and OSCE. Distinguishes ICTY-referred (Rule 11 bis) cases from locally-initiated ones; covers Stanković, Janković and the Maktouf lex mitior ruling. Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-11",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/court-of-bih-war-crimes-chamber-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eccc-khmer-rouge-tribunal-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Verification-first methodology for the ECCC (Khmer Rouge Tribunal). Every citation is verified against eccc.gov.kh, the ECCC archive or legal-tools.org. Covers Case File numbering, the 001/002/002-01/002-02 structure, the genocide findings against the Cham and the Vietnamese, and the Internal Rules revision discipline. Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-09",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/eccc-khmer-rouge-tribunal-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "extraordinary-african-chambers-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "“Verification-first” methodology for the Extraordinary African Chambers, covering the Hissène Habré trial in Dakar. Every citation is verified against forumchambresafricaines.org and legal-tools.org. Covers the judgment of May 30, 2016, the appeal judgment of April 27, 2017, reparations of CFAF 82.290 billion for 7,396 victims, and universal jurisdiction. Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-10",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/extraordinary-african-chambers-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "icty-ictr-irmct-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Verification-first methodology for the ICTY, the ICTR and the Residual Mechanism (IRMCT). Citations are verified against irmct.org, the Case Law and Unified Court Records databases, and legal-tools.org. Handles the IT/ICTR to MICT case-number transition (Karadžić, Mladić) and the protective-measures rule. Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-09",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/icty-ictr-irmct-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "international-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Research, drafting, and analysis involving the International Criminal Court (Rome Statute system). Enforces a verification-first methodology — every case-law, decision, filing, warrant, and statement citation is verified against an authoritative primary source (icc-cpi.int, legal-tools.org) in the current conversation before it appears in an output. Foundational texts (Rome Statute, Elements of Crimes, RPE, Regulations of the Court) may be cited from project knowledge when present. Use whenever the user is working with ICC case law, OTP statements, ASP documents, or ICC procedure.",
"version": "2026-06-05",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/international-criminal-court-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "kosovo-specialist-chambers-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Verification-first methodology for the Kosovo Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor's Office (The Hague, applying Kosovo law). Citations are verified against scp-ks.org before use; appeal registry numbers are cited only once confirmed. Covers Thaçi et al., Mustafa, Pjetër Shala and Gucati & Haradinaj. Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-10",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/kosovo-specialist-chambers-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "nuremberg-tokyo-tribunals-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Verification-first methodology for the post-WWII tribunals: the IMT at Nuremberg, the twelve Nuremberg Military Tribunals, and the IMTFE at Tokyo. Citations are verified against the official records (Blue/Green Series, Pritchard-Zaide) and the digital archives (Avalon, Harvard NTP, UVA IMTFE). Guards the four classic traps (IMT vs NMT; Nuremberg vs Tokyo; Charter article numbers; majority judgment vs separate opinions, e.g. the Pal dissent). Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-10",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/nuremberg-tokyo-tribunals-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "special-court-for-sierra-leone-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Verification-first methodology for the Special Court for Sierra Leone and its Residual Special Court. Citations are verified against rscsl.org and legal-tools.org. Covers Taylor, the AFRC/CDF/RUF cases, the child-soldier and forced-marriage holdings, the head-of-State immunity decision, and the fixed-term (no life) penalty regime. Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-10",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/special-court-for-sierra-leone-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Verification-first methodology for the Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (JEP), Colombia's transitional justice court under the 2016 Acuerdo Final with FARC-EP. Citations are verified against jep.gov.co before use. Covers the 11 macrocasos (from Caso 01 secuestro through Caso 11 violencia sexual, including Caso 03 falsos positivos), the three sanction tiers (propias, alternativas, ordinarias), TOAR, and the SIVJRNR sister bodies (CEV, UBPD). Guards the key structural distinctions (Sala de Reconocimiento vs Tribunal para la Paz; comparecientes FARC-EP vs Fuerza Pública vs terceros civiles; Acto Legislativo 01/2017 vs Ley Estatutaria 1957/2019). Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-07-04",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/special-jurisdiction-for-peace-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "special-panels-timor-leste-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Verification-first methodology for the Special Panels for Serious Crimes of the Dili District Court (UNTAET, 2000–2006). Citations are verified against JSMP, the UN archives and legal-tools.org. Covers the Los Palos case, the Serious Crimes Unit caseload (391 indicted; about 88 tried) and the SPSC-vs-Jakarta distinction. Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-10",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/special-panels-timor-leste-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "special-tribunal-for-lebanon-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Verification-first methodology for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Citations are verified against the STL legacy archive and legal-tools.org. Covers the Ayyash et al. case, the two contempt cases (STL-14-05 New TV/Al-Khayat and STL-14-06 Akhbar Beirut/Al-Amin), and the 2011 terrorism decision. Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-10",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/special-tribunal-for-lebanon-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "unmik-regulation-64-panels-jeanne-sulzer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Verification-first methodology for the UNMIK Regulation 64 Panels of the Kosovo district courts (2000–2008). Citations are verified against UNMIK/EULEX archives and legal-tools.org. Keeps the Reg. 64 Panels distinct from the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, and clarifies that Reg. 2000/64 permitted (did not impose) internationally-majority panels. Research aid, not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-06-11",
"author": {
"name": "Jeanne Sulzer"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/unmik-regulation-64-panels-jeanne-sulzer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "wcag-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) advisor covering WCAG 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2 — the W3C international accessibility standards. Use this skill whenever a user asks about WCAG success criteria, conformance levels (A/AA/AAA), accessibility audits, POUR principles, accessibility statements, ARIA patterns, colour contrast, keyboard accessibility, screen reader compatibility, mobile accessibility, cognitive accessibility, WCAG 2.2 new criteria, WCAG 3.0 preview, legal requirements referencing WCAG (EN 301 549, EAA, ADA, Section 508), or mapping WCAG to accessibility laws.",
"category": "Human Rights",
"skills": [
"./skills/wcag-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "droit-etrangers-asile-el-ouertani-faouzi",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expertise complète en droit français des étrangers, de l'asile et de la nationalité — entrée et visas, séjour (CESEDA livre IV, AES, étranger malade, regroupement familial, métiers en tension), éloignement et contentieux (OQTF, IRTF, rétention, référés, TA/CAA/CE), asile (OFPRA, CNDA, Dublin, CMA/ADA), nationalité et droits sociaux des étrangers (AME, PUMa, RSA, AAH, ASPA). Interroge en priorité trois connecteurs MCP complémentaires — OpenLegi (textes, jurisprudence administrative), LibreJustice (recherche sémantique tous ordres) et Legal Data Hunter (rétention/JLD, graphe de citations, statut de validité) — puis les sources officielles (Légifrance, ANEF, OFPRA, CNDA) et la doctrine associative (GISTI, Cimade, ADDE, Comede, Anafé). Déclencher dès qu'une question porte sur un étranger en France, même sans vocabulaire juridique — « papier de la préfecture », « récépissé périmé », « la CAF refuse le RSA » — et pour toute consultation, recours, note ou vérification de références dans ces matières.",
"category": "Immigration Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/droit-etrangers-asile-el-ouertani-faouzi"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "originality-in-european-copyright-joris-deene",
"source": "./",
"description": "Determines whether a given subject matter qualifies for copyright protection under EU law by applying the Cofemel two-step test (concept of work + originality), grounded in fifteen CJEU judgments (including the most recent Mio/Konektra and Calinescu) and the four EU directive provisions on originality. It argues from one of two positions: pro-rightsholder (establishing that the work is original) or pro-alleged-infringer (contesting work status or originality via the four exclusion grounds — technical function, rule-dictated outcome, sweat of the brow, idea/functionality). It includes sector-specific modules for photography, software/GUI, sporting events, databases, applied art, functional texts, derivative works/critical editions, and multimedia works.",
"version": "2026-05-17",
"author": {
"name": "Joris Deene"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Intellectual Property",
"skills": [
"./skills/originality-in-european-copyright-joris-deene"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "trademark-search-robb-miller",
"source": "./",
"description": "Run an attorney-facing knockout/availability trademark search across the United States and Canada. Use whenever a user (founder, client, or attorney) asks whether a brand, mark, name, logo, slogan, or product name is \"available,\" \"free to use,\" \"clearable,\" or \"already taken\" — or asks Claude to \"search the trademark register,\" \"check USPTO,\" \"check CIPO,\" \"do a knockout search,\" \"clearance search,\" \"availability search,\" or \"see if [mark] is trademarked.\" Trigger even when the user phrases it casually (\"can I call my company X?\", \"is this name taken?\"). Covers federal USPTO (TESS/TSDR), federal Canada (CIPO), common-law/web/state, and WIPO Madrid international. Output is a knockout availability memo with green/yellow/red verdict for attorney review. Includes professional-responsibility gating (AI-use disclosure, conflict check, scope confirmation) before substantive analysis. Not legal advice — produces work product for attorney sign-off.",
"version": "2026-06-05",
"author": {
"name": "Robb Miller"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Intellectual Property",
"skills": [
"./skills/trademark-search-robb-miller"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "customs-trade-law-onur-kafkas",
"source": "./",
"description": "U.S. customs and trade-law research assistant for HTS classification, CROSS ruling research, CIT/CAFC decision briefing, duty compilation (General + Special + Chapter 99 + AD/CVD + MPF/HMF), country of origin determination, FTA qualification, and end-to-end import compliance review. Triggers on product classification, tariff questions, customs rulings, trade remedy screening (Section 301/232/201), Partner Government Agency admissibility, and UFLPA forced-labor analysis. Produces attorney-reviewable draft work product with an enforced HTSUS authority hierarchy and explicit evidence ledger.",
"version": "2026-05-14",
"author": {
"name": "Onur Kafkas"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "International Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/customs-trade-law-onur-kafkas"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "icelandic-eea-gap-analysis-magnus-smarason",
"source": "./",
"description": "Use this skill when asked to analyze how Iceland has implemented an EU directive or regulation into national law, identify gaps between EU/EEA law and Icelandic implementation, or assess Iceland's compliance with EEA obligations. Triggers on questions about EEA transposition, ESA infringement, or EU-Iceland legal gaps.",
"version": "2026-04-11",
"author": {
"name": "Magnus Smári Smárason"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "International Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/icelandic-eea-gap-analysis-magnus-smarason"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "canned-response-generator-anthropic",
"source": "./",
"description": "Generate templated responses for common legal inquiries and identify when situations require individualized attention. Use when responding to routine legal questions — data subject requests, vendor inquiries, NDA requests, discovery holds — or when managing response templates.",
"version": "2026.01.30",
"author": {
"name": "Anthropic"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/canned-response-generator-anthropic"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "client-explanation-translator-larissa-meredith-flister",
"source": "./",
"description": "Turn complex legal analysis into clear, commercially useful client-facing advice. Use this whenever the user has dense legal material — drafting, internal analysis, counsel notes, research memos, pleadings, a case update, or correspondence — and wants it converted into something a client can actually understand and act on. Trigger on phrases like 'explain this to the client', 'put this in plain English', 'translate this for a non-lawyer', 'turn this into client-facing advice', 'make this client-ready', 'draft a client update', or when the user shares legal analysis and asks 'what does this mean for them'. Also trigger when the user wants a board summary, litigation risk update, or call script derived from legal material. The skill preserves legal nuance, uncertainty, and risk rather than oversimplifying — it makes advice usable, not just simpler.",
"version": "2026-06-10",
"author": {
"name": "Larissa Meredith-Flister"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/client-explanation-translator-larissa-meredith-flister"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "connecticut-divorce-planner-stephane-boghossian",
"source": "./",
"description": "Claude skill that turns Claude into a Connecticut-specific divorce planner — nine operating modes from pre-flight intake to post-judgment modification, modeled on Untangle.us's feature surface and grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b, Practice Book Chapter 25, and the 2026-08-01 CCSG schedule. Covers eligibility triage (nonadversarial under § 46b-44a vs standard), financial affidavit (JD-FM-6), child support (JD-FM-220 / CCSG-1 / 1A), alimony (§ 46b-82 fourteen factors), parenting plan (with GAL/AMC escalation under JD-FM-224), settlement agreement (JD-FM-172, TCJA-aware), filing packet (marshal 12-day rule, $360 + $50 fees, JD-FM-75 waiver), and post-judgment motion practice. Hard UPL gate: refuses non-CT, domestic violence (refers CTCADV 1-888-774-2900), hidden assets, courtroom advocacy. Heppner-aware: AI prompts are not privileged. First family-law skill in the Lawvable registry.",
"version": "2026-05-15",
"author": {
"name": "Stephane Boghossian"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/connecticut-divorce-planner-stephane-boghossian"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "divorce-practice-stephane-boghossian",
"source": "./",
"description": "AI co-counsel for divorce and family-law attorneys — a jurisdiction-portable scaffold spanning the full matter lifecycle. Eight operating modes mirror how a matter actually moves: intake and onboarding, financial disclosure, children and support, property division and QDRO, discovery and document review, drafting, negotiation and mediation prep, and court prep — plus post-judgment modification and enforcement. The methodology is jurisdiction-agnostic: it forces real, verifiable research for every local form, formula, or rule rather than inventing one, handling common-law, community-property, civil-law, and MENA personal-status regimes as variables. Built around one non-negotiable: privilege. It drafts, analyzes, organizes, and pressure-tests. It is not the lawyer.",
"version": "2026-06-29",
"author": {
"name": "Stephane Boghossian"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/divorce-practice-stephane-boghossian"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "en-uk-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-berg",
"source": "./",
"description": "A skill for anyone needing legal documents translated into publication-ready English. Hand it a Word file in any language; get back an English .docx with formatting preserved, delivering notably higher quality than e.g. Legora’s DeepL tool. Unique features: * Skill has built-in English general lexicons and per-language sub-lexicons (phrasebooks) covering M&A, IP, IT/SaaS, finance, tax, litigation, employment and more. Full sub-lexicon coverage for 11 languages including Spanish, German, French and Chinese; others translate really well too. * Track changes read correctly when accepted or rejected, and typos are collapsed. * Definitions reordered alphabetically. * Headers, footers, footnotes and comments translated. * Translates to UK English by default, US English on request. * Quality gates throughout. * Takes minutes rather than seconds and is larger than simpler skills, but overall quality is higher. US English default version here: https://lawve.ai/en/skills/en-us-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-berg",
"version": "2026-05-12",
"author": {
"name": "Wouter van den Berg - wouter@monteclima.com - linkedin.com/in/wjvandenberg"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/en-uk-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-berg"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "en-us-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-berg",
"source": "./",
"description": "A skill for anyone needing legal documents translated into publication-ready English. Hand it a Word file in any language; get back an English .docx with formatting preserved, delivering notably higher quality than e.g. Legora’s DeepL tool. Unique features: * Skill has built-in English general lexicons and per-language sub-lexicons (phrasebooks) covering M&A, IP, IT/SaaS, finance, tax, litigation, employment and more. Full sub-lexicon coverage for 11 languages including Spanish, German, French and Chinese; others translate really well too. * Track changes read correctly when accepted/rejected, and typos are collapsed. * Definitions reordered alphabetically. * Headers, footers, footnotes and comments translated. * Translates to US English by default, UK English on request. * Quality gates throughout. * Takes minutes rather than seconds and is larger than simpler skills, but overall quality is higher. UK English default version here: https://lawve.ai/en/skills/legal-translation-uk-english-wouter-van-den-berg",
"version": "2026-05-13",
"author": {
"name": "Wouter van den Berg - wouter@monteclima.com - linkedin.com/in/wjvandenberg"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/en-us-legal-translation-wouter-van-den-berg"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "fintech-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian",
"source": "./",
"description": "An end-to-end method for drafting and finalising a complex, multi-pillar regulated fintech agreement — from intake to signature. Authored from a senior fintech lawyer's manual: a licensed payment-services provider engaging a counterparty across agent cash-in/cash-out, QR payments, wallet e-payments, and a marketplace, each with its own regulatory profile. Runs five phases and fourteen steps: regulatory mapping (activity-to-licence matrix, grey-zone classification gates), architecture (framework-plus-sub-agreement structure, ring-fenced marketplace), the regulatory–commercial balance (what flexes vs what cannot), core drafting (authority, float mechanics, hard-coded regulator caps, liability — all tracking control), execution-blocker triage, and a pre-signature check closing open blockers as conditions precedent. It refuses to invent licence-specific values or draft a representation as true without executed evidence. Use it to structure, draft, negotiate, or review any regulated payments contract.",
"version": "2026-06-11",
"author": {
"name": "Stephane Boghossian"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/fintech-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "footnote-relegator-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Condense a scholarly legal article by moving nonessential detail from the body into substantive footnotes while preserving every word and keeping the argument self-sufficient. Handles Markdown and Word (.docx), integrates moved material with existing notes, measures a user-specified relegation fraction (25% by default), and delivers a move-by-move memo. Use when asked to \"push detail into footnotes,\" \"relegate to footnotes,\" \"footnote the caveats,\" \"move the digressions down,\" or tighten a dense draft without deleting content. Word output requires file access plus document-conversion and rendering support; when those capabilities are unavailable, deliver Markdown and the memo or ask for a convertible source.",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/footnote-relegator-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian",
"source": "./",
"description": "A drafting-and-review copilot for a founders' / co-founders' agreement — the terms fixing equity, vesting, IP, roles, control, deadlock, and departure between cofounders. Jurisdiction-agnostic, anchored on the Delaware C-corp default. Two modes: DRAFT (intake → equity & vesting → clauses → blocker triage → pre-signature check) and REVIEW (audit an existing agreement against an 18-clause checklist and red-flag scan). It handles the highest-dispute terms first-class: the equity split as documented reasoning (not a fake calculator), reverse vesting and the 83(b) clock, present-tense IP assignment (the Stanford v. Roche trap), leaver buyback and dead equity, and the deadlock clause most tools omit. It drafts for the venture, never one founder against another. Not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-07-06",
"author": {
"name": "Stephane Boghossian"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/founder-agreement-drafting-stephane-boghossian"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "humaniseur-juridique-gary-haas",
"source": "./",
"description": "Les LLM écrivent du juridique qui ressemble à du juridique sans en être. Formules creuses, attributions vagues, hedging systématique, latin décoratif : un praticien repère ces tics en trois lignes. Un juge aussi. Ce skill scanne 17 patterns typiques de l'écriture IA appliquée au droit français (conclusions, consultations, notes, mails, actes) et réécrit chaque passage pour retrouver le ton d'un avocat qui argumente, pas d'un modèle qui rédige. Le résultat : un texte engagé, précis, avec des références sourcées et une position claire. Pas un texte neutre qui \"reste à disposition pour tout complément\".",
"version": "2026-04-17",
"author": {
"name": "Legalfab"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/humaniseur-juridique-gary-haas"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "irac-prompt-builder-stephane-boghossian",
"source": "./",
"description": "Restructure any rough build, research, or legal-drafting request into an IRAC-shaped prompt — Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion — optimized for a frontier model. It's the bar-exam framework, repurposed as prompt engineering. The skill leads with the issue and ends with the conclusion (where models weight attention most), forces you to name your constraints and non-goals, and specifies what \"good\" looks like before a single token is generated. Use it before any non-trivial build, or whenever a vague ask deserves a precise brief.",
"version": "2026-06-05",
"author": {
"name": "Stephane Boghossian"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/irac-prompt-builder-stephane-boghossian"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-design-assessment-mirza-chiragov",
"source": "./",
"description": "Audits a legal document against legal design principles. Scores the document on six pillars: language patterns (bureaucratese, archaisms, passive voice, nominalization), readability (Flesch Reading Ease and language-specific equivalents), structure and navigation, hidden conditions (material obligations buried away from their headings), statutory duplication (restating the law instead of citing it), and visual hierarchy where layout is available. Assessment-only; does not rewrite the document. Works on English, French, and German documents, inferring the applicable jurisdiction from the document's language and textual signals: governing-law clause, statute citations, party addresses. Use when a user shares a legal document (contract, NDA, T&C, privacy policy, internal policy) asking how good the drafting is from a legal design perspective, whether it is readable, whether it contains buried clauses or restates the law, or how it scores on Flesch / LIX / Amstad / Kandel-Moles readability metrics.",
"version": "2026-05-14",
"author": {
"name": "Mirza Chiragov"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-design-assessment-mirza-chiragov"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-document-drafting-alessandro-dardano",
"source": "./",
"description": "Produces properly-formatted legal documents in Word (.docx). The user provides the substantive content (instructions, attached files, project knowledge); the skill handles document architecture and formatting. * No precedent or template required * Seven document families: agreements, corporate documents, litigation, memos, employment, policies, correspondence * Jurisdiction-agnostic — works across any legal system the user specifies * Multi-Chain numbering, defined-terms convention, structured recitals, atomic signature blocks * Also reformats existing .docx to a consistent house style * Works in Claude.ai, Cowork, and Claude for Word",
"version": "2026-06-03",
"author": {
"name": "Alessandro Dardano"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-document-drafting-alessandro-dardano"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "persuasive-legal-writing-larissa-meredith-flister",
"source": "./",
"description": "Apply elite legal writing techniques drawn from Justice Kagan, Boies & Olson, and other top advocates to any legal document — briefs, submissions, letters, opinions, memos, or persuasive correspondence. Covers both prose craft (clarity, concrete examples, parallel construction, voice, strategic quoting) and architectural strategy (argument sequencing, framing, openings, endings), plus a dedicated section on detecting and removing AI-sounding patterns from legal prose. Use whenever drafting, editing, or sharpening any legal document that needs to genuinely persuade, not just be technically correct.",
"version": "2026-05-01",
"author": {
"name": "Larissa Meredith-Flister"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/persuasive-legal-writing-larissa-meredith-flister"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "source-locked-verification-larissa-meredith-flister",
"source": "./",
"description": "Forces Claude to answer only from user-provided materials and online sources it has actually accessed. No inference, no assumptions, no gap-filling. Every factual, legal, numerical, or procedural claim must be anchored to a cited source, with statements categorised as expressly stated, verified online, supported, not found, or labelled inference. Built for legal and evidential work where fidelity to the record matters more than completeness.",
"version": "2026-05-13",
"author": {
"name": "Larissa Meredith-Flister"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/source-locked-verification-larissa-meredith-flister"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "tabular-review-antoine-louis",
"source": "./",
"description": "Guide to analyze multiple documents (PDF, DOCX) against user-defined columns and produce a structured Excel output with citations. Use when the user wants to: (1) Extract specific information from multiple documents into a table, (2) Compare clauses or provisions across contracts, (3) Create a document review matrix with source citations.",
"version": "2026-04-10",
"author": {
"name": "Dr. Antoine Louis"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Drafting",
"skills": [
"./skills/tabular-review-antoine-louis"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "california-bar-complete-robb-miller",
"source": "./",
"description": "Guide for end-to-end California Bar Exam prep — the five essays (13 subjects), the 90-minute Performance Test, and the 200-question MBE (7 subjects). Built by a practicing attorney who used it to compress four months of prep into a week and a half.",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/california-bar-complete-robb-miller"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "case-briefer-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Produces detailed law-school case briefs of United States judicial opinions in a fixed nine-section structure: memory jogger, facts, procedural history, judicial votes, holding, opinion-by-opinion analysis, five future-application hypotheticals, critique, and verified key quotations. Also builds vote tables, cross-case consistency tables, perspective-based critiques, and LaTeX in article, Beamer and casebook-chapter formats. Use whenever someone asks to brief a case, analyse or explain an opinion, summarise a decision for students, generate hypotheticals from a holding, critique a judgment, tabulate how justices voted, or convert case analysis to LaTeX. Triggers on \"brief this case\", \"case brief\", \"explain the holding\", \"what did the court hold\", \"hypotheticals based on\", \"critique this opinion\", \"vote table\", \"Beamer presentation\", \"chapter brief\", and on any reference to a judicial opinion or Supreme Court decision in a teaching context. Requires web search to verify quotations, votes and holdings.",
"version": "2026-07-29",
"author": {
"name": "Seth J. Chandler"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/case-briefer-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "jev-question-translator-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Turns a legal question, a set of draft questions, or source material such as a statute, jury instruction, rubric, contract checklist, or coding manual into a battery of narrow questions that TypeSafe's Jev, a fast classifier that returns probabilities rather than prose, can answer reliably across many documents. The skill breaks conclusions such as negligence, felony murder, or standing into element-level questions, writes the governing rule into each question, and delivers the questions alone, in Jev's request format or in plain English. Built for legal work that asks the same questions of many texts: coding statutes across jurisdictions, coding opinions or case files for empirical research, checking contracts against a review checklist, screening intake narratives, and grading student work against a rubric. Use when asked to write Jev questions, build a classifier for legal documents, or turn a legal test into yes-or-no questions. Running the questions requires Jev access; writing them does not.",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/jev-question-translator-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "law-review-editor-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Rigorous multi-pass editor for law review articles, student notes, seminar papers and other legal scholarship. Runs six specialized passes — structure, substantive critique, Bluebook citations, grammar and clarity, fact-checking against sources, and a synthesizing memo — and delivers an editorial memo with issues prioritized as critical, substantial or minor and keyed to specific footnotes and paragraphs. Handles articles of any length, including 50,000-word pieces, by chunking on section boundaries. Reads .docx directly. Use when editing, critiquing, workshopping or pre-submission-reviewing academic legal writing. Triggers on \"edit my article,\" \"review this draft,\" \"critique my note,\" \"check my Bluebook citations,\" \"is my argument sound,\" \"read my law review piece,\" \"workshop this paper,\" \"pre-submission review.\" Chunking needs Python 3; fact-checking needs web search; both degrade gracefully without.",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/law-review-editor-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-ai-simulator-patrick-munro",
"source": "./",
"description": "Framework for demonstrating AI capabilities in legal contexts. Provides detailed personas across tenant law, business contracts, startup disputes, employment claims, and consumer protection with progressive complexity scenarios. Use when: (1) Demonstrating AI-powered legal triage or intake systems, (2) Showcasing responsible AI-assisted client interactions, (3) Training staff on appropriate AI use in legal contexts, (4) Creating realistic scenarios for legal tech presentations, (5) Developing educational materials about AI in legal services, or (6) Testing AI-powered legal information systems in controlled environments.",
"version": "2026.01.12",
"author": {
"name": "Patrick Munro"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-ai-simulator-patrick-munro"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-test-builder-patrick-munro",
"source": "./",
"description": "Builds a high-fidelity interactive legal assessment as a single self-contained HTML artifact. Output includes a live countdown timer, contract review tasks with hover-annotated problem clauses, candidate answer textareas, model answers hidden behind reveal blocks, scenario-based legal memo tasks, strategy and function-building questions, and a pre-submission checklist that encodes the marking criteria. Use when the user needs to (1) assess a legal candidate with a realistic timed exercise, (2) train or onboard junior lawyers using problem sets rather than doctrine, (3) help a candidate prepare for a real take-home assessment they are facing, (4) build educational materials for law students, in-house teams, or compliance training, or (5) produce scenario-based training modules on specific legal topics. Triggers on \"legal test\", \"take-home\", \"mock exam\", \"contract redline exercise\", \"candidate assessment\", \"legal training exercise\", \"practice test\", or similar phrasing even when informal.",
"version": "2026-04-25",
"author": {
"name": "Patrick Munro"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-test-builder-patrick-munro"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "mandarinat-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assistant académique pour enseignants-chercheurs en droit. Six tâches : (1) recherche juridique approfondie avec accent doctrinal, (2) relecture de documents avec vérification des références, commentaires Word, détection d'indices de plagiat/IA et cohérence argumentative, (3) création de sujets et corrigés d'exercices juridiques universitaires, (4) mise à jour de cours, ouvrages et documents juridiques, (5) création de cours avec support docx et PPTX, (6) préparation de fiches de TD.",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/mandarinat-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "mediation-problem-generator-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Create original, competition-ready commercial mediation problems and confidential packets with iterative validation. Use when a user provides a topic, industry, dispute sketch, or existing general-information packet and wants a public packet plus confidential packets for both sides—or one named side. Build a narrow but workable settlement corridor; verify factual and numerical consistency, information asymmetry, balance, originality, and commercial feasibility; and revise until deterministic and semantic exit criteria pass. Do not use merely to summarize an existing packet or to advise parties in a real dispute. Requires local file access; Python 3 is recommended for bundled deterministic checks, with disclosed manual fallbacks when unavailable.",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/mediation-problem-generator-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "mediation-problem-validator-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Evaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, numerical, chronological, authority, commercial-logic, or confidentiality defects; test mediation usefulness, BATNAs, settlement corridors, information asymmetry, and opportunities for firmness, cooperation, imagination, and clarification; or produce an author-only validation report. Perform a qualified partial review when packets are missing. Diagnose by default; do not generate a new problem or edit source packets unless repairs are expressly requested. Requires access to all supplied files and a host capable of reading their formats; otherwise disclose the unreviewed material and resulting limits.",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/mediation-problem-validator-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "note-de-synthese-crfpa-allison-fiorentino",
"source": "./",
"description": "Génération de sujets d'entraînement complets pour l'épreuve de NOTE DE SYNTHÈSE (5 heures, coefficient 3) de l'examen d'accès au CRFPA : choix du sujet, dossier documentaire de 16 à 20 documents assemblé à partir de sources réelles vérifiées (textes, jurisprudence, travaux parlementaires, doctrine) avec contrôle du verbatim, puis grille de notation au modèle de la Commission nationale (résumé de chaque document, problématique, thèmes cotés sur 20, plan). Livraison en deux fichiers .docx distincts, le sujet et la grille. Si l'utilisateur n'impose pas de sujet, en chercher un dans l'actualité juridique. Mode aveugle pour l'étudiant qui compose sans rien voir du corrigé. Déclencher dès que l'utilisateur demande un sujet de note de synthèse, un dossier documentaire, une note de synthèse blanche, un entraînement à l'épreuve de 5 heures du CRFPA ou de l'IEJ, ou une grille de note de synthèse. NE PAS déclencher pour les épreuves de 3 heures (sujet-crfpa-toutes-matieres) ni pour la correction de copies.\\n",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/note-de-synthese-crfpa-allison-fiorentino"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "qcm-generateur-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Génération assistée de QCM (questionnaires à choix multiples) avec export vers Moodle (GIFT, XML), Wooclap (Excel), Kahoot! et Word. Supporte QCM légers (ludiques) et approfondis (évaluatifs), à choix unique et réponses multiples.",
"version": "2026-04-10",
"author": {
"name": "Christophe Quézel-Ambrunaz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/qcm-generateur-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "reader-first-technical-edit-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Edit mathematically, empirically, or technically dense papers for readers outside the author’s specialty, including empirical legal scholarship, law-and-economics models, and legal-technology research. Clarifies terminology, antecedents, study design, and claim–statistic relationships while checking equations, numbers, quotations, and citations against the source. Use to clarify exposition or de-jargonize a technical draft; not to rewrite briefs or doctrinal arguments. Produces an edited draft and audit memo. Full integrity checks and original-format rendering require suitable extraction, code execution, and document tools; otherwise provides proposed edits with verification limits disclosed.",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/reader-first-technical-edit-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "relecteur-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Optimise Claude pour la relecture des textes en français, qu'ils soient littéraires, techniques, professionnels... Vérification de la grammaire, de l'orthographe, traque des barbarismes, suggestions de modifications stylistiques.",
"version": "2026-04-10",
"author": {
"name": "Christophe Quézel-Ambrunaz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/relecteur-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "sujet-crfpa-allison-fiorentino",
"source": "./",
"description": "Ce skill génère des sujets d'entraînement pour les deux épreuves écrites de consultation du CRFPA : l'épreuve de droit des obligations (tronc commun) et l'épreuve de spécialité (civil, affaires, social, pénal, administratif, international et européen, fiscal). Chaque sujet est accompagné d'une grille de notation détaillée sur 20 points. Vous ciblez un thème précis, ou vous laissez le skill procéder à un tirage au sort couvrant l'ensemble du programme. Connexion aux MCP OpenLegi et GoodLegal requise : toutes les références d'articles et d'arrêts sont vérifiées sur les sources officielles, sans citation inventée",
"version": "2026-06-12",
"author": {
"name": "Allison Fiorentino"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/sujet-crfpa-allison-fiorentino"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "thesis-assesor-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Critically assess and improve a legal scholarly thesis, article idea, student note, seminar-paper claim, or research agenda using Eugene Volokh's novelty, nonobviousness, utility, and soundness framework, connector-aware research, claim-specific tests, and a sustainable adversarial pass. Produces a self-contained green-, yellow-, or red-light report. Use when a law professor or law student asks whether a claim is viable, novel, publishable, preempted, useful, worth pursuing, or better than competing topics; or wants a thesis stress-tested, narrowed, repaired, or compared. No connector is required: use connected legal and scholarly research when available, public sources otherwise, and disclose any no-research fallback.",
"category": "Legal Education",
"skills": [
"./skills/thesis-assesor-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "agentic-delegation-audit-adrian-lerer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Use when a lawyer, legal team, or client needs to assess AI agents that can act on someone's behalf: send messages, search, draft, file, pay, delete, connect to accounts, use tools, or rely on external data. Produces a practical delegation, oversight, accountability, and control audit for legal operations.",
"version": "2026-06-05",
"author": {
"name": "Ignacio Adrián Lerer"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/agentic-delegation-audit-adrian-lerer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "ambiguity-report-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Turn an interpretive-ambiguity audit of a legal text — contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — into a polished deliverable. Produces a multi-page website (default), a single-page site, a self-contained single-file HTML page, a Word document, a PowerPoint deck, or LaTeX source. Use whenever a user has a stress-test result, ambiguity audit, or \"where will this be litigated\" scenarios and wants to publish, present, or share them. Triggers on \"publish the audit,\" \"make a report from this,\" \"turn this into a website / deck / brief / Word doc,\" \"make a Netlify site,\" \"build slides of these ambiguities,\" \"render the scenarios,\" \"package this stress test,\" \"produce a LaTeX version,\" and similar. Pairs with the ambiguity-stress-test skill (the underlying analysis) but works on any structured or semi-structured ambiguity analysis. Design is opinionated but colors, fonts and brand label are overridable. Most formats need Python and a writable filesystem; single-file HTML works where the host has neither.",
"version": "2026-07-29",
"author": {
"name": "Seth J. Chandler"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/ambiguity-report-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "billable-time-stephane-boghossian",
"source": "./",
"description": "When your bar comes asking \"show me how you billed AI-assisted work\" — and ABA 512, Florida 24-1, California, New York, and DC all have opinions out — you need an artifact that survives review. billable-time produces it. From your Claude Code session logs, it drafts reviewable time entries plus a printable HTML audit packet with: SHA-256 chain of evidence (source files + matter.yml + active disclosure pack + verifiable artifact self-hash), attorney identity and signature block, a bar-opinion disclosure pack with starter language for five jurisdictions, and content-aware deterministic narratives derived from filename and tool shape — never from prompt text by default. The tool refuses to bill on its own. --strict mode refuses to ship the artifact if any audit invariant fails (broad routes, missing attorney, missing/unverified disclosure). Comes as a Node CLI and a self-contained browser version (no backend; JSONL never leaves the page). 15 invariant tests verify the contract. AGPL-3.0.",
"version": "2026-05-18",
"author": {
"name": "Stephane Boghossian"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/billable-time-stephane-boghossian"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "billing-cycle-manager-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Operational billing execution for legal matters. Monthly bill prep and billing instructions, LC invoice review and disbursement treatment, client billing query responses, cashflow modelling, and leverage and burn analysis (staffing mix, predicted total cost, margin trajectory).",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/billing-cycle-manager-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "budget-and-fee-manager-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Build, monitor, and adjust fee budgets across the full matter lifecycle. At matter setup: translate scope into a phase-based fee estimate with contingency and AFA structure. In flight: run WIP reviews that explain variance, not just report it. When scope changes are confirmed: model the financial impact.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/budget-and-fee-manager-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "collaboration-platform-advisor-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Collaboration platform configuration methodology for legal matter sites. Site architecture, workflow identification, dashboard design, data quality governance, and user adoption for SharePoint, Teams, and equivalent platforms. Outputs are platform-agnostic enough to brief IT or build simple automations.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/collaboration-platform-advisor-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "continuous-improvement-engine-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Capture, structure, and recycle lessons from active and closed legal matters. Three modes: in-flight capture (triggered by scope changes, risk events, status updates), mid-matter review (phase gates or quarterly), and matter close retrospective. Lessons are formatted for immediate reuse, not filed and forgotten.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/continuous-improvement-engine-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "decision-ownership-audit-adrian-lerer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Audits AI-assisted legal, compliance, governance, and institutional decisions before reliance to determine whether the responsible human or institution has enough access to the evidence, reasoning basis, uncertainty, authority, and review path to genuinely own the decision rather than merely approve, sign, or transmit it.",
"version": "2026-06-03",
"author": {
"name": "Ignacio Adrián Lerer"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/decision-ownership-audit-adrian-lerer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "document-approval-tracker-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Approval cascade definition and tracking for multi-stakeholder document workflows. Internal review sequences, client approval workflows, regulatory review, overdue chasing with escalation logic, version control coordination, and cross-jurisdiction document dependencies.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/document-approval-tracker-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eardraft-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Transforms reading-oriented prose into listening-optimized text for flat, neutral vocal delivery — TTS, podcasts, audiobooks, CLE audio. Carries a legal layer: case citations, section symbols, subsection lettering, Latin terms and footnotes are unspeakable as written, so a brief, opinion, statute, contract or memo needs them expanded, restructured or stripped before it can be listened to — and quoted authority is never rewritten. Use when converting written content for audio, preparing oral argument by ear, producing CLE or client-facing audio, or making a document listenable on a commute. Triggers on \"make this listenable,\" \"convert for audio,\" \"optimize for reading aloud,\" \"prepare for TTS,\" \"make an audio version,\" \"podcast script,\" \"read this aloud.\" Supports English, French, Spanish, Italian, German and Portuguese; outputs plain text, ElevenLabs audio tags, or SSML for Amazon Polly, Google or Azure.",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/eardraft-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "engagement-terms-billing-guidelines-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Drafts, reviews, and maintains outside counsel guidelines (OCGs) — the operational document that sets expectations for how external law firms bill, staff, communicate, and deliver legal services. OCGs are the single lowest-cost, highest-impact intervention available to an in-house legal ops function. 60% of in-house teams don't have them. Of the 40% that do, 87% barely enforce them. This skill encodes the methodology for building OCGs calibrated to the team's maturity level and producing the internal business case to get them adopted.",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/engagement-terms-billing-guidelines-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "epistemic-fault-line-audit-adrian-lerer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Audits legal AI outputs, prompts, skills, workflows and MCP/tool instructions for fluent but unsupported reasoning, missing evidence, overconfidence, hidden assumptions, weak causal links and absent human-review gates.",
"version": "2026-05-31",
"author": {
"name": "Ignacio Adrián Lerer"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/epistemic-fault-line-audit-adrian-lerer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "fee-arrangement-structuring-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "AFA design, scope-to-fee matching, negotiation preparation, health check, and scope dispute assessment for in-house legal ops teams managing outside counsel arrangements. Design fee structures (fixed, capped, collar, blended, phased, success). Assess whether scope supports a proposed AFA. Prepare commercial positions for fee negotiations. Review existing AFAs against delivery data. Assess OOS claims and build dispute response. Trigger on: 'structure the fee', 'move off hourly', 'design an AFA', 'does scope support a fixed fee?', 'negotiate the fee', 'renegotiate the arrangement', 'is our AFA holding?', 'fee health check', 'cap is being approached', 'firm is claiming OOS', 'is this in scope?', 'is this OOS?', 'AI should reduce the cost', 'blended rate vs fixed', 'collar arrangement', 'phased fees'.",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/fee-arrangement-structuring-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "invoice-review-compliance-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Reviews outside counsel invoices against billing guidelines, flags non-compliant entries by category, and produces the documents needed to approve, reduce, reject, and communicate those decisions. Covers the full invoice compliance workflow: line-item review through to formal firm escalation. Works with or without an e-billing platform. Where an e-billing system is in place, LEDES format and UTBMS coding are hard gates. Where there is no e-billing system, invoice submission by email is the channel and UTBMS coding is a best-efforts flag.",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/invoice-review-compliance-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-diagram-sam-zhai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Turns dense legal documents, matter notes, and brainstorming dumps into clear, editable Mermaid diagrams to make strategizing and communicating clearer and faster. Use timelines and Gantt charts to uncover chronology gaps, flowcharts and decision trees to map litigation paths and negotiation possibilities, and entity relationship or class diagrams to clarify ownership, control, and corporate structure. Upload source files (.md, .docx, .pdf, .xlsx, or .pptx), paste text, or describe the issue you’re working on. /legal-diagram guides you through a simple interactive process to setup the skill and create timelines, Gantt charts, org charts, obligation checklists, litigation flowcharts, decision trees, corporate structure diagrams, and more.",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-diagram-sam-zhai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-guidance-vault-michael-cremata",
"source": "./",
"description": "Helps a lawyer build and use a personalized Legal Guidance Vault — a local folder of structured, privilege-marked entries capturing legal guidance they've given, searchable later by topic, person, or product. Use this skill when the user says \"set up my vault,\" \"archive this meeting/email/thread/doc,\" \"log the guidance I gave on [topic],\" \"save my notes from [meeting],\" \"what did I say about [topic],\" \"find the time I advised [person] on [topic],\" or \"search my vault for [topic].\" Runs a setup interview to learn the user's tool stack (meeting notes, calendar, email, docs, messaging, vault location), then generates a customized vault prompt they can reuse in any future Claude session to start archiving and retrieving guidance.",
"version": "2026-05-07",
"author": {
"name": "Michael Cremata"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-guidance-vault-michael-cremata"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-mdl-audit-adrian-lerer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Audits legal AI outputs and workflows for honest compression: unnecessary complexity, false simplicity, excessive caveats, hidden uncertainty and poor cost per legally acceptable output.",
"version": "2026-05-31",
"author": {
"name": "Ignacio Adrián Lerer"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-mdl-audit-adrian-lerer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-transition-audit-adrian-lerer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Audits the transition from legal AI output to reliance, recommendation, execution, or real-world commitment. Use it before an AI-generated analysis, memo, contract review, compliance finding, or workflow output is acted upon to check whether authority, evidence, mandate, uncertainty, procedure, and review conditions remain sufficient.",
"version": "2026-06-03",
"author": {
"name": "Ignacio Adrián Lerer"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-transition-audit-adrian-lerer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "local-counsel-manager-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "End-to-end external local counsel lifecycle management for multi-jurisdiction legal matters. LC selection criteria and capability assessment, engagement setup and instruction design, performance monitoring and check-in cadence, scope enforcement, and relationship escalation.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/local-counsel-manager-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "matter-allocation-instruction-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Executes matter allocation and firm engagement from firm selection through to a live, properly-instructed matter. Match the right firm to a new matter using the right-sourcing framework. Produce a complete matter instruction ready to send. Generate the onboarding checklist that closes conflict clearance, engagement letter, OCG, and e-billing gates. Audit an existing instruction for gaps with a remediation note ready to send. This is the execution layer for a matter that has been sourced. Panel-design-selection (Skill 2) defines which firms are on the panel. RFP-pitch-management (Skill 3) selects firms through a competitive process. This skill instructs the selected firm and closes the onboarding gates.",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/matter-allocation-instruction-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "matter-intake-scoping-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Matter scoping across the full pre-execution arc — organise client data into a structured brief, capture the agreed baseline, or reconstruct scope mid-flight. Use when making sense of client information before a proposal, scoping a new matter, running a kickoff, defining scope, mapping stakeholders, or inheriting a matter mid-flight.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/matter-intake-scoping-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "matter-plan-builder-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Convert agreed scope into a structured matter plan — phases, workstreams, milestones, dependencies, owner assignments, and matter setup decisions. Use when planning a new matter, running a kickoff, building a workstream plan, structuring phases, or producing a plan to drive status reporting.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/matter-plan-builder-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "meeting-briefing-preparator-anthropic",
"source": "./",
"description": "Prepare structured briefings for meetings with legal relevance and track resulting action items. Use when preparing for contract negotiations, board meetings, compliance reviews, or any meeting where legal context, background research, or action tracking is needed.",
"version": "2026.01.30",
"author": {
"name": "Anthropic"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/meeting-briefing-preparator-anthropic"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "oral-argument-stephane-boghossian",
"source": "./",
"description": "Tribunal-prep skill modeled on Neal Katyal's Nov 2025 SCOTUS tariffs argument and his AI sparring partner \"Harvey.\" Five phases: (1) profile each decision-maker from prior opinions, questions, concurrences, and dissents — surface their doctrinal commitments and institutional concerns; (2) predict the bench — 3–7 likely questions per judge with the worry behind each, verbatim phrasing where confidence is high; (3) map escape routes — the narrowest holding each skeptical judge could sign without abandoning prior commitments; (4) spar adversarially — relentless follow-ups, calls out parroted lines, tracks which questions broke the lawyer; (5) hand the lawyer back to themselves with a < 150-word index card for the podium. The model is the sparring partner. The lawyer still wins the case. Use for oral argument, motion hearings, depositions, arbitrations, or stress-testing a brief before filing.",
"version": "2026-05-08",
"author": {
"name": "Stephane Boghossian"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/oral-argument-stephane-boghossian"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "outside-counsel-billing-and-performance-reviewer-carl-ditzler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Reviews outside counsel invoices and related billing data for an in-house legal department, including LEDES or e-billing exports, OCGs, approved rates, discounts, budgets, AFAs, and staffing rules. Starts with internal comparisons before bringing in external data. Produces invoice review findings, MBR/QBR scorecards, dispute logs, and management reports. For demonstration purposes only and not professional advice.",
"version": "2026.03.24.v3",
"author": {
"name": "Carl Ditzler"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/outside-counsel-billing-and-performance-reviewer-carl-ditzler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "panel-design-selection-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Designs panel structures, defines firm selection criteria, runs right-sourcing analysis, and assesses coverage gaps for in-house legal teams building or formalising their outside counsel panel. Panel design is not panel review. Design asks: what should the panel look like? Review asks: is the panel performing? This skill builds the framework. Panel-review-rationalisation (Skill 8) measures against it.",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/panel-design-selection-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "panel-review-rationalisation-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Executes the annual panel review cycle and ongoing panel governance decisions. Synthesises performance scorecard data, billing compliance records, and step-out patterns into panel-level recommendations. Produces the documentation for firm exits, coverage gap assessment, and competitive refresh processes. Covers the full panel governance workflow: annual health assessment through to firm exit and slot refresh.",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/panel-review-rationalisation-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "performance-scorecard-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Encodes the methodology for collecting, aggregating, and acting on firm performance data across the relationship lifecycle — from building the initial evaluation framework through to the comparative analysis that informs panel retention and exit decisions.",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/performance-scorecard-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "resource-planner-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Team structure, gearing analysis, continuity planning, and competing demand management for legal matters. Use when setting up a matter team, reviewing whether work is being done at the right grade, planning cover for an unavailable team member, or managing a resource conflict across matters.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/resource-planner-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "rfp-pitch-management-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Runs structured RFP processes for selecting outside counsel — from drafting the initial document through evaluating firm responses and producing a defensible selection recommendation for GC sign-off. An average law firm spends 47 hours on an RFP response. That cost gets built into the price of legal services. Poorly structured RFPs produce responses that are incomparable and select by default for the most polished proposal, not the best firm. This skill encodes the methodology for running processes that produce genuine comparability and defensible decisions.",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/rfp-pitch-management-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "risk-and-issues-manager-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "RAID log methodology with decision extraction from emails and meeting notes. Use when asked to identify risks, log assumptions, track issues, extract decisions from correspondence, create or update a RAID log, escalate a risk to an issue, assess project risks, validate or challenge assumptions, or capture scope-relevant decisions. Also triggers when the user pastes email chains and asks what decisions were made, or needs to find buried decisions and untested assumptions in correspondence.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/risk-and-issues-manager-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "scope-change-controller-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Scope management for legal matters — baseline capture, in-flight change control, OOS documentation, and scope retrospective. Use when asked to review scoping assumptions, assess whether work is in or out of scope, draft a scope change notice, track scope changes, prepare an OOS justification, run an OOS report, prepare a scope call agenda, or review what changed on a matter.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/scope-change-controller-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "stakeholder-comms-planner-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Stakeholder mapping, communication plan design, reporting hierarchy, and mid-matter comms updates. Use when setting up a new matter and needing to identify who needs what information, designing the communication rhythm, building reporting structures for multi-jurisdiction programmes, or updating the comms plan when the stakeholder landscape changes.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/stakeholder-comms-planner-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "status-report-drafter-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Draft matter status reports from emails, call notes, and updates. Internal and client-facing formats, RAG logic, variance commentary, escalation flags. Use when asked to draft a status report, write a project update, summarise matter progress, prepare a client report, create a weekly or monthly update, convert emails into a status summary, or produce any kind of matter reporting. Also triggers when the user pastes email threads and asks what the status is, or needs to turn internal updates into client-facing reports.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/status-report-drafter-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "timeline-generator-scott-margetts",
"source": "./",
"description": "Build dependency network and critical path from a matter plan. Produce an interactive Gantt, flag near-critical tasks, and run what-if cascade scenarios when delays occur — showing programme impact and drafting communications. Produces filtered workstream or jurisdiction views for local counsel.",
"version": "2026.03.17",
"author": {
"name": "Scott Margetts"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Operations",
"skills": [
"./skills/timeline-generator-scott-margetts"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "archeologue-gallica-allison-fiorentino",
"source": "./",
"description": "Recherche dans les fonds juridiques anciens numérisés par la BNF (API Gallica, sans clé) : débats parlementaires du JO depuis 1871, doctrine d'origine (Sirey, Dalloz, thèses du XIXe), jurisprudence ancienne (Bulletins civil et criminel, Lebon, Gazette des tribunaux), JO Lois et décrets 1881-2015. Chaque résultat est localisé à la page avec extrait océrisé et lien pérenne vers le fac-similé. Utilisez cette skill dès que l'utilisateur cherche l'origine historique d'un texte, d'un concept ou d'une jurisprudence, ou toute source antérieure aux bases modernes.",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/archeologue-gallica-allison-fiorentino"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "assistant-juridique-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assistant juridique expert couvrant le droit français, européen (UE et CEDH) et étranger via LegalDataHunter, pour professionnels et chercheurs. Couvre dix tâches : cadrage, recherche juridique, consultation, rédaction d'actes, analyse de pièces, contre-argumentaire, analyse de contrats, veille juridique, vérification de références et harmonisation bibliographique. Règle stricte d'anti-hallucination (Chercher → Trouver → Citer) avec vérification temporelle de chaque texte normatif via OpenLegi. Utilisez cette skill chaque fois que l'utilisateur mentionne du droit français ou européen, demande une recherche juridique, une consultation, la rédaction d'un acte, l'analyse d'un contrat ou d'une pièce, une vérification de citation OpenLegi/HAL/CEDH, ou prépare un dossier de plaidoirie — même sans dire explicitement « assistant juridique ».",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/assistant-juridique-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "employment-law-research-yue-deng-wu",
"source": "./",
"description": "This Skill creates a research brief for an area of US employment law. The brief can address a specific question or be a multi-state survey. It'll include citations to primary sources (e.g. statutes, rule, government guidance), and reputable secondary sources like client alerts and multi-state surveys from top law firms and articles from legal publications (e.g. National Law Review).",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/employment-law-research-yue-deng-wu"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-legislation-malik-taiar",
"source": "./",
"description": "Access EU law. Search and retrieve Directives, Regulations, Treaties and CJEU case law from EUR-Lex.",
"version": "2026-04-15",
"author": {
"name": "Malik Taiar"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-legislation-malik-taiar"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "gibraltar-regulatory-compliance-osint-philip-vasquez",
"source": "./",
"description": "A jurisdiction-grounding reference file for AI assistants working on Gibraltar legal, regulatory, and compliance research. Corrects systematic errors AI models make when applying English law to Gibraltar — a distinct jurisdiction under the Gibraltar Constitution Order 2006, with its own court hierarchy, civil procedure rules, employment law, and regulatory framework. Covers the source hierarchy, court structure, civil procedure divergences (14-day deemed service, post-Jackson reforms not adopted), employment law specifics (uncapped discrimination awards, 5-employee redundancy threshold), FSC financial services regulation, AML/KYC compliance sources, Gibraltar Companies Act 2014 with UBO public register, and a structured directory of official public record sources. Includes research profiles for lawyers, compliance professionals, and due diligence practitioners. Not legal advice.",
"version": "2026-07-08",
"author": {
"name": "Philip Vasquez"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/gibraltar-regulatory-compliance-osint-philip-vasquez"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "giurisprudenza-lampo-giovanna-panucci",
"source": "./",
"description": "Ricerca rapida della giurisprudenza italiana, finalizzata a fornire un primo quadro orientativo su una determinata questione giuridica. Consulta le pronunce della Corte di cassazione, dei TAR e del Consiglio di Stato, nonché le banche dati giuridiche italiane (DeJure, Italgiure), per individuare le decisioni pertinenti; sintetizza l’orientamento giurisprudenziale prevalente, segnala eventuali pronunce contrastanti ed evidenzia le implicazioni operative ai fini della formulazione di pareri o della definizione della strategia. Il risultato è una nota strutturata di primo orientamento, non un’analisi esaustiva.",
"version": "2026-05-12",
"author": {
"name": "Giovanna Panucci"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/giurisprudenza-lampo-giovanna-panucci"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "icelandic-court-case-finder-magnus-smarason",
"source": "./",
"description": "Use this skill when asked to find, cite, analyze, or summarize Icelandic court decisions. Triggers on requests involving Hæstiréttur (Supreme Court), Landsréttur (Court of Appeal), Félagsdómur (Labour Court), héraðsdómur (District Court) case law, or Icelandic legal precedent research.",
"version": "2026-04-11",
"author": {
"name": "Magnus Smári Smárason"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/icelandic-court-case-finder-magnus-smarason"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "icelandic-legal-terminology-magnus-smarason",
"source": "./",
"description": "Use this skill when asked to translate, explain, or map Icelandic legal terms to English (or vice versa). Triggers on requests involving Icelandic legal vocabulary, legal translation, understanding Icelandic statutes or court decisions, or cross-referencing Icelandic and common law concepts.",
"version": "2026-04-11",
"author": {
"name": "Magnus Smári Smárason"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/icelandic-legal-terminology-magnus-smarason"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "investigacion-juridica-matias-gv-rojas-faundez",
"source": "./",
"description": "Asistente jurídico experto en derecho chileno. Úsalo cuando el usuario haga consultas sobre normativa, códigos, procedimientos o jurisprudencia de Chile y necesite respuestas fundamentadas con cita de ley y artículo y una fuente verificable (BCN). No usar para derecho de otros países ni como reemplazo de asesoría legal formal. Funciona SIN base de datos externa: responde con el conocimiento del modelo, por lo que debe marcar toda incertidumbre y remitir a la fuente oficial para verificación.",
"version": "2026-06-06",
"author": {
"name": "Matías Germán Valentín Rojas Faúndez"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/investigacion-juridica-matias-gv-rojas-faundez"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian",
"source": "./",
"description": "Routes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, the Atticus Project's CUAD/MAUD/ACORD) plus translation evidence (WMT25, SwiLTra-Bench, ArabLegalEval). Covers five verticals: contract drafting, info extraction, legal research, contract review, and legal translation (including Arabic/MENA). Each asks up to four questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then returns a primary model, a fallback, what to avoid, and what a human must verify. Core principle: capability is not controllability, so every route ends with a verification step. Not legal advice; a lawyer owns the output.",
"version": "2026-07-14",
"author": {
"name": "Stephane Boghossian"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-ai-model-router-stephane-boghossian"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "legal-analysis-forge-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "EU Digital Regulation Legal Analysis Forge — generates a tailored expert prompt for structured legal analysis of an EU digital-regulation document, optionally executes it in-session, and always produces a plain-English explainer alongside the formal output. Handles Regulations, Directives, Commission Guidelines, EDPB Opinions, CJEU and AG judgments, national DPA decisions, codes of conduct, and draft consultations across the EU digital stack.",
"version": "2026-06-09",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/legal-analysis-forge-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "mandatory-verification-larissa-meredith-flister",
"source": "./",
"description": "Mandatory external verification workflow for ALL non-trivial factual claims before presenting them as true. This skill MUST be used whenever Claude is asked to research any topic, answer factual questions, provide current information, draft documents containing factual claims, give legal advice or cite legal authority, discuss current events or public figures, provide technical or scientific information, state statistics or data points, or answer ANY question where the answer could have changed over time. Also trigger when the user asks Claude to 'check', 'verify', 'confirm', 'research', 'look up', or 'find out' anything, or when the user needs information that requires freshness, precision, or source accuracy. This skill overrides any default tendency to answer from memory. If a task involves stating facts, citing sources, or providing current information — use this skill.",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/mandatory-verification-larissa-meredith-flister"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "multi-jurisdictional-research-zacharie-laik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Multi-jurisdictional legal research and risk assessment using the Legal Data Hunter MCP (40+ countries, 13M+ documents). Use when the user asks about law across multiple countries, comparative law, cross-border regulatory analysis, or case law/legislation in any European or other covered jurisdiction. Triggers on jurisdictional comparison, cross-border risk, multi-country compliance, GDPR enforcement across member states, or Legal Data Hunter references. Also handles single non-French jurisdiction research. For French-only law, prefer goodlegal-research.",
"version": "2026-04-10",
"author": {
"name": "Zacharie Laïk"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/multi-jurisdictional-research-zacharie-laik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "proposition-audit-anthony-searle",
"source": "./",
"description": "Post-hoc verification and trust audit of AI-generated factual and interpretive claims. Classifies claims by type and salience, routes them to domain-appropriate sources, scores trustworthiness on a tiered scale with an Interpolated verdict for plausible-but-unsupported detail, and assesses rhetorical fairness on interpretive claims. Designed with a focus on healthcare law in England and Wales, but with general applicability beyond.",
"version": "2026-05-31",
"author": {
"name": "Anthony Searle"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/proposition-audit-anthony-searle"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "raisonnement-juridique-amaury-fouret",
"source": "./",
"description": "Modélise le raisonnement juridique d'un magistrat français pour l'analyse de dossiers civils. Utiliser ce skill pour analyser un litige et identifier les questions juridiques, construire un raisonnement juridique structuré (syllogisme), rédiger une motivation de jugement civil, rechercher la jurisprudence et les textes applicables via Judilibre et Légifrance, qualifier juridiquement des faits et actes, distinguer prétentions, moyens et arguments. Basé sur les Fiches méthodologiques de rédaction du jugement civil (ENM/Cour de cassation, 2023).",
"version": "2026-05-05",
"author": {
"name": "Amaury Fouret"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/raisonnement-juridique-amaury-fouret"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "recherche-doctrine-allison-fiorentino",
"source": "./",
"description": "Recherche académique dans les bases de données de doctrine juridique française, européenne et internationale. Utiliser cette skill lorsque l'utilisateur demande de rechercher des articles de doctrine, des thèses, des ouvrages académiques, ou des travaux universitaires en droit — y compris en droit comparé. Sources principales : ISIDORE (agrégateur SHS du CNRS incluant Cairn.info, Persée, OpenEdition), HAL (archive ouverte française), OpenAlex (base ouverte mondiale 250M+ travaux), Semantic Scholar, CrossRef, Persée (OAI direct), et CORE. Couvre la doctrine juridique francophone ET internationale avec workflow bilingue intégré pour le droit comparé. Déclencher aussi pour : bibliographie commentée, état de l'art, revue de littérature juridique, recherche d'auteur, vérification de citation, analyse bibliométrique.",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/recherche-doctrine-allison-fiorentino"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "recherche-jurisprudence-allison-fiorentino",
"source": "./",
"description": "Ce skill donne accès à l'API de judilibre. Vous formulez votre demande en français, il interroge la base Judlibre et renvoie les réponses. Attention le skill ne fonctionne que si des domaines supplémentaires sont utilisés et que l'utilisateur a rentré sa propre clé Judlibre. Ce skill et son auteur n'ont aucun lien avec la Cour de cassation ou Judilibre.",
"version": "2026-06-25",
"author": {
"name": "Allison Fiorentino"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/recherche-jurisprudence-allison-fiorentino"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "recherche-jurisprudence-librejustice",
"source": "./",
"description": "Gratuit et open source, cette compétence fait chercher, vérifier et citer la jurisprudence française et européenne à votre assistant, sur les ~3,8 millions de décisions de LibreJustice. Sa règle première : aucune décision n'entre dans la réponse sans avoir été lue en texte intégral, jamais sur la foi d'un résumé. Les citations sont verbatim et tracées à leur source, chaque décision nommée est un lien, et le sort de la décision sur recours est affiché avant qu'elle soit invoquée comme autorité. Cour de cassation, Conseil d'État, cours d'appel, tribunaux judiciaires et administratifs, Conseil constitutionnel, CNIL, CEDH, CJUE et CNDA (seulement les décisions publiques). Le connecteur LibreJustice est nécessaire ; la compétence guide son installation.",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/recherche-jurisprudence-librejustice"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "recherche-normes-librejustice",
"source": "./",
"description": "Gratuit et open source, cette compétence trouve et cite le texte applicable à la date qui compte, sur les ~3,7 millions d'articles de LibreJustice. La date d'abord, le texte ensuite : la version en vigueur aujourd'hui est la mauvaise pour la plupart des contentieux, donc elle identifie la date pertinente, sert la version valide à cette date et dit laquelle elle cite. Aucune disposition n'est citée de mémoire, chaque article est lié à sa page. Codes et lois français, droit de l'Union, traités et accords bilatéraux, codes de 59 pays étrangers, conventions collectives, BOFiP, circulaires. Le connecteur LibreJustice est nécessaire ; la compétence guide son installation.",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/recherche-normes-librejustice"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "recherche-theses-allison-fiorentino",
"source": "./",
"description": "Recherche, cartographie et analyse des thèses de doctorat françaises via theses.fr (API ABES) et TEL (HAL). Spécialisée droit avec filtrage par sous-disciplines juridiques. Ouverte sur d'autres domaines universitaires. Capacités : (1) recherche multi-critères — sujet, directeur, jury, établissement, école doctorale, période, statut soutenue/en préparation, discipline ; (2) cartographie académique — qui dirige sur quel sujet, qui siège dans quels jurys, réseaux de co-direction, écoles doctorales productives ; (3) analyses temporelles — évolution d'un sujet, détection de saturation, calendrier des soutenances à venir ; (4) filtrage sous-discipline juridique — droit privé, public, social, affaires, international, etc. Déclencher dès que l'utilisateur mentionne thèse, doctorat, directeur de thèse, jury de thèse, école doctorale, soutenance, doctorant, ou demande une analyse d'écosystème doctoral. Pour articles ou ouvrages de doctrine, utiliser plutôt recherche-doctrine.",
"version": "2026-05-14",
"author": {
"name": "Allison Fiorentino"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/recherche-theses-allison-fiorentino"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "red-team-verifier-patrick-munro",
"source": "./",
"description": "Adversarial verification for AI-generated legal content with systematic fact-checking, source validation, and quality control. Use when verifying legal documents, fact-checking regulatory content, performing red team review, or quality assurance before distribution to clients or stakeholders.",
"version": "2026-04-25",
"author": {
"name": "Patrick Munro"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/red-team-verifier-patrick-munro"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "ricerca-giuridica-it-silvio-mistretta",
"source": "./",
"description": "Skill for legal research on Italian and EU sources: legislation, administrative practice, and case law. Encode a working method, not an opinion: routing to official sources, citations with verifiable references, validity checks including ratione temporis, query minimization for contexts covered by professional secrecy, and concise output by default. The Agent Skills format is an open standard: the skill was created for Claude (claude.ai, Desktop, Cowork, Claude Code) and is reusable in tools that adopt the same format.",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/ricerca-giuridica-it-silvio-mistretta"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "statute-analyzer-rafal-fryc",
"source": "./",
"description": "Guide for reading, interpreting, and applying statutes, regulations, and rules in legal and compliance contexts. Use when the user asks about (1) how to read and interpret statutes, regulations, or rules, (2) statutory interpretation methods and canons of construction, (3) understanding legislative intent, (4) applying statutes to specific legal situations, (5) extracting requirements from legal text, (6) distinguishing between different types of legal requirements, or (7) cross-jurisdictional compliance analysis.",
"author": {
"name": "Rafal Stanislaw Fryc"
},
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/statute-analyzer-rafal-fryc"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "swiss-legal-source-and-authority-triage-enrique-g-zbinden",
"source": "./",
"description": "Swiss legal source and authority triage. Use when a user asks a Swiss legal, regulatory, compliance, contract, employment, corporate, litigation, IP, tax, privacy, public-law, fintech, register, or cantonal-law question; when Swiss law may apply; or when an AI legal answer needs source routing across federal, cantonal, communal, regulator, register, contractual, professional, soft-law, multilingual, or open-data layers.",
"version": "2026-05-16",
"author": {
"name": "Enrique G. Zbinden"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/swiss-legal-source-and-authority-triage-enrique-g-zbinden"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "uk-citation-verification-matei-clej",
"source": "./",
"description": "Verifies UK case-law citations, pinpoint references and quotations against the official public register — The National Archives' Find Case Law — and statutory references against legislation.gov.uk, before a document that cites them is relied on, served or filed. Every check returns a graded verdict: VERIFIED, MISMATCH (the citation resolves to a different case — the classic AI miscitation), NOT ON REGISTER, OUTSIDE COVERAGE (the register cannot answer — absence proves nothing), or UNCHECKABLE (a law-report citation). The grading exists because there are two ways to get this wrong: citing a case that does not exist, and accusing a real case of not existing. Use when asked to check citations, verify a case exists, confirm a quotation is verbatim, check a pinpoint paragraph, audit a draft's authorities, screen a document for hallucinated cases, or check a statutory provision is in force. Not a substitute for reading the judgment: existence is not authority.",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/uk-citation-verification-matei-clej"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "verifica-fonti-michele-loi",
"source": "./",
"description": "Checks the formal coherence and plausibility of Italian and EU legal citations (statutes, case law) in text produced by Claude or other legal-AI skills. Reports clause-by-clause on what is well-formed, suspicious, or unresolvable against real norms, covering Cassazione, Corte Costituzionale, Consiglio di Stato, TAR, Normattiva, EUR-Lex, Garante Privacy, AGCM, ANAC. Minimal-surface variant: no proprietary backend fetch, allowlist limited to official Italian and EU institutional registries.",
"category": "Legal Research",
"skills": [
"./skills/verifica-fonti-michele-loi"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "ambiguity-stress-test-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Adversarially stress-tests a legal text — a contract, statute, regulation, or judicial opinion — for interpretive ambiguity: it finds the seams where the people governed by it will later disagree about what it means and turns each into a concrete dispute scenario with both sides' arguments, the likely outcome, and a fix. Use it whenever someone wants to pressure-test, red-team, audit, or find weak spots, loopholes, gaps, ambiguities, or drafting problems in a legal document; whenever a drafter wants to tighten a contract, statute, regulation, or opinion before it issues; whenever a litigator wants to mine an opinion or contract for arguments; or whenever someone hands over a legal text and asks where it will be fought over or for issue-spotting. Trigger it for contract review, statutory-ambiguity analysis, judicial-opinion scope analysis, and drafting QA — even if the user never says \"stress-test\" or \"ambiguity.\"",
"version": "2026-07-29",
"author": {
"name": "Seth J. Chandler"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/ambiguity-stress-test-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "assignation-refere-recouvrement-creance-selim-brihi",
"source": "./",
"description": "Rédaction d'assignations en référé devant le tribunal de commerce ou des activités économiques pour le recouvrement de créances commerciales. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger, préparer ou créer une assignation en référé pour obtenir le paiement d'une créance impayée (factures, prestations de services, ventes de marchandises, etc.) lorsque le débiteur n'a pas honoré ses obligations de paiement et qu'il n'existe pas de contestation sérieuse.",
"version": "2026.01.23",
"author": {
"name": "Sélim Brihi"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/assignation-refere-recouvrement-creance-selim-brihi"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "chronology-builder-andrew-bird",
"source": "./",
"description": "Builds a litigation chronology from the disclosure bundle itself — every entry attributed to its source document, behind a CPR 31.22 implied-undertaking check, because documents disclosed in English proceedings may only be used for those proceedings. Adds a privilege screen and case-theory significance tagging, so the output is court-facing work product, not a loose timeline. Use when the user asks to build a chronology or timeline from a disclosure bundle, a matter file, or witness statements, or says 'build the chron', 'what happened when', or needs a Statement of Facts ready timeline.",
"version": "2026-06-12",
"author": {
"name": "Andrew Bird"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/chronology-builder-andrew-bird"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "client-instruction-schedule-serhan-handani-fx44146u",
"source": "./",
"description": "Build a client instruction schedule: a plain-English, Scott Schedule-style Word table that gathers a struggling client's evidence and instructions issue by issue, with a one-page covering note. Output is always a .docx draft for solicitor review.",
"author": {
"name": "Serhan Handani"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/client-instruction-schedule-serhan-handani-fx44146u"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "cpr-letter-drafter-andrew-bird",
"source": "./",
"description": "Writes the formal letter you send before suing someone in a civil case in England & Wales — the Letter Before Claim that starts the pre-action clock. The part it gets right is which pre-action protocol applies — debt, professional negligence, housing disrepair, personal injury, or the default Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct — each of which has its own rules a generic letter misses (the 30-day debt window, the professional-negligence preliminary-notice step). It also flags the limitation deadline for a solicitor to confirm rather than stating it as fact. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small firms without a precedent to copy. Use when the user says 'draft an LBC', 'letter before claim', 'pre-action letter', 'pre-action protocol', or needs to start the pre-action clock before issuing a civil claim. Verify the current protocol before sending.",
"version": "2026-06-09",
"author": {
"name": "Andrew Bird"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/cpr-letter-drafter-andrew-bird"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "disclosure-list-andrew-bird",
"source": "./",
"description": "Works out which documents you have to hand over to the other side in a civil case in England & Wales, and builds the formal list. The part it gets right that trips people up is which disclosure regime applies — Practice Direction 57AD (the Disclosure Pilot, now permanent in the Business and Property Courts, with its Models A–E) or standard disclosure under CPR Part 31 everywhere else. It picks the regime, chooses a Model per issue, structures the Disclosure Review Document, and drafts the disclosure certificate for the party to sign personally. Built for litigation juniors, in-house counsel, and small teams without a precedent bank. Use when the user says 'disclosure list', 'PD 57AD', 'Model C', 'extended disclosure', 'List of Documents', 'N265', or needs to work out what must be disclosed.",
"version": "2026-06-09",
"author": {
"name": "Andrew Bird"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/disclosure-list-andrew-bird"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "disclosure-strategy-mapper-larissa-meredith-flister",
"source": "./",
"description": "This skill maps disclosure strategy from a case summary, pleading, chronology, or early case theory: the document categories that will matter, likely custodians, adverse material, evidential gaps, search themes, and the risks worth confronting early.",
"version": "2026-06-11",
"author": {
"name": "Larissa Meredith-Flister"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/disclosure-strategy-mapper-larissa-meredith-flister"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "isds-arbitrators-cameron-russell",
"source": "./",
"description": "Arbitrator research tool for investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS), built for arbitration counsel. It produces reliable, structured, and thorough insights into arbitrators' experience, and can identify, evaluate, and rank the suitability of arbitrators for specific disputes. The tool flags arbitrator decisions and publications that bear on the issues in the dispute, checks an arbitrator's caseload, and suggests additional issues for counsel's consideration prior to nomination. Try asking about specific arbitrators, or describe your dispute and ask for a shortlist of suitable arbitrator candidates. Outputs are grounded in the UNCTAD ISDS Navigator dataset, targeted live lookups (ICSID), and additional verification from primary sources. For best functionality, also download the isds-research skill.",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/isds-arbitrators-cameron-russell"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "isds-research-cameron-russell",
"source": "./",
"description": "Compliant, retrieval-grounded research over investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) awards and decisions. Use when the user asks about ICSID / investment-treaty arbitration cases, awards, or doctrines (fair and equitable treatment, expropriation, jurisdiction, costs, annulment, etc.) and wants answers grounded in the actual document text with pinpoint citations. Identifies the correct document on the case page, confirms it against the PDF's own first pages, retrieves primary documents on demand from ICSID, PCA, etc., never scrapes or hosts a corpus in violation of applicable terms, and cites only retrieved text.",
"license": "AGPL-3.0-only",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/isds-research-cameron-russell"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "judicial-first-impression-larissa-meredith-flister",
"source": "./",
"description": "Assesses a legal argument, submission, or piece of structured reasoning from the perspective of a judge reading it cold under time pressure. Produces a structured seven-part assessment: what the case appears to be about, immediate points of confusion, what feels strong, what feels weak, what is assumed but unproved, a provisional confidence level (low/medium/high), and what would be needed to persuade. The skill does not rewrite, improve, or attack the argument — it tells you how it actually lands on a sceptical, experienced reader with no prior context. Works on skeleton arguments, witness statements, letters before action, position statements, academic articles, and non-legal structured reasoning.",
"version": "2026-04-15",
"author": {
"name": "Larissa Meredith-Flister"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/judicial-first-impression-larissa-meredith-flister"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "litigacion-latam-joselyne-garcia-montesdeoca",
"source": "./",
"description": "Asesor experto en litigación civil latinoamericana bajo sistemas de derecho civil. Está diseñado para asistir a abogados litigantes, equipos legales internos y clientes directos con estrategia procesal, análisis de riesgos y orientación sobre el proceso civil en América Latina. Al final de cada sesión redacta un correo electrónico claro que resume los hallazgos para el cliente. Cinco modos de operación: 1) Estrategia: cómo enfocar el litigio, qué vía procesal elegir, cómo construir la posición del cliente. 2) Riesgo: evaluar viabilidad, probabilidades de éxito, prescripción, caducidad. 3) Proceso: etapas del proceso, plazos, recursos disponibles, pasos inmediatos. 4) Asesoría cliente: explicaciones claras para clientes. 5) Email al cliente: borrador automático de email al final de cualquier análisis.",
"version": "2026-06-22",
"author": {
"name": "Joselyne García Montesdeoca"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/litigacion-latam-joselyne-garcia-montesdeoca"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "litigation-deadline-calendar-dave-marcus",
"source": "./",
"description": "A plugin for calendaring litigation and arbitration deadlines from scheduling orders. Scans scheduling orders and outputs in a calendar file for Outlook or Google Calendar. Also permits inviting other team members via calendar invites.",
"version": "2026-05-12",
"author": {
"name": "Dave Marcus"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/litigation-deadline-calendar-dave-marcus"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "mediation-dispute-analysis-jinzhe-tan",
"source": "./",
"description": "Analyzes legal disputes for mediation purposes — reviewing case materials (pleadings, contracts, correspondence, evidence), identifying contested issues, summarizing each party's position and interests, performing legal analysis of key issues, proposing mediation strategies or settlement directions, and preparing for mediation sessions. Use this skill whenever the user mentions mediation, dispute analysis, settlement, ADR, dispute resolution, party positions, caucus strategy, or asks to analyze a conflict between two or more parties with a resolution-oriented (rather than litigation-oriented) goal — including when they upload case files and ask for a structured breakdown of who wants what or how the case might settle, even when they don't explicitly say \"mediation\".",
"version": "2026.02.27",
"author": {
"name": "Jinzhe Tan"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/mediation-dispute-analysis-jinzhe-tan"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "opposing-counsel-review-larissa-meredith-flister",
"source": "./",
"description": "Act as experienced opposing counsel to attack, undermine, and expose weaknesses in a legal argument, submission, witness statement, or structured reasoning. Produces a six-part adversarial analysis: 1. A core theory of attack identifying the single most effective way to defeat the argument; 2. A reconstructed version of the opposing argument stripped of rhetoric to expose its fragility; 3. Primary lines of attack grouped by category (legal misstatement, evidential gaps, causation failures, internal inconsistency, over-reliance on assertion, procedural weakness); 4. An \"if I were the judge\" section showing how a sceptical tribunal would dismantle the argument; 5. Surgical strikes - 3 to 5 high-impact points ready for oral submissions; and 6. An analysis of what the argument is trying to hide. Written in formal, adversarial British English for a legally trained audience.",
"version": "2026-04-26",
"author": {
"name": "Larissa Meredith-Flister"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/opposing-counsel-review-larissa-meredith-flister"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "pleading-injection-guard-matei-clej",
"source": "./",
"description": "Detects prompt injection hidden in documents from the other side (pleadings, skeletons, bundles, served evidence, opponents' emails and attachments) before an AI reads them, so the model is not turned against your client. Checks word by word that the text an extractor hands the model was visibly drawn on the page: white, near-white, covered, clipped, off-page, tiny, transparent and invisible-mode text in PDF (ink test plus OCR); Word formatting resolved as Word does (styles, shading, theme colours, scaling, off-page frames, fallbacks, unused headers); HTML/CSS, RTF, email with attachments and zips, xlsx/pptx and legacy formats. Flags Unicode smuggling, text addressed to an AI and authorities found only in hidden text. Fails closed. Optional Read-tool hook. Use BEFORE any AI summary or analysis of an opposing or third-party document. Triggers: 'scan for injection', 'is this document safe', 'check the other side's skeleton', 'injection guard'.",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/pleading-injection-guard-matei-clej"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "pre-motion-andrew-bird",
"source": "./",
"description": "Adversarial premortem for England & Wales civil litigation - builds the strongest version of a case, then attacks it from four angles to find where it loses before opposing counsel does. Runs an adversarial premortem on a UK litigation matter. Builds the strongest version of the case, then attacks it from four angles — procedural, substantive, evidentiary, strategic — to find where it actually loses. Returns a ranked stress-test brief: failure scenarios, evidence inconsistencies, blind spots, mitigations, and one brutal one-sentence verdict. Use before issue, before settlement negotiations, before a litigation-funder pitch, or before deciding whether to take a case.",
"version": "2026-06-05",
"author": {
"name": "Andrew Bird"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/pre-motion-andrew-bird"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "requete-cph-licenciement-faute-grave-selim-brihi",
"source": "./",
"description": "Rédaction de requêtes devant le Conseil de prud'hommes pour contester un licenciement pour faute grave. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger une requête CPH, contester un licenciement pour faute grave, préparer une saisine du CPH pour un litige lié à un licenciement, ou créer un document de contestation de licenciement en droit du travail français.",
"version": "2026.01.23",
"author": {
"name": "Sélim Brihi"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/requete-cph-licenciement-faute-grave-selim-brihi"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "settlement-pressure-tester-larissa-meredith-flister",
"source": "./",
"description": "This skill stress-tests a proposed settlement position before an offer goes out or comes back: the assumptions it depends on, your leverage and the opponent’s, the evidential weaknesses, the likely opponent response, and the timing and costs pressures around it. It structures settlement judgment for a better-informed decision; it does not advise whether to settle.",
"version": "2026-06-11",
"author": {
"name": "Larissa Meredith-Flister"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/settlement-pressure-tester-larissa-meredith-flister"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "sustainable-opposing-counsel-review-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Produces an adversarial attack on a legal argument that survives reply. Runs the opposing-counsel discipline twice: an unrestrained first pass, then the same instrument turned on that pass to cut every point that collapses under challenge - attacks on facts your own side has conceded, objections belonging to the wrong forum, speculation about documents and motives, gotchas with innocent explanations, overclaims, self-refuting assertions, and padding. The deliverable is one standalone attack containing only what can be defended, capped at five heads, not a discussion of the discarded draft. Use to attack, stress-test, red-team or rebut a submission, brief, motion, witness statement, letter or piece of structured legal reasoning when the output must be something you could stand up and say. Also use when an earlier adversarial review came back overlong, scattershot or padded with points you do not trust. Derived from Opposing Counsel Review by Larissa Meredith-Flister (Apache-2.0). Formal British English.",
"version": "2026-07-29",
"author": {
"name": "Seth J. Chandler"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/sustainable-opposing-counsel-review-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "without-prejudice-drafter-andrew-bird",
"source": "./",
"description": "Writes a settlement letter on the right footing — and warns you when marking it 'without prejudice' won't actually keep it out of court. A genuine settlement letter is normally protected (the judge can't see it), but only if the substance is a real attempt to settle, and even then there are exceptions. The skill picks the correct footing — without prejudice (WP), without prejudice save as to costs (WPSATC / Calderbank), or open — drafts the finished letter, and surfaces the Unilever v Procter & Gamble exceptions that get WP material admitted despite the label, which a plain template won't flag. Built for juniors and in-house counsel drafting a settlement or Calderbank offer who need the footing right the first time. Use when the user asks to draft a WP letter, a Calderbank, a settlement letter, or wants to know whether material is likely protected from disclosure.",
"version": "2026-06-09",
"author": {
"name": "Andrew Bird"
},
"license": "MIT",
"category": "Litigation",
"skills": [
"./skills/without-prejudice-drafter-andrew-bird"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "nil-contract-reviewer-samir-patel",
"source": "./",
"description": "NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) contract analysis for NCAA student-athletes from the athlete's perspective. Use when user says 'review this NIL contract', 'analyze this NIL deal', 'check this athlete agreement', 'review my NIL agreement', or uploads a PDF NIL contract for review. Identifies red flags, missing protections, and compliance issues. Produces a structured review memorandum with negotiation positions. Do NOT use for general contract review, employment agreements, non-NIL endorsements, or brand-side deal analysis.",
"version": "2026.03.02",
"author": {
"name": "Samir Patel"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Media Entertainment Sports",
"skills": [
"./skills/nil-contract-reviewer-samir-patel"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "excel-editor-openai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Toolkit for comprehensive Spreadsheet reading, creation, editing, and analysis with visual quality control. Use to work with spreadsheets (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv) for: (1) Creating new spreadsheets with formulas and formatting, (2) Reading or analyzing tabular data, (3) Modifying existing spreadsheets while preserving formulas, (4) Building financial models with proper formatting, (5) Data visualization with in-sheet charts, or any other spreadsheet tasks.",
"version": "2026.01.30",
"author": {
"name": "OpenAI"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Microsoft Office",
"skills": [
"./skills/excel-editor-openai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "normalisation-juridique-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz",
"source": "./",
"description": "La compétence Normalisation juridique FR nettoie un document Word rédigé en français juridique. Elle distingue deux régimes : les corrections déterministes (apostrophes courbes, guillemets français, espaces insécables, insécables des références — art. 1240, n° 21-12.345, 50 % —, ordinaux 1ère → 1re, ligatures œ, la loi dispose et non stipule, anglicismes-calques), appliquées directement ; et les réécritures de jugement (virgule avant « et », ternaires creux, formules emphatiques, harmonisations), posées en révisions Word soumises à votre acceptation. Chaque changement est consigné et restitué en tableau récapitulatif : on revient en arrière mot à mot — « défais 3, 7-10 ». La normalisation des citations reste purement formelle. Fonctionne en Cowork ou sur fichier Word.",
"version": "2026-06-18",
"author": {
"name": "Christophe Quézel-Ambrunaz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Microsoft Office",
"skills": [
"./skills/normalisation-juridique-christophe-quezel-ambrunaz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "outlook-malik-taiar",
"source": "./",
"description": "Read, search, and download emails and attachments from Microsoft Outlook via OAuth2. Use when the user asks to check, read, or fetch emails, search by keyword or sender, download attachments, or chain email content into other skills.",
"version": "2026.02.02",
"author": {
"name": "Malik Taiar (Lawvable)"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Microsoft Office",
"skills": [
"./skills/outlook-malik-taiar"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "word-editor-antoine-louis",
"source": "./",
"description": "Edit, query, and transform Word documents (.docx) with the SuperDoc CLI. Use when the user asks to read, search, modify, format, comment, track changes, or review changes in .docx files. Triggers on any task involving Word documents — text replacement, redlining, contract markup, template filling, bulk edits, content extraction, or document review.",
"version": "2026-04-10",
"author": {
"name": "Dr. Antoine Louis"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Microsoft Office",
"skills": [
"./skills/word-editor-antoine-louis"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "word-editor-openai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Toolkit for comprehensive document reading and creation with visual quality control. Use to work with Word documents (.docx files) for: (1) Reading or extracting content from existing DOCX files, (2) Creating new Word documents with professional formatting, (3) Editing documents requiring precise typography and layout, or any other DOCX reading or generation tasks.",
"version": "2026.01.30",
"author": {
"name": "OpenAI"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Microsoft Office",
"skills": [
"./skills/word-editor-openai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "word-editor-superdoc",
"source": "./",
"description": "Searches, replaces, and reads text in Word documents from the command line. Use when the user asks to edit, search, or extract text from .docx files.",
"version": "2026.03.18",
"author": {
"name": "Superdoc"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Microsoft Office",
"skills": [
"./skills/word-editor-superdoc"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "fedramp-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP Certification Classes (A, B, C, D — new baseline labels: A = pilot/transitional, B = LI-SaaS/Low, C = Moderate, D = High, per NTC-0004), FedRAMP 20x (now the primary authorization pathway), OSCAL mandate (September 2026), 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. FedRAMP Ready retires July 28, 2026. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring.",
"category": "Public Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/fedramp-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "ism-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert Australian Information Security Manual (ISM) advisor for government entities and their supply chains. Use for ISM control selection, gap analysis, system authorisation, IRAP assessment preparation, security documentation, and ASD compliance. Triggers on: ISM controls, ASD compliance, IRAP assessment, PROTECTED system scoping, Essential Eight vs ISM, system authorisation, NC/OS/ PROTECTED/SECRET/TOP SECRET classification markings, security objectives, ISM guidelines or chapters, control applicability markings, cybersecurity documentation for Australian government, and any question about the ASD Information Security Manual framework or Australian government cybersecurity obligations.",
"category": "Public Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/ism-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "nist-800-53-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 compliance advisor — all 20 control families (AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR), Low/Moderate/High baseline selection, FIPS 199/200 system categorization, control tailoring and overlays, privacy controls (PT family), supply chain risk management (SR family), assessment procedures (SP 800-53A), OSCAL, RMF integration (SP 800-37), and mapping to FedRAMP, FISMA, CMMC 2.0, and ISO 27001. Use for any federal system security controls, FISMA compliance, RMF step guidance, control narrative writing, or baseline tailoring question.",
"category": "Public Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/nist-800-53-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "nzism-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) advisor for NZ government agencies and their supply chains. Use for NZISM control guidance, gap analysis, agency security obligations, classification framework (Unclassified through Top Secret), security risk management, system certification, and GCSB/NCSC NZ compliance. Triggers on: NZISM controls, NZ government security, GCSB compliance, agency cybersecurity obligations, NZ classification markings, Restricted/Confidential/Secret system scoping, agency security policies, third-party supplier security, Certification and Accreditation (C&A), and any question about NZ government information security requirements or the NZISM framework.",
"category": "Public Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/nzism-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "section-508-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert Section 508 compliance advisor for US federal ICT accessibility. Use this skill whenever a user asks about Section 508, WCAG 2.0/2.1 AA for federal systems, VPAT or Accessibility Conformance Reports (ACR), accessibility audits, remediation planning, PDF accessibility, web or software accessibility, mobile accessibility, federal procurement accessibility requirements, contractor obligations, undue burden exceptions, assistive technology compatibility, or Section 508 testing. Covers the Revised Section 508 Standards (2018), all WCAG 2.0 Level AA success criteria, the four POUR principles, testing methodologies, and agency compliance workflows.",
"category": "Public Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/section-508-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "law-expertise-to-skill-adrian-lerer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Turn a lawyer's bounded expertise, workflow, review standard, or legal judgment pattern into a safe, inspectable legal AI skill. Use when a user provides legal memos, comments, checklists, negotiation notes, review habits, compliance playbooks, or professional feedback and wants a reusable Lawve-style skill. Do not impersonate the lawyer or claim to reproduce a person; distill only authorized, source-bounded capability.",
"version": "2026-06-01",
"author": {
"name": "Ignacio Adrián Lerer"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Skill Authoring",
"skills": [
"./skills/law-expertise-to-skill-adrian-lerer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "lawve-prep-seth-chandler",
"source": "./",
"description": "Takes a skill — a .skill or .zip archive, a bare SKILL.md, a folder, or just a raw idea — and produces a package ready for public distribution on lawve.ai, plus the exact entries for the submission form. Runs a gate first: skills with no plausible legal use, unsafe code, or licensing bars are declined with reasons, and general-purpose skills that could serve legal work are offered a legal adaptation instead. Then applies the standard compliance transforms — structure, metadata, attribution, dependency ladders, orphaned-file repair, limitations disclosure — validates the result, and delivers a zip. Raw ideas are gated first, built (via skill-creator where available), then adapted. Use for \"make this Lawve-compliant,\" \"prep this skill for Lawve,\" \"package for lawve.ai,\" \"is this suitable for Lawve,\" \"get my skill ready to publish,\" or any request to ready a skill for the Lawve catalogue.",
"category": "Skill Authoring",
"skills": [
"./skills/lawve-prep-seth-chandler"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "skill-creation-openai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Guide for creating effective skills. Use when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends the model's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.",
"version": "2026.02.09",
"author": {
"name": "OpenAI"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Skill Authoring",
"skills": [
"./skills/skill-creation-openai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "skill-improvement-malik-taiar",
"source": "./",
"description": "Guide to analyze a current work session and propose improvements to skills. Use (1) automatically after working with a skill to capture learnings, (2) when the user suggests improvements, corrections, or additions during a skill-related session, or (3) when the user manually invokes `self-improve`.",
"version": "2026.01.07",
"author": {
"name": "Malik Taiar (Lawvable)"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Skill Authoring",
"skills": [
"./skills/skill-improvement-malik-taiar"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "skill-injection-defense-adrian-lerer",
"source": "./",
"description": "Audits legal AI skills, prompts, workflows, MCP/tool instructions, and agent packages before they are trusted or installed. It detects prompt injection, hidden or hostile instructions, unsafe scripts, suspicious frontmatter, credential exposure, exfiltration paths, persistence mechanisms, cron/launchd hooks, unauthorized network calls, and supply-chain risk. Use it before adopting third-party or generated skills; before publishing a skill to a legal AI marketplace; when reviewing SKILL.md files, skill folders, scripts, references, MCP manifests, or automation instructions; or when a user asks whether an AI workflow is safe. Paste or upload the skill, prompt, MCP/tool instruction, etc you want to review. The auditor treats the material as untrusted data: it does not execute scripts, install packages, or obey commands embedded inside the reviewed content. It returns a verdict — approve, approve with constraints, rewrite, quarantine, or reject — plus the key risks and recommended remediation.",
"category": "Skill Authoring",
"skills": [
"./skills/skill-injection-defense-adrian-lerer"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "skill-security-auditor-lawve",
"source": "./",
"description": "Audit an AI agent skill before installing it. Use proactively whenever the user is about to add, install, enable, or evaluate an unfamiliar skill — including phrases like \"audit this skill\", \"is this skill safe\", \"scan skill before install\", \"check skill for malicious code\", \"review this plugin\", or any pre-install gate on an untrusted, third-party, or community-distributed skill bundle. Runs ten categories of static checks (code execution, network exfiltration, credential harvesting, persistence, prompt injection, supply-chain hooks, obfuscation, destructive filesystem ops, secrets, Trojan Source / homoglyphs) and emits a PASS / WARN / FAIL verdict.",
"version": "2026-05-12",
"author": {
"name": "Dr. Antoine Louis"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Skill Authoring",
"skills": [
"./skills/skill-security-auditor-lawve"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "az-eu-website-privacy-audit-mirza-chiragov",
"source": "./",
"description": "Audits a website for compliance with Azerbaijan's Law on Personal Data No. 998-IIIQ and, where applicable, EU GDPR plus ePrivacy/cookie consent rules. Inventories the privacy documents present (privacy policy, cookie policy, cookie banner, consent flow, controller and DPO contact, data subject rights channel, cross-border transfer disclosures, AZ operator-registration references) and scores each against the applicable statutory requirements. Produces a dual-layer report: a plain-language traffic-light summary for business owners plus a clause-by-clause findings table with article-level citations for lawyers. Assessment-only, no drafting. Use whenever the user shares a URL or privacy/cookie policy text for an AZ-based or AZ-targeted site; also when the user mentions an .az domain, Law 998, the AZ State Register, ePrivacy, an Art. 27 EU representative, or asks \"is my site GDPR compliant\", \"do I need to register as an operator in Azerbaijan\", or \"is our cookie banner lawful\" even without the word \"audit\".",
"version": "2026-05-13",
"author": {
"name": "Mirza Chiragov"
},
"license": "CC-BY-4.0",
"category": "Technology Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/az-eu-website-privacy-audit-mirza-chiragov"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "cis-controls-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert CIS Controls v8 (CIS Top 18) advisor — implementation group scoping (IG1/IG2/IG3), control gap assessments, safeguard-level guidance, asset inventory, software inventory, data protection, secure configuration, account management, access control, continuous vulnerability management, audit log management, email and web browser protections, malware defenses, network infrastructure management, network monitoring and defense, application software security, incident response, penetration testing, and CIS Controls mapping to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and CMMC. Use for any question about CIS Controls, CIS Benchmarks, Implementation Groups, or prioritized cyber hygiene for any organization size.",
"category": "Technology Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/cis-controls-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-ai-act-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5, including the nudification/CSAM prohibition from Dec 2, 2026), all 8 Annex III high-risk use case areas, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations including the July 2025 Code of Practice (Arts. 51–55), conformity assessment and CE marking (Arts. 43–48), EU AI database registration, Art. 50 transparency (chatbots, synthetic media, AI-generated content), governance (AI Office, AI Board), penalties (Art. 99), confirmed phase-in timeline (Digital Omnibus adopted June 29, 2026: Annex III deferred to Dec 2, 2027; Annex I to Aug 2, 2028), and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and GDPR. Use for any EU AI regulation, AI system classification, or AI compliance question. Current as of July 2026. GPAI enforcement powers activate August 2, 2026.",
"category": "Technology Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-ai-act-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-cra-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 — mandatory cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for all products with digital elements (PDEs) sold in the EU. Use this skill for gap analysis, product classification (Default / Class I / Class II), conformity assessment route selection, CE marking, SBOM requirements, vulnerability and incident reporting to ENISA/CSIRTs, support period obligations, and manufacturer/importer/distributor duties. Trigger for EU CRA, Cyber Resilience Act, PDE compliance, Annex I requirements, SBOM EU, CE marking cybersecurity, or connected product security EU.",
"category": "Technology Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-cra-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "eu-data-act-oliver-schmidt-prietz",
"source": "./",
"description": "Practitioner skill for EU Regulation 2023/2854 (Data Act). Covers Chapters II-VII (IoT data access, mandatory B2B sharing, unfair contract terms, public-sector exceptional need, cloud switching, third-country governmental access) and Chapter VIII (interoperability and smart contracts, gate-only). Use when the user asks about Data Act rights or obligations, drafts a Data Act notice or letter, reviews a data-sharing or cloud-switching contract under the Data Act, runs a Data Act gap analysis, or asks how the Data Act interacts with GDPR, the DMA, the Trade Secrets Directive, or sectoral law. Triggers include \"Data Act\", \"Datengesetz\", \"Regulation (EU) 2023/2854\", \"Art. 4(1) request\", \"Art. 5(1) third-party request\", \"trade-secret handbrake\", \"cloud switching obligations\", \"Chapter VI\", \"Ch V exceptional need\", and references to specific Data Act articles or recitals.",
"version": "2026-06-11",
"author": {
"name": "Oliver Schmidt-Prietz"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Technology Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/eu-data-act-oliver-schmidt-prietz"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "iso42001-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert ISO 42001 AI Management System (AIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 42001:2023, AI governance, AI management systems, AI risk assessment, AI system impact assessment, Annex A controls for AI, Statement of Applicability for AI systems, AI policy, responsible AI, AI lifecycle management, AI incident management, AI transparency, AI bias, AI certification readiness, or any topic related to implementing or auditing an AI Management System.",
"category": "Technology Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/iso42001-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "mcp-builder-anthropic",
"source": "./",
"description": "Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).",
"category": "Technology Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/mcp-builder-anthropic"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "nis2-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) compliance advisor for essential and important entities: entity classification, Art. 21 risk management measures, Art. 23 incident reporting timelines (24h/72h/1 month), Art. 20 governance obligations, supply chain security (Art. 21(2)(d); coordinated risk assessments Art. 22), gap assessments, policy drafting, ISO 27001 alignment, and penalty exposure analysis. Also covers Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, the technical/methodological sub-requirements for Art. 21(2) and the significant-incident thresholds binding on DNS/cloud/data-centre/MSP/MSSP/trust-service and other digital entities. Use for NIS2 readiness, transposition questions, ENISA technical implementation guidance, significant-incident thresholds, supervisory differences between essential and important entities, and cross-border coordination.",
"category": "Technology Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/nis2-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "nist-ai-rmf-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor covering all four functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST AI RMF, AI risk management, AI trustworthiness, GOVERN function, MAP function, MEASURE function, MANAGE function, AI RMF Playbook, AI risk profiles, responsible AI, AI bias management, AI transparency, AI explainability, AI reliability, AI safety, NIST AI 100-1, AI risk assessment, AI incident response, or alignment to EU AI Act, ISO 42001, or NIST CSF via AI RMF.",
"category": "Technology Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/nist-ai-rmf-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "nist-csf-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) advisor covering CSF 2.0 and CSF 1.1. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST CSF, cybersecurity risk management, the six CSF functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), CSF profiles, implementation tiers, gap assessments, organizational profiles, community profiles, CSF core subcategories, informative references, or mapping to other frameworks (NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, COBIT).",
"category": "Technology Law",
"skills": [
"./skills/nist-csf-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "tsa-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik",
"source": "./",
"description": "Expert TSA cybersecurity compliance advisor for critical infrastructure owners and operators. Use this skill whenever a user asks about TSA Security Directives for pipelines, freight railroads, passenger rail, public transit, or bus operators; the TSA Cyber Risk Management Program (CRMP); Cybersecurity Implementation Plan (CIP); Cybersecurity Operational Implementation Plan (COIP); Cybersecurity Assessment Plan (CAP); incident reporting to CISA; designation of a Cybersecurity Coordinator; Critical Cyber Systems (CCS); OT/IT network segmentation; the TSA November 2024 NPRM; or any directive in the SD Pipeline-2021 series, SD 1580-21-01 (freight rail), or SD 1582-21-01 (public transit/passenger rail).",
"category": "Transport Maritime",
"skills": [
"./skills/tsa-compliance-tanaji-hemant-naik"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "code-security-review-openai",
"source": "./",
"description": "Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Covers Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Go. Use when the user requests security best practices guidance, a security review or report, or secure-by-default coding help.",
"version": "2026.02.02",
"author": {
"name": "OpenAI"
},
"license": "Apache-2.0",
"category": "Vibe Coding",
"skills": [
"./skills/code-security-review-openai"
],
"strict": false
},
{
"name": "vs-code-extension-antoine-louis",
"source": "./",
"description": "Build VS Code extensions from scratch or convert existing JS/React/Vue apps. Supports commands, webviews (React/Vue), custom editors, tree views, and AI agent integration via file-bridge IPC. Use when user wants to create a VS Code extension, convert a web app to an extension, add webviews or custom UIs to VS Code, implement tree views, build custom file editors, integrate with AI agents, or package/publish extensions (.vsix).",
"version": "2026.02.04",
"author": {
"name": "Antoine Louis (Lawvable)"
},
"license": "AGPL-3.0",
"category": "Vibe Coding",
"skills": [
"./skills/vs-code-extension-antoine-louis"
],
"strict": false
}
]
}Facts
- Kind
- Marketplace
- Repo
- lawvable/awesome-legal-skills
- Group
- Uncategorized
- Marketplace name
- lawve-ai
- Owner
- Lawve AI
- Language
- Python
- Created
- 2025-12-18
- Forks
- 109
- Homepage
- lawve.ai
- Topics
- agent-skills, automation, law, legal-work, workflows
- Plugins
- 42
- 1f/prompts.chatf/prompts.chatf.k.a. Awesome ChatGPT Prompts. Share, discover, and collect prompts from the community. Free and open source — self-host for your organization with complete privacy.
- 2affaan-m/everything-claude-codeaffaan-m/everything-claude-codeThe agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
- 3obra/superpowersobra/superpowersAn agentic skills framework & software development methodology that works.
- 4anthropics/skillsanthropics/skillsPublic repository for Agent Skills
- 5anthropics/claude-codeanthropics/claude-codeClaude Code is an agentic coding tool that lives in your terminal, understands your codebase, and helps you code faster by executing routine tasks, explaining complex code, and handling git workflows - all through natural language commands.
- 6nextlevelbuilder/ui-ux-pro-max-skillnextlevelbuilder/ui-ux-pro-max-skillAn AI skill that provides design intelligence for building professional UI/UX across multiple platforms.
